Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: Variation in mating preference and correlation between sexes

Evolution

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 1175-1181

  Hollocher, Hope ^a   Ting, Chau Ti ^b,c   Pollack, Francine ^a   Wu, Chung I ^c  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic variation; Population differentiation; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

MATING PREFERENCE; SEXUAL ISOLATION; SPECIATION;

DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILIDAE; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 0030770023     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03965.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ANDERSON, V. L., AND R. A. MCLEAN. 1974. Design of experiments. Marcel Dekker, New York.
2. BEGUN, D., AND C. F. AQUADRO. 1993. African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature 365:548-550.
3. _. 1995. Evolution at the tip and base of the X chromosome in an African population of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:382-390.
4. COHET, Y., AND J. R. DAVID. 1980. Geographic divergence and sexual behavior: comparison of mating systems in French and Afrotropical populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 54:161-165.
5. DAVID, J. R., AND P. CAPY. 1988. Genetic vaiation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. Trends Genet. 4:106-111.
6. DAVIS, A. W., AND C.-I. WU. 1996. The broom of the sorcerer's apprentice: the fine structure of a chromosomal region causing reproductive isoaltion between two sibling species of Drosophila. Genetics 143:1287-1298.
7. DOBZHANSKY, T. 1970. Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
8. DUBILL, A. J. 1996. The evolution and biogeography of sexual isolation in sourthern African Drosophila. Bachelor's thesis, Princeton, Univ., Princeton, NJ.
9. FISHER, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
10. HENDERSON, N. R., AND D. M. LAMBERT. 1982. No significant deviation from random mating of worldwide populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 300:437-440.
11. HEY, J., AND R. M. KLIMAN. 1993. Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the D. melanogaster species complex. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:804-822.
12. HOLLOCHER, H., AND C.-I. WU. 1996. The genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: X vs. autosomal effects and male vs. female effects. Genetics 143:1243-1255.
13. IWASA, Y., AND A. POMIANKOWSKI. 1995. Continual change in mate preferences. Nature 377:420-422.
14. KANESHIRO, K. Y. 1983. Sexual selection and direction of evolution in the biosystematics of Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28:161-178.
15. _. 1989. The dynamics of sexual selection and founder effects in species formation. Pp. 279-296 in K. Y. K. L. V. Giddings and W. W. Anderson, eds. Genetics, speciation and the founder principle. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
16. KELLY, J. K., AND M. A. F. NOOR. 1996. Speciation by reinforcement: a model from studies of Drosophila. Genetics 143:1485-1497.
17. KIRKPATRICK, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1-12.
18. LACHAISE, D. M., M. CARIOU, J. R. DAVID, F. LEMEUNIER, AND L. TSACAS. 1988. The origin and dispersal of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup: a speculative paleogeographic essay. Evol. Biol. 22:159-225.
19. LANDE, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenie traits. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 78:3721-3725.
20. LEVINE, H. 1949. A new measure of sexual selection. Evolution 3:315-321.
21. MALOGOLOWKIN-COHEN, C., A. S. SIMMONS, AND H. LEVENE. 1965. A study of sexual isolation between certain strains of Drosophila paulistorurn. Evolution 19:95-103.
22. MARUYAMA, T., AND J. F. CROW. 1975. Heterozygous effects of X-ray induced mutations on viability of Drosophila melanogaster. Mutation Research 27:241-248.
23. MILLIKEN, G. A., AND D. E. JOHNSON. 1992. Analysis of messy data. Vol. I. Designed experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York.
24. PALOPOLI, M. F., A. W. DAVIS, AND C.-I. WU. 1996. Discord between the phylogenies inferred from molecular vs. functional data: uneven rates of functional evolution or low levels of gene flow? Genetics 144:1321-1328.
25. PROUT, T. 1971. The relation between fitness components and population prediction in Drosophila. I. The estimation of fitness components. Genetics 68:127-149.
26. SINGH, R. S., AND A. D. LONG. 1992. Geographic variation in Drosophila: from molecules to morphology and back. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:340-345.
27. TRUE, J. R., B. S. WEIR, AND C. C. LAURIE. 1996. A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics 142:819-837.
28. TSACAS, L., AND J. R. DAVID. 1974. Drosophila mauritiana, n. sp. du groupe melanogaster de l'ile Maurice (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Bull. Soc. Ent. Fr. 79:42-46.
29. WATANABE T. K., AND M. KAWANISHI. 1979. Mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila. Science 250:906-907.
30. WU, C.-I. 1985. A stochastic simulation study on speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 39:66-82.
31. WU, C.-I., AND M. F. PALOPOLI. 1994. Genetics of postmating reproductive isolation in animals. Annu. Rev. Genetics 28:283-308.
32. WU, C.-I., H. HOLLOCHER, D. J. BEGUN, C. F. AQUADRO, Y. XU, AND M.-L. Wu. 1995. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: a possible case of incipient speciation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 92:2519-2523.
33. WU, C.-I., N. A. JOHNSON, AND M. F. PALOPOLI. 1996. Haldane's rule and its legacy: why are there so many sterile males? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:281-284.