Phylogeny of the Drosophila saltans species group based on combined analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 656-664

  O'Grady, Patrick M ^a,b   Clark, Jonathan B ^a   Kidwell, Margaret G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol dehydrogenase; Cytochrome oxidase I; Cytochrome oxidase II; Drosophila saltans phylogeny; ITS1; Taxonomic and character congruence

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; REPETITIVE DNA;

ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; DROSOPHILA; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY;

DROSOPHILA MILLERI; DROSOPHILA SALTANS; DROSOPHILA STURTEVANTI; ELLIPTICA SUBGROUP; PARASALTANS SUBGROUP; SALTANS SUBGROUP; STURTEVANTI SUBGROUP;

EID: 0031843061     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025969     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ARCHIE, J. 1989a. A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data. Syst. Zool. 34:239-252.
2. _. 1989b. Homoplasy excess ratios: new indices for measuring levels of homoplasy in phylogentic systematics and a critique of the consistency index. Syst. Zool. 38:239-252.
3. BAKER, R., and R. DESALLE. 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46:654-673.
4. BARRETT, M., M. J. DONOGHUE, and E. SOBER. 1991. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:486-493.
5. BECKENBACH, A. T., W. WEI, and H. LIU 1993. Relationships in the Drosophila obscura species group, inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:619-634.
6. BICUDO, H. E. M. C. 1973a. Reproductive isolation in the saltans group of Drosophila. I. The saltans subgroup. Genetica 44:313-329.
7. _. 1973b. Chromosomal polymorphism in the saltans group of Drosophila. I. The saltans subgroup. Genetica 44: 520-552.
8. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42:795-803.
9. _. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
10. BROWER, A. V. Z., R. DESALLE, and A. VOGLER. 1996. Gene trees, species trees, and systematics: a cladistic perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:423-450.
11. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, and P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
12. CHIPPINDALE, P. T, and J. J. WEINS. 1994. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:278-287.
13. DE QUEIROZ, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42:368-372.
14. DE QUEIROZ, A., M. J. DONOGHUE, and J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:657-681.
15. DONOGHUE, M. J., R. G. OLMSTEAD, J. F. SMITH, and J. D. PALMER. 1992. Phylogenetic relationships of Dipscales based on rbcL sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79:333-345.
16. EERNISSE, D. J., and A. G. KLUGE. 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and the phylogeny of amniotes inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1170-1195.
17. FARRIS, J. S., M. KALLERSJO, A. G. KLUGE, and C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of congruence. Cladistics 10:315-320.
18. _. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:570-572.
19. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phytogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
20. _. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 22:521-565.
21. GLOOR, G. B., and W. R. ENGELS. 1992. Single-fly DNA preps for PCR. Dros. Ivf. Serv. 71:148-149.
22. HUELSENBECK, J. P., and J. J. BULL. 1996. A likelihood ratio test to detect conflicting phylogenetic signal. Syst. Biol. 45: 92-98.
23. HUELSENBECK, J. P., J. J. BULL, and C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:152-158.
24. JONES, T. R., A. G. KLUGE, and A. J. WOLF. 1993. When theories and methodologies clash: a phylogenetic reanalysis of ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Syst. Biol. 42:92-102.
25. KLUGE, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
26. KLUGE, A. G., and J. S. FARRIS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18:1-32.
27. KLUGE, A. G., and A. J. WOLF. 1993. Cladistics: what's in a word? Cladistics 9:183-199.
28. MADDISON, W. P., and D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
29. MAGALHAES, L. E. 1962. Notes on taxonomy, morphology and distribution of the saltans group of Drosophila, with descriptions of four new species. Univ. Tex. Publ. 6205:135-154.
30. MAGALHAES, L. E., and J. S. BJÖRNBERG. 1957. Estudo da genitalia masculina de Drosophila do grupo saltans (Diptera). Rev. Bras. Biol. 17:435-450.
31. MICKEVICH, M. F. 1978. Taxonomic congruence. Syst. Zool. 27:143-158.
32. MIYAMOTO, M. M., and W. M. FITCH. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:64-76.
33. Russo, C. M., N. TAKEZAKI, and M. NEI. 1995. Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of drosophilid species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:391-404.
34. SIMON, C., F. FRATI, A. BECKENBACH, B. CRESPI, H. LIU, and P. FLOOK. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compliation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:651-701.
35. STURTEVANT, A. H. 1942. The classification of the genus Drosophila, with descriptions of nine new species. Univ. Tex. Publ. 4213:6-51.
36. SWOFFORD, D. 1997. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 4. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
37. THOMPSON, J. D., D. G. HIGGINS, and T. J. GIBSON. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
38. THROCKMORTON, L. H. 1975. The phylogeny, ecology and geography of Drosophila. Pp. 421-469 in R. C. KING, ed. Handbook of genetics. Vol. 3. Invertebrates of Genetic Interest. Plenum Press, New York.
39. THROCKMORTON, L. H., and L. E. MAGALHAES. 1962. Changes with evolution of pteridine accumulations in species of the saltans group of the genus Drosophila. Univ. Tex. Publ. 6205:489-505.
40. VOGLER, A. P., and R. DESALLE. 1994. Evolution and phylogenetic information content of the ITS-1 region in the tiger beetle Cicndeta dorsalis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:393-404.
41. WHEELER, W. C., and D. S. GLADSTEIN. 1994. MALIGN: a multiple sequence alignment program. J. Hered. 85:417-418.