On the conformation of the COOH-terminal domain of the large mechanosensitive channel MscL

Journal of General Physiology

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 227-244

  Anishkin, Andriy ^a   Gendel, Vyacheslav ^a   Sharifi, Neda A ^a   Chiang, Chien Sung ^a   Shirinian, Lena ^a   Guy, H Robert ^b   Sukharev, Sergei ^a  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphipathic helix; Channel gating; Coiled coil; Disulfide trapping; MD simulation

Indexed keywords

ACIDIFICATION; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE; CHANNEL GATING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ENERGY; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYPERPOLARIZATION; INHIBITION KINETICS; PH; POTASSIUM CURRENT;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CELL LINE; CELL SURVIVAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYSTEINE; CYTOPLASM; DITHIOTHREITOL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; ION CHANNEL GATING; ION CHANNELS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MUTATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; OXIDANTS; OXYGEN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; REDUCING AGENTS;

EID: 0037334905     PISSN: 00221295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.20028768     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ajouz, B., C. Berrier, A. Garrigues, M. Besnard, and A. Ghazi. 1998. Release of thioredoxin via the mechanosensitive channel MscL during osmotic downshock of Escherichia coli cells. J. Biol. Chem. 273:26670-26674.
2. Arkin, I.T., S.I. Sukharev, P. Blount, C. Kung, and A.T. Brunger. 1998. Helicity, membrane incorporation, orientation and thermal stability of the large conductance mechanosensitive ion channel from E. coli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1369:131-140.
3. Betanzos, M., C.-S. Chiang, H.R. Guy, and S. Sukharev. 2002. A large iris-like expansion of a mechanosensitive channel protein induced by membrane tension. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:704.
4. Bian, S., I. Favre, and E. Moczydlowski. 2001. Ca2+-binding activity of a COOH-terminal fragment of the Drosophila BK channel involved in Ca2+-dependent activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:4776-4781.
5. Blount, P., S.I. Sukharev, P.C. Moe, M.J. Schroeder, H.R. Guy, and C. Kung. 1996a. Membrane topology and multimeric structure of a mechanosensitive channel protein of Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 15:4798-4805.
6. Blount, P., S.I. Sukharev, M.J. Schroeder, S.K. Nagle, and C. Kung. 1996b. Single residue substitutions that change the gating properties of a mechanosensitive channel in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:11652-11657.
7. Chang, G., R.H. Spencer, A.T. Lee, M.T. Barclay, and D.C. Rees. 1998. Structure of the MscL homolog from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a gated mechanosensitive ion channel. Science. 282:2220-2226.
8. Cortes, D.M., L.G. Cuello, and E. Perozo. 2001. Molecular architecture of full-length KcsA: role of cytoplasmic domains in ion permeation and activation gating. J. Gen. Physiol. 117:165-180.
9. Cruickshank, C.C., R.F. Minchin, A.C. Le Dain, and B. Martinac. 1997. Estimation of the pore size of the large-conductance mechanosensitive ion channel of Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 73:1925-1931.
10. Darden, T., D. York, and L. Pedersen. 1993. Particle Mesh Ewald - an N.Log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98:10089-10092.
11. Elmore, D.E., and D.A. Dougherty. 2001. Molecular dynamics simulations of wild-type and mutant forms of the mycobacterium tuberculosis MscL channel. Biophys. J. 81:1345-1359.
12. Falke, J.J., and D.E. Koshland, Jr. 1987. Global flexibility in a sensory receptor: a site-directed cross-linking approach. Science. 237: 1596-1600.
