Structuring the universe of proteins

Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics

Volumn 3, Issue , 2002, Pages 243-262

  Burley, Stephen K ^a   Bonanno, Jeffrey B ^a  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Homology modeling; NMR spectroscopy; Structural genomics; X ray crystallography

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARCHAEBACTERIUM; BACTERIAL GENETICS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FUNGAL GENETICS; FUNGUS; GENE SEQUENCE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CARBOXY-LYASES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CAENORHABDITIS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FUNGI; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 0036408348     PISSN: 15278204     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genom.3.022502.103227     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Abola E, Kuhn P, Earnest T, Stevens RC. 2000. Automation of X-ray crystallography. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:970-72
2. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JZ, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389-402
3. Baker D, Sali A. 2001. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294:93-96
4. Ban N, Nissen P, Hansen J, Moore PB, Steitz TA. 2000. The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 Å resolution. Science 289:905-20
5. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:235-42
6. Bertone P, Kluger Y, Lan N, Zheng D, Christendat D, et al. 2001. SPINE: An integrated tracking database and data-mining approach for identifying feasible targets in high-throughput structural proteomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2884-98
7. Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. 2000. Structural genomics: An overview. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 73:289-95
8. Bonanno JB, Edo C, Eswar N, Pieper U, Romanowski MJ, et al. 2001. Structural genomics of enzymes involved in steroid/isoprenoid biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:12896-901
9. Bork P, Sander C, Valencia A. 1993. Convergent evolution of similar enzymatic function on different protein folds: The hexokinase, ribokinase, and galactokinase families of sugar kinases. Protein Sci. 2:31-40
10. Brenner SE, Barken D, Levitt M. 1999. The PRESAGE database for structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:251-53
11. Brenner SE, Chothia C, Hubbard T. 1997. Population statistics of protein structures: Lessons from structural classifications. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:369-76
12. Brenner SE, Levitt M. 2000. Expectations from structural genomics. Protein Sci. 9:197-200
13. Brünger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, DeLano WL, Gros P, et al. 1998. Crystallography and NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D54:905-21
14. Burley SK, Almo SC, Bonanno JB, Capel M, Chance MR, et al. 1999. Structural genomics: Beyond the human genome project. Nat. Genet. 23:151-57
15. Carter CW Jr, Carter CW. 1979. Protein crystallization using incomplete factorial experiments. J. Biol. Chem. 254:12219-23
16. Chance MR, Bresnick AR, Burley SK, Jiang J-S, Lima CD, et al. 2001. High-throughput structural biology: A pipeline for providing structures for the biologist. Protein Sci. 11:723-38
17. Cohen SL. 1996. Domain elucidation by mass spectrometry. Structure 4:1013-16
18. Daugherty M, Vonstein V, Overbeek R, Osterman A. 2001. Archaeal shikimate kinase, a new member of the GHMP-kinase family. J. Bacteriol. 183:292-300
19. Dietmann S, Holm L. 2001. Identification of homolgy in protein structure classification. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:953-57
20. Dietmann S, Park J, Notredame C, Heger A, Lappe M, Holm L. 2001. A fully automatic evolutionary classification of protein folds: DALI Domain Dictionary version 3. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:55-57
21. Edwards AM, Arrowsmith CH, Christendat D, Dharamsi A, Friesen JD, et al. 2000. Protein production: Feeding the crystallographers and NMR spectroscopists. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:970-72
22. Eisenreich W, Rohdich F, Bacher A. 2001. Deoxyxylulose phosphate pathway to terpenoids. Trends Plant Sci. 6:78-84
23. Erlandsen H, Abola EE, Stevens RC. 2000. Combining structural genomics and enzymology: Completing the picture in metabolic pathways and enzyme active sites. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:719-30
24. Ferre-D'Amare AR, Burley SK. 1995. Dynamic light scattering as a tool for evaluation crystallizability of macromolecules. In Methods in Enzymology, ed. RMS Charles, W Carter Jr, pp. 157-66. San Diego: Academic
25. Gilson M, Sharp K, Honig B. 1988. Calculating the electrostatic potential of molecules in solution: Method and error assessment. J. Comput. Chem. 9:327-35
26. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. 1990. Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature 343:425-30
27. Heinemann U. 2000. Structural genomics in Europe: Slow start, strong finish? Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:940-42
28. Heinemann U, Frevert J, Hofmann K-P, Illing G, Maurer C, et al. 2000. An integerated approach to structural genomics. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 73:347-62
29. Hendrickson W. 1991. Determination of macromolecular structures from anomalous diffraction of synchrotron radiation. Science 254:51-58
30. Higgins DG, Bleasby AJ, Fuchs R. 1992. CLUSTAL V: Improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:189-91
31. Hol W. 2000. Structural genomics for science and society. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:964-66
