Zipper-Featured δ-Peptide Foldamers Driven by Donor-Acceptor Interaction. Design, Synthesis, and Characterization

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 270-279

  Zhao, Xin ^a   Jia, Mu Xin ^b   Jiang, Xi Kui ^a   Wu, Li Zhu ^c   Li, Zhan Ting ^a   Chen, Guang Ju ^b  

^a SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY   (China)

^b BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c TECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMATIONS; DNA; NAPHTHALENE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; QUENCHING;

CIRCULAR DICHROISM INVESTIGATIONS (CD);

PROTEINS;

PEPTIDE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZIPPER FEATURED DELTA PEPTIDE FOLDAMER;

ARTICLE; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SPECTROFLUOROMETRY;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION;

EID: 0347763387     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo035149i     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. For review articles, see: (a) Bassani, D. M.; Lehn, J.-M.; Baum, G.; Fenske, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1845.
2. (b) Seebach, D.; Matthews, J. L. Chem. Commun. 1997, 2015.
3. (c) Gellman, S. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 173.
4. (d) Nowick, J. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 287.
5. (e) Katz, T. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1921.
6. (f) Cubberley, M. S.; Iverson, B. L. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 650.
7. (g) Hill, D. J.; Mio, M. J.; Prince, R. B.; Hughes, T. S.; Moore, J. S. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3893.
8. (h) Seebach, D.; Beck, A. K.; Brenner, M.; Gaul, C.; Heckel, A. Chimia 2001, 55, 831.
9. (i) Gong, B. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 4336.
10. (j) Zhao, D.; Moore, J. S. Chem. Commun. 2003, 807.
11. For recent examples, see: (a) Berl, V.; Huc, I.; Khoury, R. G.; Krische, M. J.; Lehn, J.-M. Nature 2000, 407, 720.
12. (b) Barboiu, M.; Lehn, J.-M. PNAS 2002, 99, 5201.
13. (c) Petitjean, A.; Cuccia, L. A.; Lehn, J.-M.; Nierengarten, H.; Schmutz, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1195.
14. For recent examples, see: (a) Prince, R. B.; Moore, J. S.; Brunsveld, L. ; Meijer, E. W. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 4150.
15. (b) Oh, K.; Jeong, K.-S.; Moore, J. S. Nature 2001, 414, 889.
16. (c) Zhao, D.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9996.
17. (d) Hill, D. J.; Moore, J. S. PNAS 2002, 99, 5053.
18. (e) Tanatani, A.; Hughes, T. S.; Moore, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 325.
19. (f) Matsuda, K.; Stone, M. T.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11836.
20. (g) Wang, W.; Li, L.-S.; Helms, G.; Zhou, H.-H.; Li, A. D. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1120.
21. For recent examples, see: (a) Fisk, J. D.; Powell, D. R.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5443.
22. (b) Seebach, D.; Schreiber, J. V.; Abele, S.; Daura, X.; van Gunsteren, W. F. Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 34.
23. (c) Langenhan, J. M.; Fisk, J. D.; Gellman, S. H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2559.
24. (d) Arvidsson, P. I.; Rueping, M.; Seebach, D. Chem. Commun. 2001, 649.
25. (e) Porter, E. A.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7324.
26. (a) Hanessian, S.; Luo, X.; Schaum, R.; Michnick, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8569.
27. (b) Woll, M. G.; Lai, J. R.; Guzei, I. A.; Taylor, S. J. C.; Smith, M. E. B.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11077.
28. (c) Seebach, D.; Brenner, M.; Rueping, M.; Jaun, B. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 573.
29. (a) Kirshenbaum, K.; Barron, A. E.; Goldsmith, R. A.; Armand, P.; Bradley, E. K.; Truong, K. T.; Dill, K. A.; Cohen, F. E.; Zuckermann, R. N. PNAS 1998, 95, 4303.
30. (b) Armand, P.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Goldsmith, R. A.; Farr-Jones, S.; Barron, A. E.; Truong, K. T.; Dill, K. A.; Mierke, D. F.; Cohen, F. E.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Bradley, E. K. PNAS 1998, 95, 4309.
31. (c) Jiang, H.; Léger, J.-M.; Huc, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3448.
32. Corbin, P. S.; Zimmerman, S. C.; Thiessen, P. A.; Hawryluk, N. A.; Murray, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10475.
33. Several rigid glyco- or alkene-based δ-peptide analogues with ordered conformations in solution have been reported, see: (a) Machetti, F.; Ferrali, A.; Menchi, G.; Occhiato, E. G.; Guarna, A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3987.
34. (b) Gardner, R. R.; Liang, G.-B.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1806.
35. (c) Wipf, P.; Henninger, T. C.; Geib, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6088.
36. (d) von Rödern, E. G.; Lohof, E.; Hessler, G.; Hoffmann, M.; Kessler, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10156.
37. (e) Jiang, H.; Léger, J.-M.; Huc, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3448. Nowick has recently used ornithine as a scaffold to build hydrogen bond-mediated folding systems, see: Nowick, J. S.; Brower, J. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 876.
38. (e) Jiang, H.; Léger, J.-M.; Huc, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3448. Nowick has recently used ornithine as a scaffold to build hydrogen bond-mediated folding systems, see: Nowick, J. S.; Brower, J. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 876.
