Algorithms for computational solvent mapping of proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 340-351

  Kortvelyesi, Tamas ^a,b   Dennis, Sheldon ^a   Silberstein, Michael ^c   Brown III, Lawrence ^a,d   Vajda, Sandor ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Fish and Neave   (United States)

Author keywords

Clustering; Docking; Enzyme active site; Ligand binding; Scoring; Solvation

Indexed keywords

LYSOZYME; THERMOLYSIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ELECTRICITY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR PROBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SOLVATION;

2-PROPANOL; ACETONE; ACETONITRILES; ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; BINDING, COMPETITIVE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EGG PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MURAMIDASE; PHENOL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; SOLVENTS; THERMODYNAMICS; THERMOLYSIN;

EID: 0038300317     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10287     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Mattos C, Ringe D. Locating and characterizing binding sites on proteins. Nat Biotech 1996;14:595-599.
2. Allen KN, Bellamacina CR, Ding X, Jeffery CJ, Mattos C, Petsko GA, Ringe D. An experimental approach to mapping the binding surfaces of crystalline proteins. J Phys Chem 1996;100:2605-2611.
3. Mattos C, Ringe D. Protein in organic solvents. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2001;11:761-764.
4. English AC, Done SH, Caves LS, Groom CR, Hubbard RE. Locating interaction sites on proteins: the crystal structure of thermolysin soaked in 2% to 100% isopropanol. Proteins 1999;37: 628-640.
5. English AC, Groom CR, Hubbard RE. Experimental and computational mapping of the binding surface of a crystalline protein. Protein Eng 2001;14:47-59.
6. Liepinsh E, Otting G. Organic solvents identify specific ligand binding sites on protein surfaces. Nat Biotech 1997;15:264-268.
7. Shuker SB, Hajduk PJ, Meadows RP, Fesik SW. Discovering high affinity ligands for proteins: SAR by NMR. Science 1996;274:1531-1534.
8. Goodford PJ. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J Med Chem 1985;28:849-875.
9. Bohm HJ. The computer program LUDI: a new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1992;1:61-78.
10. Lawrence MC, Davis PC. CLIX: a search algorithm for finding novel ligands capable of binding proteins of known three-dimensional structure. Proteins 1992;12:31-41.
11. Verlinde CLMJ, Rudenko G, Hol WGJ. In search of new lead compounds for trypanosomiasis drug design: a protein structure-based linked-fragment approach. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1992;6: 131-147.
12. Rotstein SH, Murcko MA. GroupBuild: a fragment-based method for de novo drug design. J Med Chem 1993;36:1700-1710.
13. King BL, Vajda S, DeLisi C. Empirical free energy as a target function in docking and design: application to HIV-1 protease inhibitors. FEBS Lett 1996;384:87-91.
14. Miranker A, Karplus M. Functionality maps of binding sites: a multiple copy simultaneous search method. Proteins 1991;11:29-34.
15. Caflisch A, Miranker A, Karplus M. Multiple copy simultaneous search and construction of ligands in binding sites: application to inhibitors of HIV-1 aspartic proteinase. J Med Chem 1993;36:2142-2167.
16. Evensen E, Joseph-McCarthy D, Karplus M. MCSS version 2.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University; 1997.
17. Eisen MB, Wiley DC, Karplus M, Hubbard RE. HOOK: a program for finding novel molecular architectures that satisfy the chemical and steric requirements of a macromolecular binding site. Proteins 1994;19:199-221.
18. Dennis S, Kortvelyesi T, Vajda S. Computational mapping identifies the binding sites of organic solvents on proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:4290-4295.
19. Liang J, Edelsbrunner J, Woodward C. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design. Protein Sci 1998;7:1884-1897.
20. Skolnick J, Fetrow JS, Kolinski A. Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis. Nat Biotech 2000;18:283-287.
21. Ondrechen MJ, Clifton JG, Ringe D. THEMATICS: a simple computational predictor of enzyme function from structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:12473-12478.
22. Brady GP Jr, Stouten PFW. Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2000;14:383-401.
23. Ewing TJA, Kuntz ID. Critical evaluation of search algorithms used in automated molecular docking. J Comp Chem 1997;18:1175-1189.
24. Vakser IA, Matar OG, Lam CF. A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein-protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:8477-8482.
25. Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Computer J 1964;7:308-313.
26. Dennis S, Camacho CJ, Vajda S. Exploring potential solvation sites of proteins by multistart local minimization. In: Floudas CA, Pardalos C, editors. Optimization in computational chemistry and molecular biology. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic; 2000. 243 p.
27. Vajda S, Weng Z, Rosenfeld R, DeLisi C. The effect of conformational flexibility and solvation on receptor-ligand binding free energies. Biochemistry 1994;33:13977-13987.
28. Weng Z, Vajda S, DeLisi C. The prediction of protein complexes using empirical free energy functions. Protein Sci 1996;5:614-626.
29. Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem. J Mol Biol 1995;250:258-275.
30. Krystek S, Stouch T, Novotny J. Affinity and specificity of serine endopeptidase-protein inhibitor interactions. J Mol Biol 1993;234: 661-679.
31. Gilson MK, Honig B. Calculation of the total electrostatic energy of a macromolecular system: solvation energies, binding energies, and conformational analysis. Proteins 1988;4:7-18.
32. Honig B, Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science 1995;268:1144-1149.
33. Bruccoleri RE. Grid positioning independence and the reduction of self-energy in the solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. J Comp Chem 1993;14:1417-1422.
34. QUANTA/CHARMM Program, Molecular Simulations Inc., Waltham, MA, USA; 1994.
35. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette JL, DeLisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 1996;267:707-726.
36. Miyazava S, Jernigan R. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
37. Schaefer M, Karplus M. A comprehensive analytical treatment of continuum electrostatics. J Phys Chem 1996;100:1578-1599.
38. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson B, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comp Chem 1983;4: 197-214.
39. Laskowski RA, Luscombe NM, Swindells MH, Thornton JM. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Protein Sci 1996;5:2438-2452.
40. Weiner SJ, Kollman PA, Case DA, Singh UC, Ghio C, Alagona P, Profeta S Jr, Weiner P. A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acids and proteins. J Am Chem Soc 1984;106: 765-784.
41. DOCK 5.0.0. San Francisco, CA: University of California; 2002.
42. Qiu D, Shenkin PS, Hollinger FP, Still WC. The GB/SA continuum model for solvation. A fast analytical method for the calculation of approximate Born radii. J Phys Chem A 1997;101:3005-3014.