32. Holm L, Sander C. 1993. Families of structurally similar proteins, version 1.0. J. Mol. Biol. 233:123-38
33. Holm L, Sander C. 1993. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233:123-38
34. Horowitz NH. 1945. On the evolution of biochemical syntheses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 31:153-57
35. Jancarik J, Kim S-H. 1991. Sparse matrix sampling: A screening method for crystallization of proteins. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24:409-11
36. Kim S-H. 2000. Structural genomics of microbes: An objective. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:380-83
37. Kneidinger B, Graninger M, Puchberger M, Kosma P, Messner P. 2001. Biosynthesis of nucleotide-activated D-glycero-D-manno-heptose. J. Biol. Chem. 276:20935-44
38. Lamzin VS, Perrakis A. 2000. Current state of automated crystallographic analysis. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:978-81
39. Lange BM, Rujan T, Martin W, Croteau R. 2000. Isoprenoid biosynthesis: The evolution of two ancient and distinct pathways across genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13172-77
40. Laskowski RJ, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. 1993. PROCHECK: A program to check stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26:283-90
41. Linial M, Yona G. 2000. Methodologies for target selection in structural genomics. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 73:297-320
42. Liu J, Rost B. 2001. Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes. Protein Sci. 10:1970-79
43. Lo Conte L, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJ, Chothia C, Murzin AG. 2002. SCOP database in 2002: Refinements accommodate structural genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:264-67
44. Marti-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sanchez R, Melo F, Sali A. 2000. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29:291-325
45. Mittl PRE, Grutter MG. 2001. Structural genomics: Opportunities and challenges. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5:402-8
46. Moult J, Melamud E. 2000. From fold to function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:382-89
47. Norvell JC, Machalek AZ. 2000. Structural genomics programs at the US National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:931
48. Novelli G, Reichardt JK. 2000. Molecular basis of disorders of human galactose metabolism: Past, present, and future. Mol. Genet. Metab. 71:62-65
49. Orengo CA, Bray JE, Buchan DW, Harrison A, Lee D, et al. 2002. The CATH protein family database: A resource for structural and functional annotation of genomes. Proteomics 2:11-21
50. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. 1997. CATH - A hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5:1093-108
51. Orengo CA, Pearl FMG, Bray JE, Todd AE, Martin AC, et al. 1999. The CATH Database provides insights into protein structure/function relationship. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:275-79
52. Pervushin K, Riek R, Wider G, Wuthrich K. 1997. Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:12366-71
53. Ritz D, Lim J, Reynolds CM, Poole LB, Beckwith J. 2001. Conversion of a peroxiredoxin into a disulfide reductase by a triplet repeat expansion. Science 294:158-60
54. Romanowski MR, Bonanno JB, Burley SK. 2002. Crystal structure of Streptococcus pneumoniae phosphomevalonate kinase. Proteins 47:568-71
55. Sanchez R, Pieper U, Mirkovic N, de Bakker PI, Wittenstein E, Sali A. 2000. MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:250-53
56. Sanchez R, Sali A. 1998. Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:13597-602
57. Sheehan D, Meade G, Foley VM, Dowd CA. 2001. Structure, function and evolution of glutathione transferases: Implications for classification of non-mammalian members of an ancient enzyme superfamily. Biochem. J. 360:1-16
58. Skolnick J, Fetrow JS, Kolinski A. 2000. Structural genomics and its importance for gene functional analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 18:283-87
59. Stevens RC. 2000. High-throughput protein crystallization. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:558-63
60. Teichmann SA, Murzin AG, Chothia C. 2001. Determination of protein function, evolution and interactions by structural genomics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11:354-63
61. Terwilliger TC. 2000. Structural genomics in North America. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:935-39
62. Terwilliger TC. 2001. Maximum-likelihood density modification using pattern recognition of structural motifs. Acta Crystallogr. D57:1755-62
63. Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM. 2001. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J. Mol. Biol. 307:1113-43
64. Vaguine AA, Richelle J, Wodak SJ. 1999. SFCHECK: A unified set of procedures for evaluating the quality of macromolecular structure-factor data and their agreement with the atomic model. Acta Crystallogr. D55:191-205
65. Vitkup D, Melamud E, Moult J, Sander C. 2001. Completeness in structural genomics. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:559-66
66. Walsh MA, Dementieva I, Evans G, Sanishvili R, Joachimiak A. 1999. Taking MAD to the extreme: Ultrafast protein structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D55:1168-73
67. Yokoyama S, Hirota H, Kigawa T, Yabuki T, Shirouzu M, et al. 2000. Structural genomics projects in Japan. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:943-45
68. Zhang C, DeLisi C. 2001. Protein folds: Molecular systematics in three dimensions. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 58:72-79
69. Zhou T, Daugherty M, Grishin NV, Osterman AL, Zhang H. 2000. Structure and mechanism of homoserine kinase: Prototype for the GHMP kinase superfamily. Structure 8:1247-57