Programing by demonstration: Coping with suboptimal teaching actions

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 299-319

  Chen, Jason ^a   Zelinsky, Alex ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Configuration space; Hybrid dynamic systems; Programing by Demonstration; Teaching by showing

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL SYSTEMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TEACHING;

TEACHING ACTIONS;

ROBOT APPLICATIONS;

EID: 0037711207     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0278364903022005002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Asada, H. May 1990. Teaching and learning of compliance using neural nets: Representation and generalization to non-linear compliance. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1237-1244.
2. Asada, H., and Izumi, H. 1989. Automatic program generation from teaching data for the hybrid control of robots. In IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 5:163-173.
3. Atkeson, C. G., and Schaal, S. May 1997. Learning tasks from a single demonstration. In Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1706-1712.
4. Brockett, R. W. 1993. Hybrid models for motion control systems. In H. L. Trentelman and J. C. Willems, eds, Essays on Control: Perspectives in the Theory and Its Applications, Birkhauser, Boston, MA, chapter 2, pp. 29-5.
5. Chen, J. 2001. Coping with demonstration suboptimality in robot programming by demonstration. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering, FEIT, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
6. Chen, J. R., and McCarragher, B. J. April 2000. Programming by demonstration: constructing task level plans in a hybrid dynamic framework. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 1402-1407.
7. Chen, J. R., and Zelinsky, A. May 2001. Generating a configuration space representation for assembly tasks from demonstration. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Seoul, Korea.
8. Delson, N., and West, H. 1996. Robot programming by human demonstration: Adaptation and inconsistency in constrained motion. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
9. Friedrich, H., Kaiser, M., and Dillmann, R. July 1995. Obtaining good performance from a bad teacher. In Workshop: Programming by Demonstration vs. Learning from Examples; International Conference on Machine Learning, CA.
10. Hannaford, B., and Lee, P. 1991. Hidden Markov model analysis of force/torque information in telemanipulation. International Journal of Robotics Research 10(5):528-539.
11. Hovland, G. E., and McCarragher, B. J. September 1997. Combining force and position measurements for the modeling of robotic assembly. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'97), Grenoble, France, pp. 655-660.
12. Ikeuchi, K., Kawade, M., and Suehiro, T. 1993. Toward assembly plan from observation, task recognition with planar, curved and mechanical contacts. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2294-2301.
13. Kaiser, M., and Dillman, R. April 1996. Building elementary skills from human demonstration. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2700-2705.
14. Koeppe, R., and Hirzinger, G. 2000. A signal-based approach to localization and navigation of autonomous compliant motion. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
15. Latombe, J.-C. 1991. Robot Motion Planning, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
16. Latombe, J., Kavraki, L. E., Svestka, P., and Overmars, M. H. 1996. Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 12(4):566-580.
17. Lozano-Perez, T. 1983. Spatial planning: A configuration space approach. IEEE Transactions on Computing C32:108-120.
18. McCarragher, B. J. May 1994. Force sensing from human demonstration using a hybrid dynamical model and qualitative reasoning. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, Vol. 1, pp. 557-563.
19. McCarragher, B. J. 1996. Task primitives for the discrete event modeling and control of 6-DOF assembly tasks. In IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 12(2):280-289.
20. McCarragher, B. J., and Asada, H. 1995. The discrete event modeling and trajectory planning of robotic assembly tasks. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurements and Control 117(3):394-400.
21. Nechyba, M. C., and Xu, Y. April 1996. On the fidelity of skill models. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN.
22. Pomerleau, D. A. 1991. Efficient training of artificial neural networks for autonomous navigation. Neural Computation 3(1):88-97.
23. Raibert, M. H., and Craig, J. J. 1981. Hybrid position/force control of manipulators. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 102/127:126-133.
24. Skubic, M., and Volz, R. A. 1996. Identifying contact formations from sensory patterns and its applicability to robot programming by demonstration. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 458-464.
25. Tso, S. K., and Liu, K. P. April 1997. Demonstrated trajectory selection by hidden Markov model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2713-2718, Albuquerque, NM.
26. Witvrouw, W., Wang, Q., De Schutter, J., and Graves, S. April 1996. Derivation of compliant motion programs based on human demonstration. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2616-2621.