Phylogenetic analysis of the repleta species group of the genus Drosophila using multiple sources of characters

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 296-307

  Durando, Celeste M ^a,b   Baker, Richard H ^b,c   Etges, William J ^d   Heed, William B ^e   Wasserman, Marvin ^a   Desalle, Rob ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^e University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA FASCIOLA; DROSOPHILA HYDEI; DROSOPHILA MERCATORUM; DROSOPHILA MULLERI; DROSOPHILA REPLETA;

EID: 0033865443     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0824     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allard M. W., Farris J. S., Carpenter J. M. Congruence among mammalian mitochondrial genes. Cladistics. 15:1999;75-84.
2. Baker R. H., DeSalle R. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian Drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46:1997;654-673.
3. Baker R. H., Yu X., DeSalle R. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:1998;427-436.
4. Bloomer P., Crowe T. M. Francolin phylogenetics: Molecular, morphobehavioral, and combined evidence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:1998;236-254.
5. Bremer K. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution. 42:1988;795-803.
6. Bremer K. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics. 10:1994;295-304.
7. Brower A. V. Z., DeSalle R., Vogler A. Gene trees, species trees, and systematics: A perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:1996;423-450.
8. Cho S., Mitchell A., Regier J. C., Mitter C., Poole R. W., Friedlander T. P., Zhao S. A highly conserved nuclear gene for low-level phylogenetics: Elongation factor-1a recovers a morphology-based tree for Heliothine moths. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;650-656.
9. Danforth B. N., Ji S. Elongation factor-1α occurs as two copies in bees: Implications for phylogenetic analysis of EF-1α sequences in insects. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1998;225-235.
10. DeSalle R., Freedman T., Prager E. M., Wilson A. C. Tempo and mode of sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 26:1987;157-164.
11. DeSalle R., Williams A. K., George M. Isolation and characterization of animal mitochondrial DNA. Zimmer E. A., White T. J., Cann R. L., Wilson A. C. Methods in Enzymology. 1993;176-204 Academic Press, New York.
12. Eriksson, T. 1997, AutoDecay Version 2.9.8, (Hypercard stock disk distributed by the author), Botoniska Institutionen, Stockholm Univ. Stockholm.
13. Farris J. S., Källersjö M., Kluge A. G., Bult C. Testing significance of congruence. Cladistics. 10:1994;315-320.
14. Farris J. S., Källersjö M., Kluge A. G., Bult C. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;570-572.
15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:1985;783-791.
16. Fontevila A., Wasserman M., Pla C., Pilares L., de Armengol R., Suyo M. P., Sanchez A., Vasquez J., Ruiz A., Garcia J. L. Description and evolutionary relationships of two species of the Drosophila mulleri cluster (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83:1990;444.
17. Gatesy J., DeSalle R., Wheeler W. C. Alignment-ambiguous nucleotide sites and the exclusion of data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:1994;152-157.
18. Gibson, T, Higgins, D, and, Thompson, J. 1994, ClustalX. Program and documentation available at, ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/software/mac/clustalw/clustalx .
19. Heed W. B., Sanchez A., Armengol R., Fontdevila A. Genetic differentiation among island populations and species of cactophilic Drosophila in the West Indies. Barker J. S. F., Starmer W. T., MacIntyre R. J. Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila. 1990;447-490 Plenum Press, New York.
20. Helm-Bychowski K., Cracraft J. Recovering phylogenetic signal from DNA sequences: Relationships within the corvine assemblage (Class Aves) as inferred from complete sequences of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome-b gene. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;1196-1214.
21. Kluge A. G. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:1989;7-25.
22. Knight A., Mindell D. P. Substitution bias, weighting of DNA sequence evolution, and the phylogenetic position of fea's viper. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;18-31.
23. Kwiatowski J., Ayala F. J. Phylogeny of Drosophila and related genera: Conflict between molecular and anatomical analyses. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13:1999;319-328.
24. Lemeunier F., David J., Tsacas L., Ashburner M. The melanogaster species group. Ashburner M. The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila. 1986;147-256 Academic Press, London, Orlando.