13. Feller, S.E., Y.H. Zhang, R.W. Pastor, and B.R. Brooks. 1995. Constant-pressure molecular-dynamics simulation - the Langevin piston method. J. Chem. Phys. 103:4613-4621.
14. Fraczkiewicz, R., and W. Braun. 2002. Exact and efficient analytical calculation of the accessible surface areas and their gradients for macromolecules. J. Comp. Chem. 19:319-333.
15. Gullingsrud, J., D. Kosztin, and K. Schulten. 2001. Structural determinants of MscL gating studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 80:2074-2081.
16. Guy, H.R. 1985. Amino acid side-chain partition energies and distribution of residues in soluble proteins. Biophys. J. 47:61-70.
17. Hase, C.C., A.C. Le Dain, and B. Martinac. 1997. Molecular dissection of the large mechanosensitive ion channel (MscL) of E. coli: mutants with altered channel gating and pressure sensitivity. J. Membr. Biol. 157:17-25.
18. Humphrey, W., A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. 1996. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14:33-38.
19. Jones, D.T 1999. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292:195-202.
20. Kajava, A.V. 1996. Modeling of a five-stranded coiled coil structure for the assembly domain of the cartilage oligomeric matrix protein. Proteins. 24:218-226.
21. Kale, L., R. Skeel, M. Bhandarkar, R. Brunner, A. Gursoy, N. Krawetz, J. Phillips, A. Shinozaki, K. Varadarajan, and K. Schulten. 1999. NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J. Comp. Physics. 151:283-312.
22. Kneller, D.G., F.E. Cohen, and R. Langridge. 1990. Improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by an enhanced neural network. J. Mol. Biol. 214:171-182.
23. Kochendoerfer, G.G., J.M. Tack, and S. Cressman. 2002. Total chemical synthesis of a 27 kDa TASP protein derived from the MscL ion channel of M. tuberculosis by ketoxime-forming ligation. Bioconjug. Chem. 13:474-480.
24. Koprowski, P., and A. Kubalski. 1999. Glutathione (GSH) reduces the open probability of mechanosensitive channels in Escherichia coli protoplasts. Pflugers Arch. 438:361-364.
25. Kreusch, A., P.J. Pfaffinger, C.F. Stevens, and S. Choe. 1998. Crystal structure of the tetramerization domain of the Shaker potassium channel. Nature. 392:945-948.
26. Kumar, S., and R. Nussinov. 1999. Salt bridge stability in monomeric proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 293:1241-1255.
27. Levina, N., S. Totemeyer, N.R. Stokes, P. Louis, M.A. Jones, and I.R. Booth. 1999. Protection of Escherichia coli cells against extreme turgor by activation of MscS and MscL mechanosensitive channels: identification of genes required for MscS activity. EMBO J. 18:1730-1737.
28. Lomize, A.L., M.Y. Reibarkh, and I.D. Pogozheva. 2002. Interatomic potentials and solvation parameters from protein engineering data for buried residues. Protein Sci. 11:1984-2000.
29. MacKerell, A.D., D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R.L. Dunbrack,J.D. Evanseck, M.J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, et al. 1998. Allatom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:3586-3616.
30. Malashkevich, V.N., R.A. Kammerer, V.P. Efimov, T. Schulthess, and J. Engel. 1996. The crystal structure of a five-stranded coiled coil in COMP: a prototype ion channel? Science. 274:761-765.
31. Martinac, B. 2001. Mechanosensitive channels in prokaryotes. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 11:61-76.
32. Martinac, B., M. Buechner, A.H. Delcour, J. Adler, and C. Kung. 1987. Pressure-sensitive ion channel in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84:2297-2301.
33. Matulef, K., G.E. Flynn, and W.N. Zagotta. 1999. Molecular rearrangements in the ligand-binding domain of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. Neuron. 24:443-452.
34. Maurer, J.A., D.E. Elmore, H.A. Lester, and D.A. Dougherty. 2000. Comparing and contrasting Escherichia coli and mycobacterium tuberculosis mechanosensitive channels (MscL). New gain of function mutations in the loop region. J. Biol. Chem. 275:22238-22244.
