Issues in measuring reliability correlation versus percentage of agreement

Written Communication

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 354-367

  Hayes, John R ^a   Hatch, Jill A ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039908400     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088399016003004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allen, M. S. (1995). Valuing differences: Portnet's first year. Assessing Writing, 2, 67-89.
2. Almasi, J. F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314-351.
3. Boice, B. (1997). Which is more productive, writing in binge patterns of creative illness or in moderation? Written Communication, 14, 435-459.
4. Chambliss, M. J. (1995). Text cues and strategies successful readers use to construct the gist of lengthy written arguments. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 778-807.
5. Chapman, M. L. (1994). The emergence of genres: Some findings from an examination of first-grade writing. Written Communication, 23, 348-380.
6. Crammond, J. G. (1998). The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. Written Communication, 14, 230-268.
7. Deegan, D. (1995). Exploring individual differences among novices reading in a specific domain: The case of law. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 154-170.
8. Dole, J. A., Brown, K. J., & Trathen, W. (1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 62-88.
9. Faber, B. (1996). Rhetoric in competition. Written Communication, 13, 355-384.
10. Gearhart, Mv Herman, J. L, Novak, J. R., & Wolf, S. A. (1995). Toward the instructional utility of large-scale assessment: Validation of a new narrative rubric. Assessing Writing, 2, 207-242.
11. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A. D., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Poundstone, C C, Rice, M. E., Faibisch, F. M., Hunt, B., & Mitchell, A. M. (1996). Growth in literacy engagement: Change in motivation and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 306-332.
13. Hartman, D. (1995). Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 520-561.
14. Haswell, R. H., & Haswell, J. T. (1996). Gender bias and critique of student writing. Assessing Writing, 3, 31-83.
15. Johnson, T. M., Jones, G. A-, Thomton, C. A., Langrall, C. W., & Rous, A. (1998). Students' thinking and writing in the context of probability. Written Communication, 15, 203-229.
16. Mathison, M. A. (1996). Writing the critique, a text about a text. Written Communication, 13, 314-354.
17. Newell, G. E. (1994). The effects of written between-draft responses on students' writing and reasoning about literature. Written Communication, 11, 311-347.
18. Nystrand, M., Cohen, A. S., & Dowling, N. (1993). Addressing reliability problems in the portfolio assessment of college writing. Educational Assessment, 1, 53-70.
19. Purnell-Gates, V. (19%). Stories, coupons, and the TV Guide: Relationships between home literacy experiences and emergent literacy knowledge. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 406-428.
20. Schraw, G., & Bruning, R. (1996). Readers' implicit models of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 290-305.
21. Smolkin, L. B. (1997). Dealing with dialogue: Fifth graders' responses to reading a play. Researdi in the Teaching of English, 31, 240-266.
22. Soliday, M., & Gleason, B. (1997). From remediation to enrichment: Evaluating a mainstreaming project. Journal of Basic Writing, 16(1), 64-78.
23. Sperling, M. (1994). Constructing the perspective of teacher-as-reader: A framework for studying response to student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 175-207.
24. Sperling, M., & Woodlief, L. (1997). Two classrooms, two writing communities: Urban and suburban tenth-graders learning to write. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 205-239.
25. Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Basquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430-456.
26. Stolarek, E. A. (1994). Prose modeling and metacognition: The effect of modeling on developing a metacognitive stance toward writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 154-174.
27. Taylor, C. S. (1997). Using portfolios to teach teachers about assessment: How to survive. Educational Assessment, 4, 123-147.
28. Turner, J. C. (1995). The influence of classroom contexts on young children's motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 410-441.
29. van Gelderen, A. (1997). Elementary students' skills in revising. Written Communication, 14, 360-397.
30. Venezky, R. L., Bristow, F. S., & Sabatini, J. P. (1994). Meaning change in adult literacy programs: Enduring issues and a few answers. Educational Assessment, 2, 101-131.
31. Wollman-Bonilla, J. E. (1994). Why don't they "just speak?" Attempting literature discussion with more and less able readers. Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 231-258.
32. Yageliski, R. P. (1995). The role of classroom context in the revision strategies of student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 216-238.
33. Zhu, W. (1995). Effects of training for peer response on students' comments and interaction. Written Communication, 12, 492-528.