25. Martin A. Mitochondrial DNA sequence evolution in sharks: Rates, patterns, and phylogenetic inferences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;1114-1123.
26. Martin A. P., Bermingham E. Systematics and evolution of lower Central American cichlids inferred from analysis of cytochrome b gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:1998;192-203.
27. Murphy W. J., Collier G. E. A molecular phylogeny for Aplocheiloid fishes (Atherinomorpha, Cyprinodontiformes): The role of vicariance and the origins of annualism. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1997;790-799.
28. Remsen J., DeSalle R. Character congruence of multiple data partitions and the origin of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:1998;225-235.
29. Richardson R. H., Richardson M. E., Smouse P. E. Evolution of electrophoredtic mobility in the Drosophila mulleri complex. Markert C. L. Isozymes IV: Genetics and Evolution. 1975;533-545 Academic Press, New York.
30. Richardson R. H., Smouse P. E. Patterns of molecular variation. I. Interspecific comparison of electromorphs in the Drosophila mulleri complex. Biochem. Genet. 14:1976;447-465.
31. Richardson R. H., Smouse P. E., Richardson M. E. Patterns of molecular variation. II. Associations of electrophoretic mobility and larval substrate within species of the Drosophila mulleri complex. Genetics. 85:1977;141-154.
32. Ruiz A., Wasserman M. Evolutionary cytogenetics of the Drosophila buzzatii species complex. Heredity. 70:1993;582-596.
33. Russo C. A. M., Takezaki N., Nei M. Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Drosophilid species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;391-404.
34. Simon C., Frati F., Beckenbach A., Crespi B., Liu H., Flook P. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:1994;651-710.
35. Simons A. M., Mayden R. L. Phylogenetic relationships of the western North American phoxinins (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae) as inferred from mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal RNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:1998;308-329.
36. Spicer G. S. Phylogenetic utility of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase gene: Molecular evolution of the Drosophila buzzatii species complex. J. Mol. Evol. 41:1995;749-759.
37. Spicer G. S., Pitnick S. Molecular systematics of the Drosophila hydei subgroup as inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 43:1996;281-286.
38. Sullivan D. T., Atkinson P. W., Bayer C. A., Menotti-Raymond M. The evolution of Adh expression in the repleta group of Drosophila. Barker J. S. F., Starmer W. T., MacIntyre R. J. Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila. 1990;407-418 Plenum Press, New York.
39. Swofford, D. L. 1999, PAUP 4.01: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.01, Sinauer.
40. Throckmorton L. H. Pathways of evolution in the genus Drosophila and the founding of the repleta group. Barker J. S. F., Starmer W. T. Ecological Genetics and Evolution: The Cactus-Yeast-Drosophila Model System. 1982a;33-48 Academic Press, New York.
41. Throckmorton L. H. The virilis species group. Ashburner M. The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila. 1982b;227-296 Academic Press, London, New York.
42. Treier M., Pfeifle C., Tautz D. Comparison of the gap segmentation gene hunchback between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis reveals novel modes of evolutionary change. EMBO J. 1989.
43. Vilela C. R. A revision of the Drosophila repleta species group (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Rev. Brasil. Entomol. 27:1983;1-114.
44. Vogler A. P., DeSalle R., Assmann T., Knisley C. B., Schultz T. D. Molecular population genetics of the endangered tiger beetle Cicindela dorsalis (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86:1993;142-152.
45. Wasserman M. Cytological evolution in the Drosophila repleta species group. Barker J. S. F., Starmer W. T. Ecological Genetics and Evolution: The Cactus-Yeast-Drosophila Model System. 1982;49-64 Academic Press, New York.
46. Wasserman M. Cytological evolution of the Drosophila repleta species group. Krimbas C. B., Powell J. R. Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism. 1992;455-552 CRC Press, Boca Raton.
47. Yang Z. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 47:1998;125-133.
48. Yoder A. D., Cartmill M., Ruvolo M., Smith K., Vilgalys R. Ancient single origin for Malagasy primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;5122-5126.
49. Zouros E. Genetic differentiation associated with the early stages of speciation in the mulleri subgroup of Drosophila. Evolution. 27:1973;601-621.