|
Volumn 160, Issue 1-3, 2001, Pages 219-226
|
Weight-of-evidence versus strength-of-evidence in toxicologic hazard identification: Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)
|
Author keywords
DEHP; Peroxisome proliferation; Phthalates; Risk assessment
|
Indexed keywords
HYDROGEN PEROXIDE;
PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR;
PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR ACTIVATED RECEPTOR;
PHTHALIC ACID BIS(2 ETHYLHEXYL) ESTER;
ANIMAL EXPERIMENT;
ANIMAL MODEL;
ARTICLE;
CARCINOGENESIS;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DNA RESPONSIVE ELEMENT;
DOSE RESPONSE;
FATTY ACID OXIDATION;
FEMALE;
HEPATOMEGALY;
HUMAN;
HYPERPLASIA;
LIVER CARCINOMA;
MALE;
MOUSE;
NEOPLASM;
NONHUMAN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROMOTER REGION;
PROTEIN EXPRESSION;
RAT;
RECEPTOR BINDING;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SPECIES DIFFERENCE;
TISSUE LEVEL;
ANIMALS;
CARCINOGENS;
DIETHYLHEXYL PHTHALATE;
DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG;
HUMANS;
MICE;
PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS;
PEROXISOMES;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RATS;
RECEPTORS, CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SPECIES SPECIFICITY;
TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;
ANIMALIA;
RODENTIA;
|
EID: 0035819853
PISSN: 0300483X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-483X(00)00451-0 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (30)
|
References (67)
|