Character Congruence of Multiple Data Partitions and the Origin of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 225-235

  Remsen, James ^a,b   Desalle, Rob ^a  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA 28S;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMETRY; CLASSIFICATION; DROSOPHILA; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BIOMETRY; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; DROSOPHILIDAE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HAWAII; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 28S;

EID: 0032041725     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1997.0484     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allard M. W., Carpenter J. M. On weighting and congruence. Cladistics. 1996.
2. Baker, R. DeSalle, R. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids.Syst. Biol.46.
3. Barrett M., Donoghue M. J., Sober E. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:1991;486-493.
4. Carson H. L. Chromosome tracers of the origin of species. Science. 168:1970;1414-1418.
5. Chippendale P. T., Wiens J. J. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;278-287.
6. Chomczynski P., Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 162:1987;156-159.
7. de Queiroz A., Donoghue M. J., Kim J. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:1995;657-681.
8. DeSalle R. The origin and possible time of divergence of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae: Evidence from DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:1992;905-916.
9. DeSalle R. Flies and congruence. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 94:1993;125-141.
10. DeSalle R., Brower A. V. Z., Baker R., Remsen J. A hierarchical view of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae (Diptera). Pacific Sci. 51:1997;462-474.
11. DeSalle R., Grimaldi D. Morphological and molecular systematics of the Drosophilidae. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22:1991;447-475.
12. DeSalle R., Williams A. K., George M. Isolation and characterization of animal mitochondrial DNA. Methods Enzymol. 224:1993;176-204.
13. Eriksson, T. 1996, AutoDecay, Botaniska Institutionen, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
14. Farris J. S., Kallersjo M., Kluge A. G., Bult C. Testing significance of congruence. Cladistics. 10:1994;315-319.
15. Farris J. S., Kallersjo M., Kluge A. G., Bult C. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;570-572.
16. Grimaldi D. A. A phylogenetic, revised classification of genera in the Drosophilidae (Diptera). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 197:1990;1-139.
17. Hardy D. E. Diptera: Cyclorhapha II, Series Schizophora, Section Acalypterae. I. Family Drosophilidae. Insects Hawaii. 12:1965;1-814.
18. Huelsenbeck J. P., Bull J. J., Cunningham C. W. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;152-158.
19. Kambysellis M. P., Ho K.-F., Craddock E. M., Piano F., Parisi M., Cohen J. Pattern of ecological shifts in the diversification of HawaiianDrosophila. Curr. Biol. 5:1995;1129-1139.
20. Kaneshiro K. Y. A revision of generic concepts in Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc. 22:1976;255-278.
21. Kaufman, J. Olson, S. Panagrossi, J. 1994, MacVector, Kodak Scientific Imaging Systems, New Haven.
22. Kluge A. G. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships amongEpicrates. Syst. Zool. 38:1989;7-25.
23. Kwiatowski J., Skarecky D., Bailey K., Ayala F. J. Phylogeny ofDrosophilaSod. J. Mol. Evol. 38:1994;443-454.
24. Mickevich, M. F. Farris, J. S. The implications of congruence inMenidia. Syst. Zool., 30, 351, 370.
25. Miller J. S., Brower A. V. Z., DeSalle R. Phylogeny of the neotropical moth tribe Josiini (Notodontidae: Dioptinae): Evidence from DNA sequences and morphology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60:1997;297-316.
26. Miyamoto M. M., Fitch W. M. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44(1):1995;64-76.
27. Nixon K. C., Carpenter J. M. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics. 12:1996;221-241.
28. Nunn, G. B. Thiesen, B. F. Christensen, B. Arctander, P. 1996, Simplicity-correlated size growth of the nuclear 285 ribosomal DNA D3 expansion segment in the crustacean order Isopoda.J. Mol. Evol., 42, 211, 223.
29. Pelandakis M., Solignac M. Molecular phylogeny ofDrosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 37:1993;525-543.
30. Olmstead R. G., Sweere J. A. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solenaceae. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;467-481.
31. Pelandakis M., Solignac M. Molecular phylogeny ofDrosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 37:1993;525-543.
32. Powell J. R., DeSalle R. Drosophila. Evolutionary Biology. 1995;Plenum, New York. p. 87-138.
33. Siddall, M. 1995, "ARNIE" computer program.
34. Spieth H. T. Courtship behavior of endemic Hawaiian Drosophila. Univ. Texas Publ. 6615:1966;245-313.
35. Stalker H. D. Intergroup phylogenies inDrosophila. Genetics. 70:1972;457-474.
36. Swofford, D. L. 1993, PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
37. Takada H. Male genitalia of some Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Univ. Texas Publ. 6615:1966;315-333.
38. Tamura K., Toba G., Park J., Aotsuka T. Origin of Hawaiian drosophilids inferred from alcohol dehydrogenase gene sequences. Nei M., Takahata N. Current Topics on Molecular Evolution. 1995;9-18 Pennsylvania State UniversityInst. Mol. and Evol. Genet.
39. Thomas R. H., Hunt J. A. Phylogenetic relationships inDrosophila: Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;362-374.
40. Throckmorton L. H. The relationships of the endemic Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Univ. Texas Publ. 6615:1966;335-396.
41. Throckmorton, L. H. 1975, The phylogeny, ecology, and geography ofDrosophila. In, Handbook of Genetics, R. C. King, 3, 421, 469, Plenum, New York.
42. Wheeler, W. Gladstein, D. 1992, MALIGN.
43. Yoder A. D. Relative position of the Cheirogaleidae in strepsirhine phylogeny: A comparison of morphological and molecular methods and results. Am. J. Physical Anthropol. 94:1994;25-46.