A clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays bonded with different luting agents

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 273-283

  Gemalmaz, Deniz ^a,b   Ozcan, Mutlu ^a   Alkumru, Hasan Necdet ^a  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b I U Dis Hekimligi Fakultesi   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DUCERAM; ENFORCE SURE CURE; ENFORCE-SURE CURE; GERISTORE; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; VARIOLINK;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SURVIVAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; CEMENTATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035468419     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Alkumru HN, Ozean M, Nergiz I, Gemalmaz D, Akkaya A. Effect of surface treatment on the bond strength of luting cement to In-Ceram [abstract 2238]. J Dent Res 1998;77:911.
2. Burgess J, Norling B, Summitt J. Resin ionomer restorative materials:the new generation. J Esth Dent 1994;6:207-215.
3. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966:16:297-305.
4. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KLV. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 1998:26:311-317.
5. Davis EL, Joynt RB, Wieczkowski G, Giordano L. Shear strength and microleakage of light-cured glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1993:6:127-129.
6. EI-Mowafy OM, Lewis DW, Benmergui C, Levinton C. Metaanalysis on long term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. J Dent 1994:22:33-43.
7. Friedl KH, Miller KA, Schmalz G, Bey B. Clinical and quantitative marginal analysis of feldspathic ceramic inlays at 4 years. Clin Oral Invest 1997;1:163-168.
8. Galan D. Clinical application of Geristore glass-ionomer restorative in older dentitions. J Esthet Dent 1991;6:221-226.
9. Gemalmaz D, Ozean M, Yoruç AB, Alkumru HN. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:646-651.
10. Haas M, Arnetzl G, Wegscheider WA, König K, Bratschko R. Clinical results and material behavior of composite, ceramic and gold inlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992;47:18-22.
11. Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Der Einfluss der Kavitätenpreparation auf die Randspaltbreite bei Cerec Inlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990;45:675- 677.
12. Höglund Aberg C, van Dijken JWV, Oloffson AL Three year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52:140-149.
13. Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Herle G. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 1992:20:171-177.
14. Isenberg BG, Essig ME, Mueninghoff LM, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of CEREC CAD/CAM restorations [abstract 1597]. J Dent Res 1990;69:308.
15. Isidor F, Brondum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:140-144.
16. Jensen ME. A two year clinical study of posterior etchedporcelain resin bonded restorations. Am J Dent 1988;1:2733.
17. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Statist Assoc 1958;53:457-465.
18. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of allceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999:81:652-661.
19. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992:23:181-186.
20. Lambrechts P, Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Braem M, Vannerie G. Classification and potential of composite luting materials. In: Mörmann WH (ed). International Symposium on Computer Restorations. The state of the art of the Cerec method. Proceedings. Berlin: Quintessenz, 1991:61.
21. Lehner C, Studer S, Brodbeck U, Schärer P. Six-year clinical results of leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays. Acta Med Dent Helv 1998:3:137-146.
22. Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease and pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963:21:533-551.
23. Me Lean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994;25:587-589.
24. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993:51:201-206.
25. Molin M, Karlsson S. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of a ceramic (Optec) inlay system. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54:145-149.
26. Mörmann W, Krejci I. Clinical and SEM evaluation of Cerec inlays after 5 years in situ. In: Mörmann WH (ed). State of the Art of the Cerec-Method. International Symposium on Computer Restorations. Proceedings. Berlin: Quintessenz, 1991:25-32.
27. Nathanson D. Factors in optimizing the strength of bonded ceramic restorations. In: Mörmann WH (ed). State of the Art of the Cerec-Method. International Symposium on Computer Restorations. Proceedings. Berlin: Quintessenz, 1991:51.
28. Newburg R, Pameijer CH. Composite resins bonded to porcelain with silane solution. JADA 1978:96:288-291.
29. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Clinical evaluation of resin fillings and inlays:8-year report [abstract 2257]. J Dent Res 1998:71:914.
30. Qualtrough AJE, Wilson NHF. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. J Dent 1996:24:317-323.
31. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10 year report. J Dent 1999:27:13-19.
32. Reiss B, Walther W. Survival rate analysis and clinical followup of tooth-colored restorations of CEREC. ZWR 1991;100: 329-332.
33. Rose D, Platzer U, Roth KKF. Untersuchungen zur Kompositfuge bei computererstellten Keramikinlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990:45:677-679.
34. Roulet JF. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam-results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest 1997;l:40-46.
35. Roulet JF, Bartsch T, Hickel R, Kunzelmann K, Mehl A. Luting composite wear of glass ceramic inlays after 9 years [abstract 1197]. J Dent Res 1997;76:163.
36. Roulet JF, Herder S. Bonded ceramic inlays. Chicago: Quintessence,1990.
37. Roulet JF, Söderholm KJM, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995:74:381-387.
38. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Oneyear clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1998:80:410416.
39. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1995:73:392-399.
40. Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964:2:121-135.
41. Sjôgren G, Bergman M, Molin M, Bessing C. A clinical examination of ceramic (Cerec) inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1992; 50:171-178.
42. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken J, Bergmann M. Ceramic inlays cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995:53:325-330.
43. Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avéra SP. Porcelain-composite interface microleakage with various porcelain surface treatments. Dent Mater 1991;7:118-123.
44. Stenberg R, Matsson L. Clinical evaluation of glass ceramic inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1993:51:91-97.
45. Sturdevant JR, Heymann HO, Wilder AD, Roberson TM, Bayne SC. Composite cement thickness of CEREC CAD/CAM ceramic inlays [abstract 245]. J Dent Res 1991;70:296.
46. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhesive Dent 1999;l:57-67.
47. Taleghani M, Leinfelder KF. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct porcelain bonded onlays [abstract 546]. J Dent Res 1989;68:249.
48. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Schams A. Clinical evaluation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic inlays in vivo: 2year results. Clin Oral Invest 1997;l:27-34.
49. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hôrsted-Binslev P. Marginal fit of toothcolored inlays [abstract 1145]. J Dent Res 1992;71:658.
50. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hôrsted-Binslev P. A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:186-192.
51. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hôrsted-Binslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: An in vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:147-153.
52. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A five year clinical study of toothcolored inlays [abstract 2255]. J Dent Res 1998;77:913.
53. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems:Threeyear results. Int Dent J 1996;46:10-14.
54. Vaiittu PK, Forss H. A study of bonding glass polyalkeonate cement to the surface of dental ceramic material. Int Dent J 1997:47:53-58.
55. van Dijken JWV, Hôrsted-Binslev P. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkeonate cement or resin composite. J Dent 1994:22:265-272.
56. van Dijken JWV, Höglund-Aberg C, Olofsson AL Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up. J Dent 1998;26:219-225.
57. Wilder AD, BayneSC, Heymann HO. Long term clinical performance of direct posterior composites. Transac Acad Dent Mater 1996:9:151-169.
58. Wolf DM, Powers JM, O'Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater 1992:8:158-161.
59. Zuellig-Singer R, Bryant RW. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays:lnfluence of luting agent. Quintessence Int 1998;29:573-582.