39. (a) Amabilino D. B.; Stoddart, J. F. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2725.
40. (b) Philp, D.; Stoddart, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1154.
41. (c) Fyfe, M. C. T.; Stoddart, J. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 393.
42. (d) Raymo, F. M.; Stoddart, J. F. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 1643.
43. (a) Lokey, R. S.; Iverson, B. L. Nature 1995, 375, 303.
44. (b) Nguyen, J. Q.; Iverson, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2639.
45. (c) Zych, A. J.; Iverson, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8898.
46. (d) Cubberley, M. S.; Iverson, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7560.
47. (a) Hamilton, D. G.; Feeder, N.; Prodi, L.; Teat, S. J.; Clegg, W.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1096.
48. (b) Hamilton, D. G.; Davies, J. E.; Prodi, L.; Sanders, J. K. M. Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 608.
49. (c) Zhang, Q.; Hamilton, D. G.; Feeder, N.; Teat, S. J.; Goodman, J. M.; Sanders, J. K. M. New J. Chem. 1999, 23, 897.
50. (d) Hansen, J. G.; Feeder, N.; Hamilton, D. G.; Gunter, M. J.; Becher, J.; Sanders, J. K. M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 449.
51. (a) Gunter, M. J.; Bampos, N.; Johnstone, K. D.; Sanders, J. K. M. New J. Chem. 2001, 25, 166.
52. (b) Wang, X.-Z.; Li, X.-Q.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Shao, X.-B.; Zhao, X.; Deng, P. ; Jiang, X.-K.; Li, Z.-T. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 2904.
53. (c) Shao, X.-B.; Jiang, X.-K.; Wang, X.-Z.; Li, Z.-T.; Zhu, S.-Z. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 4881.
54. (a) Gabriel, G. J.; Iverson, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15174.
55. (b) Zhou, Q.-Z.; Jiang, X.-K.; Shao, X.-B.; Chen, G.-J.; Jia, M.-X.; Li, Z.-T. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1955.
56. (a) Oklobdzija, M.; Comisso, G.; Decorte, E.; Fajdiga, T.; Gratton, G.; Moimas, F.; Toso, R.; Sunjic, V. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1983, 20, 1329.
57. (b) Patterson, K. H.; Depree, G. J.; Zender, J. A.; Morris, Pe. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 281.
58. 1H NMR spectra of folding systems. For examples, see ref 10a and also: Nelson, J. C.; Saven, J. G.; Moore, J. S.; Wolynes, P. G. Science 1997, 277, 1793.
59. These results reasonably reflect that the donor-acceptor interactions in the shorter δ-peptides are not strong enough to lead to observable NOEs between the DAN and PDI protons, but should not be used to negate the folded conformations of the peptides.
60. Cantor, C. R.; Schimmel, P. R. Biophysical Chemistry; Freeman: New York, 1980.
61. It was found that the solubility of the long δ-peptides could be improved substantially in chloroform in the presence of even 0.5% of trifluoroacetic acid.
62. The UV-vis spectra of 1b, 1c, 1e, and if are substantially different in shape due to their varying ratios of DAN and PDI units. However, important hypochromic effects were also exhibited for these δ-peptides.
63. 0 is the combined absorbance of the mixture solution of 5a and 10a at the assigned wavelength.
64. 2O systems with higher water content.
65. Irreversible unfolding or denaturation of ionic peptide aedamers has been reported, see ref 10b.
66. -5 M) in chloroform containing 0.5% of CF3COOH is ca. 92% of that of a chloroform solution of 4 at the same concentration. Therefore, the fluorescent quenching observed for the peptides is obviously mainly due to intramolecular interactions between DAN and PDI units.
67. Weiner, S. J.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A.; Singh, U. C.; Ghio, C.; Alagona, G.; Profeta, J. S.; Weiner, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 765-784.
68. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
69. (a) Ditchfield, R.; Hehre, W. J.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 724.
70. (b) Hehre, W. J.; Ditchfield, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 2257.
71. (c) Hariharan, P. C.; Pople, J. A. Mol. Phys. 1974, 27, 209.
72. (d) Wong, M. W.; Wiberg, K. B.; Frisch, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1645.
73. Anelli, P. L.; Ashton, P. R.; Ballardini, R.; Balzani, V.; Delgado, M.; Gandolfi, M. T.; Goodnow, T. T.; Kaifer, A. E.; Philp, D.; Pietraszkiewicz, M.; Prodi, L.; Reddington, M. V.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Spencer, N.; Stoddart, J. F.; Vicent, C.; Williams, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 193.
74. Rosowsky, A.; Forsch, R. A.; Bader, H.; Freisheim, J. H. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 1447.
75. Kempton, R. J.; Black, A. M.; Anstead, G. M.; Kumar, A. A.; Blankënship, D. T.; Freisheim, J. H. J. Med. Chem. 1982, 25, 475.
76. Hyperchem 5.1 for windows; Hypercube Inc.: 1115 NW 4th Street, Gainesville, FL 32601-4256.
77. (a) Chen, G.; Cruz, R.; Martinze, M.; Lara-Ochoa, F. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2000, 496, 73.
78. (b) Cheng, Y.; Yang, Z.; Tan, H.; Liu, R.; Chen, G.; Jia, Z. Biophys. J. 2002, 83, 2202.
79. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
80. Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200.
81. (a) Chen, G.; Liu, R.; Silaghi-Dumitrescu, I.; Espinoza-Perez, G.; Zentella-Dehesa, A.; Lara-Ochoa, F. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2001, 83, 60.
82. (b) Chen, G.; Su, S.; Liu, R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 1570.
83. (c) Tan, H.; Qu, W.; Chen, G.; Liu, R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 369, 556.