ProVal: A Protein-Scoring Function for the Selection of Native and Near-Native Folds

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 289-302

  Berglund, Anders ^a,c   Head, Richard D ^a,b   Welsh, Eric A ^a   Marshall, Garland R ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b PFIZER INC   (United States)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Empirical scoring function; Partial least squares; PLS; Protein folding; Structure prediction

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN VALIDATE; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS; SCORING SYSTEM; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DISULFIDES; ELECTROSTATICS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0345827706     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10523     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Tobi D, Shafran G, Linial N, Elber R. On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials. Proteins 2000;40:71-85.
2. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000;10:139-145.
3. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-846.
4. Eyrich VA, Standley DM, Friesner RA. Prediction of protein tertiary structure to low resolution: performance for a large and structurally diverse test set. J Mol Biol 1999;288:725-742.
5. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999;34:82-95.
6. Moult J. Comparison of database potentials and molecular mechanics force fields. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:194-199.
7. Vajda S, Sippl M, Novotny J. Empirical potentials and functions for protein folding and binding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997;7:222-228.
8. Sippl MJ. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:229-235.
9. Jones DT, Thornton JM. Potential energy functions for threading. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:210-216.
10. Jernigan RL, Bahar I. Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:195-209.
11. Hao MH, Scheraga HA. Designing potential energy functions for protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1999;9:184-188.
12. Roux B, Simonson T. Implicit solvent models. Biophys Chem 1999;78:1-20.
13. Bahar I, Kaplan M, Jernigan RL. Short-range conformational energies, secondary structure propensities, and recognition of correct sequence-structure matches. Proteins 1997;29:292-308.
14. Eyrich VA, Standley DM, Felts AK, Friesner RA. Protein tertiary structure prediction using a branch and bound algorithm. Proteins 1999;35:41-57.
15. Huang ES, Subbiah S, Levitt M. Recognizing native folds by the arrangement of hydrophobic and polar residues. J Mol Biol 1995;252:709-720.
16. Huang ES, Subbiah S, Tsai J, Levitt M. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 1996;257:716-725.
17. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate x-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996;258: 367-392.
18. Head RD, Smythe ML, Oprea TI, Waller CL, Green SM, Marshall GR. VALIDATE: a new method for the receptor-based prediction of binding affinities of novel ligands. J Am Chem Soc 1996;118: 3959-3969.
19. Wold S, Ruhe A, Wold H, Dunn WJ III. The collinearity problem in linear regression. The partial least squares approach to generalized inverses. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 1984;5:735-743.
20. Hobohm U, Sander C. Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Protein Sci 1994;3:522-524.
21. Abola EE, Sussman JL, Prilusky J, Manning NO. Protein data bank archives of three-dimensional macromolecular structures. Macromolecular crystallography, part B. Methods Enzymol 1997; 277:556-571.
22. Sussman JL, Lin DW, Jiang JS, Manning NO, Prilusky J, Ritter O, Abola EE. Protein Data Bank (PDB): database of three-dimensional structural information of biological macromolecules. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1998;54:1078-1084.
23. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. Scop-a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
24. de Araujo AFP. Folding protein models with a simple hydrophobic energy function: The fundamental importance of monomer inside/outside segregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:12482-12487.
25. Wireko FC, Kellogg GE, Abraham DJ. Allosteric modifiers of hemoglobin. 2. Crystallographically determined binding sites and hydrophobic binding/interaction analysis of novel hemoglobin oxygen effects. J Med Chem 1991;34:758-767.
26. Kellog GE, Semus SF, Abraham DJ. HINT: a new method of empirical hydrophobic field calculation for CoMFA. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1991;5:545-552.
27. Breuer M. ESTAR: electrostatic properties research package. W-8033 Martinsried, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry.
28. Dudek MJ, Ramnarayan K, Ponder JW. Protein structure prediction using a combination of sequence homology and global energy minimization. II. Energy functions. J Comput Chem 1998;19:548-573.
29. Kurochkina N, Lee B. Hydrophobic potential by pairwise surface-area sum. Protein Eng 1995;8:437-442.
30. Vonfreyberg B, Braun W. Minimization of empirical energy functions in proteins including hydrophobic surface-area effects. J Comput Chem 1993;14:510-521.
31. Le Grand SM, Merz KM Jr. Rapid approximation to molecular surface area via the use of boolean logic and look-up tables. J Comput Chem 1993;14:349-352.
32. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol 1998;277:985-994.
33. Wold S. Exponentially weighted moving principal components-analysis and projections to latent structures. Chemometrics Intelligent Lab Systems 1994;23:149-161.
34. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
35. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234:779-815.
36. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
37. Galaktionov S, Nikiforovich GV, Marshall GR. Ab initio modeling of small, medium, and large loops in proteins. Biopolymers 2001;60:153-168.
38. Galaktionov SG, Marshall GR. Properties of intraglobular contacts in proteins: an approach to prediction of tertiary structure. Proc 27th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Vol. 5: Biotechnology Computing. Wailea, HW, USA, January 1994. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994.
39. Pappu RV, Marshall GR, Ponder JW. A potential smoothing algorithm accurately predicts transmembrane helix packing. Nat Struct Biol 1999;6:50-55.