The inheritance of female preference functions in a mate recognition system

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 267, Issue 1441, 2000, Pages 327-332

  Ritchie, Michael G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Behaviour; Courtship song; Female preference; Genetics; Speciation

Indexed keywords

CRICKET; RECOGNITION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ARTICLE; BASE MISPAIRING; FEMALE; INHERITANCE; INSECT; MALE; MATING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX LINKAGE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SINGING; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

EPHIPPIGER EPHIPPIGER; INSECTA; ORTHOPTERA; TETTIGONIIDAE;

EID: 0034701089     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1004     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bakker, T. C. M. 1993 Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature 363, 255-257.
2. Bakker, T. C. M. & Pomiankowski, A. 1995 The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J. Evol. Biol. 8, 129-171.
3. Basolo, A. L. 1999 Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 2223-2228.
4. Busnel. M. C. 1963 Caractérisation acoustique de populations d'Ephippiger écologiquement voisines. A. Epiphyties; 14, 25-34.
5. Butlin, R. K. 1993 Genetic variation in mating signals and responses. In Speciation and the recognition concept: theory and application (ed. J. Masters, D. M. Lambert & H. Spencer), pp. 327-366. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Butlin, R. K. & Ritchie, M. G. 1994 Mating behaviour and speciation. In Behaviour and evolution (ed. P. J. B. Slater & T. R. Halliday), pp. 43-79. Cambridge University Press.
7. Charlesworth, B., Coyne, J. A. & Barton, N. H. 1987 The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130, 113-146.
8. Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. 1989 Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43, 362-381.
9. Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. 1997 'Patterns of speciation in Drosophila' revisited. Evolution 51, 295-303.
10. Davies, N., Aiello, A., Mallet, J., Pomiankowski, A. & Silberglied, R. E. 1997 Speciation in two neotropical butterflies: extending Haldane's rule. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 845-851.
11. Duijm, M. 1990 On some song characteristics in Ephippiger (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidae) and their geographic variation. Neth. J. Zool. 40, 428-453.
12. Ewing, A. W. 1969 The genetic basis of sound production in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Anim. Behav. 17, 555-560.
13. Genstat 5 Commitee 1993 Genstat 5 release 3 reference manual. Oxford University Press.
14. Gerhardt, H. C. 1991 Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim. Behav. 42, 615-635.
15. Hartley, J. C. & Warne, A. C. 1984 Taxonomy of the Ephippiger ephippiger complex (ephippiger, cruciger and cunii) with special reference to the mechanics of copulation. Eos 60, 43-54.
16. Hastings, I. M. 1994 Manifestations of sexual selection may depend on the genetic basis of sex determination. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 258, 83-87.
17. Hastings, I. M. & Veerkamp. R. F. 1993 The genetic basis of response in mouse lines divergently selected for body weight or fat content. I. The relative contributions of autosomal and sex-linked genes. Gen. Res. Camb. 62, 169-175.
18. Hatfield, T. & Schluter, D. 1996 A test for sexual selection on hybrids of two sympatric species. Evolution 50, 2429-2434.
19. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. 1998 Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52, 1-7.
20. Hollocher, H., Ting, C.-T., Wu, M.-L. & Wu, C.-I. 1997 Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: extensive genetic divergence without reinforcement. Genetics 147, 1191-1201.
21. Hoy, R. R., Hahn, J. & Paul, R. C. 1977 Hybrid cricket auditory behavior: evidence for genetic coupling in animal communication. Science 195, 82-84.
22. Jennions, M. D. & Petrie, M. 1997 Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72, 283-327.
23. Kidd, D. M. & Ritchie, M. G. 2000 Inferring the patterns and causes of geographic variation in Ephippiger ephippiger (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) using geographical information systems. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. (Submitted.)