35. Moe, P.C., P. Blount, and C. Kung. 1998. Functional and structural conservation in the mechanosensitive channel MscL implicates elements crucial for mechanosensation. Mol. Microbiol. 28:583-592.
36. Moe, P.C., G. Levin, and P. Blount. 2000. Correlating a protein structure with function of a bacterial mechanosensitive channel. J. Biol. Chem. 275:31121-31127.
37. Nakahira, K., M.F. Matos, and J.S. Trimmer. 1998. Differential interaction of voltage-gated K+ channel beta-subunits with cytoskeleton is mediated by unique amino terminal domains. J. Mol. Neurosci. 11:199-208.
38. Ouali, M., and R.D. King. 2000. Cascaded multiple classifiers for secondary structure prediction. Protein Sci. 9:1162-1176.
39. Pakula, A.A., and M.I. Simon. 1992. Determination of transmembrane protein structure by disulfide cross-linking: the Escherichia coli Tar receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 89:4144-4148.
40. Schreiber, M., and L. Salkoff. 1997. A novel calcium-sensing domain in the BK channel. Biophys. J. 73:1355-1363.
41. Sewing, S., J. Roepeir, and O. Pongs. 1996. Kv beta 1 subunit binding specific for shaker-related potassium channel alpha subunits. Neuron. 16:455-463.
42. Shapovalov, G., R. Bass, D.C. Rees, and H.A. Lester. 2003. Open-state disulfide cross-linking between M. tuberculosis mechanosensitive channel subunits. Biophys. J. 84:1132.
43. Shyng, S.L., C.A. Cukras, J. Harwood, and C.G. Nichols. 2000. Structural determinants of PIP(2) regulation of inward rectifier K(ATP) channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 116:599-608.
44. Sokolova, O., L. Kolmakova-Partensky, and N. Grigorieff. 2001. Three-dimensional structure of a voltage-gated potassium channel at 2.5 nm resolution. Structure. 9:215-220.
45. Spencer, R.H., G. Chang, and D.C. Rees. 1999. 'Feeling the pressure': structural insights into a gated mechanosensitive channel. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:448-454.
46. Sukharev, S. 2002. Purification of the small mechanosensitive channel of E. coli (MscS): the subunit structure, conduction and gating characteristics in liposomes. Biophys. J. 83:290-298.
47. Sukharev, S., M. Betanzos, C.S. Chiang, and H.R. Guy. 2001a. The gating mechanism of the large mechanosensitive channel MscL. Nature. 409:720-724.
48. Sukharev, S., S.R. Durell, and H.R. Guy. 2001b. Structural models of the MscL gating mechanism. Biophys. J. 81:917-936.
49. Sukharev, S.I., P. Blount, B. Martinac, F.R. Blattner, and C. Kung. 1994. A large-conductance mechanosensitive channel in E. coli encoded by mscL alone. Nature. 368:265-268.
50. Sukharev, S.I., B. Martinac, V.Y. Arshavsky, and C. Kung. 1993. Two types of mechanosensitive channels in the Escherichia coli cell envelope: solubilization and functional reconstitution. Biophys. J. 65:177-183.
51. Sukharev, S.I., M.J. Schroeder, and D.R. McCaslin. 1999a. Stoichiometry of the large conductance bacterial mechanosensitive channel of E. coli. A biochemical study. J. Membr. Biol. 171:183-193.
52. Sukharev, S.I., W.J. Sigurdson, C. Kung, and F. Sachs. 1999b. Energetic and spatial parameters for gating of the bacterial large conductance mechanosensitive channel, MscL. J. Gen. Physiol. 113: 525-540.
53. Vazquez-Laslop, N., H. Lee, R. Hu, and A.A. Neyfakh. 2001. Molecular sieve mechanism of selective release of cytoplasmic proteins by osmotically shocked Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 183:2399-2404.
54. Wesson, L., and D. Eisenberg. 1992. Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution. Protein Sci. 1:227-235.
55. Yoshimura, K., A. Batiza, M. Schroeder, P. Blount, and C. Kung. 1999. Hydrophilicity of a single residue within MscL correlates with increased channel mechanosensitivity. Biophys. J. 77:1960-1972.