Rhetoric in competition the formation of organizational discourse in conference on college composition and communication abstracts

Written Communication

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 355-384

  Faber, Brenton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144440791     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088396013003003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. AUhusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (B. Brewster, Trans.)- In L. Althusser (Ed.), Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 127-186). New York: Monthly Review Press.
2. Barton, E. (1993). Evidentials, argumentation, epistemological stance. College English, 55,745-769.
3. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition /culture /power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Berlin, J. (1993). Composition studies and cultural studies: Collapsing boundaries. In A. Gère (Ed.), Into the field: Sites of composition studies (pp. 99-116). New York: MLA.
6. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
7. Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic pouter (J- Thompson, Ed., G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Polity.
9. Bruffee, K. A. (1986) Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographical essay. College English, 48,773-790.
10. Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9,221-235.
11. Connor, U., & Kaplan, R. B. (Eds.). (1987). Writing across languages: Analysis ojU. text. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
12. Cooper, R. (1989) Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 3: The contribution of Jacques Derrida. Organization Studies, 10,479-502.
13. Crowley, T. (1989). The politics of discourse. London: MacMillan.
14. Faigley, L. (1992). Fragmmts of rationality: Postmodemity and the subject of composition. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
15. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
16. Flower, L., & Ackerman J. (1994). Writers at work Strategies for communicating in business and professional settings. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
17. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
18. Gilbert, G. N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7,113-122.
19. Haas, C. (1994). Learning to read biology: One student's rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11,43-84.
20. Herrington, A., & Moran, C. (Eds.). (1992). Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines. New York: Modern Language Association.
21. Kaplan, R. B., Cantor, S., Hagstrom, C., Kamhi-Stein, L. D., Shiotani, Y., & Boyd Zimmerman, C. (1994). On abstract writing. Text, 14,401-426.
22. Knight, L. W. (1988). Seeking federal funding for research. In L. Deneef, C. Goodwin, & E. McCrate (Eds.), The academic's handbook. Durham: Duke University Press.
23. Kogen, M. (Ed.). (1989). Writing in the business professions. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
24. Kress, G., & Hodge, B. (1979). Language and ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
25. Kritzman, L. (Ed.). (1988). Michel Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture. Interviews and other writings 1977-1984. (A. Sheridan et al., Trans). New York: Routledge.
26. McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
27. Melander, B., Swales, J. M., & Fredrickson, K. M. (1994). Journal abstracts from three academic fields in the United States and Sweden: National or disciplinary proclivities? Unpublished manuscript.
28. Mouffe, C. (1988). Hegemony and new political subjects: Toward a new concept of democracy. In N. Carry & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 89-104). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
29. Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
30. Nelson, J. S., Megill, A., & McCloskey D. N. (1987). Rhetoric of inquiry. In J. S. Nelson, A. Megill, & D. N. McCloskey (Eds.), Tlie rhetoric of the human sciences (pp. 1-18). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
31. Odell, L., & Goswami, D. (Eds.). (1985). Writing in non-academic settings. New York: Guilford.
32. Owens, D. (1993). Composition as the voicing of multiple fictions. In A. Gère (Ed.), Into the field: Sites of composition studies (pp. 159-175). New York: MLA.
33. Spellmeyer, K. (1993). Common ground: Dialogue, understanding and tlie teaching of compo-sition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Spilka, R. (Ed.). (1993). Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
35. Steiner, E. (1985). The concept of context and the theory of action. In P. Chilton (Ed.), Language and the nuclear arms debate (pp. 215-233). London: Pinter.
36. Swales, J. M. (1984). Research into the structure of introductions to journal articles and its application to the teaching of academic writing. In R. Williams, J. M. Swales, & J. Kirkman (Eds.), Common ground. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Swales, J. M. (1993). Citation, research space and program space: The case of ISA abstracts. Unpublished manuscript.
39. Tiemey, R. J. (1994). Research in a state of change: Some shis in literacy research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association, Toronto.
40. Trimbur, J. (1993). Composition studies: Postmodern or popular. In A. Gère (Ed.), Into the field: Sites of composition studies (pp. 117-132). New York: MLA.
41. van Dijk, T. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse £f Society, 4, 249-283.