24. Lande, R. 1981 Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721-3725.
25. Noor, M. A. F. 1997 Genetics of sexual isolation and courtship dysfunction in male hybrids of Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution 51, 809-815.
26. Noor, M. A. F. 1999 Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83, 503-508.
27. Oudman, L., Duijm, M. & Landman, W. 1990 Morphological and allozyme variation in the Ephippiger ephippiger complex (Orthoptera: Tettigonioidae). Neth. J. Zool. 40, 454-483.
28. Pomiankowski, A. & Sheridan, L. 1994 Linked sexiness and choosiness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 242-244.
29. Price, T. 1998 Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 251-260.
30. Prowell, D. P. 1998 Sex linkage and speciation in Lepidoptera. In Endless forms: species and speciation (ed. D. J. Howard & S. H. Berlocher), pp. 309-319. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Reinhold, K. 1998 Sex linkage among genes controlling sexually selected traits. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44, 1-7.
32. Reinhold, K. 1999 Evolutionary genetics of sex-limited (traits under fluctuating selection. J. Evol. Biol. 12, 897-902.
33. Rice, W. R. 1984 Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38, 735-742.
34. Rice, W. R. & Holland, B. 1997 The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific red queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 1-10.
35. Ritchie, M. G. 1991 Female preference for 'song races' of Ephippiger ephippiger (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Anim. Behav. 42, 518-520.
36. Ritchie, M. G. 1992a Variation in male song and female preferences within a population of Ephippiger ephippiger (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Anim. Behav. 43, 845-855.
37. Ritchie, M. G. 1992b Behavioural coupling in tettigoniid hybrids (Orthoptera). Behav. Genet. 22, 369-379.
38. Ritchie, M. G. 1996 The shape of female mating preferences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14628-14631.
39. Ritchie, M. G. & Kyriacou, C. P. 1996 Artificial selection for a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 52, 603-611.
40. Ritchie, M. G. & Phillips, S. D. F. 1998 The genetics of sexual isolation. In Endless forms: species and speciation (ed. D. A. Howard & S. Berlocher), pp. 291-308. Oxford University Press.
41. Ritchie. M. G., Couzin, I. D. & Snedden, W. A. 1995 What's in a song? Female busherickets discriminate against the song of older males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 262, 21-27.
42. Ryan, M. J. & Rand, A. S. 1993 Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47, 647-657.
43. Ryan, M. J. & Rand, A. S. 1995 Female responses to ancestral advertisement calls in túngara frogs. Science 269, 390-392.
44. Schluter, D. 1988 Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42, 849-861.
45. Shaw, K. L. 1996 Polygenic inheritance of a behavioral phenotype: interspecific genetics of song in the Hawaiian cricket genus Laupala. Evolution 50, 256-266.
46. Sperling, F. A. H. 1994 Sex-linked genes and species differences in Lepidoptera. Can. Entomol. 126, 807-818.
47. Ting, C.-T., Tsaur, S.-C., Wu, M.-L. & Wu, C.-I. 1998 A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 282, 1501-1504.
48. Turner, G. F. 1999 Explosive speciation of African cichlid fishes. In Evolution of biological diversity (ed. A. E. Magurran & R. M. May), pp. 113-129. Oxford University Press.
49. Wagner, W. E. J. 1998 Measuring female mating preferences. Anim. Behav. 55, 1029-1042.
50. Wagner, W. E. J., Murray, A. M. & Cade. W. H. 1995 Phenotypic variation in the mating preferences of female crickets, Gryllus integer. Anim. Behav. 49, 1269-1281.
51. Welch, A. M., Semlitsch, R. D. & Gerhardt, H. C. 1998 Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. Science 280, 1928-1930.
52. Wheeler, D. A., Kyriacou, C. P., Greenacre, M. L., Yu, Q., Rutila, J. E., Rosbash, M. & Hall, J. C. 1991 Molecular transfer of a species-specific behavior from Drosophila simulans to Drosophila melanogaster. Science 251, 1082-1085.
53. Wilkinson, G. S., Presgraves, D. C. & Crymes. L. 1998 Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 391, 277-279.