Language Networks: The New Word Grammar

Language Networks: The New Word Grammar

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 1-275

  Hudson, Richard ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85190076689     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199267309.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (302)

1. Abeillé, A. (2004). Building and using Parsed Corpora. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Abney, S. (1987). The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Ph.D. MIT.
3. Aitchison, J. (1994). Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Allerton, D. (1994). ‘Valency and valency grammar’, in R. Asher (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon. 4878-86.
5. Anderson, J. (1977). On Case Grammar: Prolegomena to a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Croom Helm.
6. Anderson, J. R. (1983). ‘A spreading activation theory of memory’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22: 261-95.
7. Anderson, J. R., and Lebiere, C. (1998). The Atomic Components of Thought. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
8. Anderson, S. (1992). A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Anderson, S. (1996). ‘How to put your clitics in their place, or why the best account of second-position phenomena may be something like the optimal one’. Linguistic Review, 13: 165-91.
10. Andrews, A. (1982). ‘The representation of case in Modern Icelandic’, in J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 427-503.
11. Aronoff, M. (1976). Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
12. Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
13. Baddeley, A., and Logie, R. (1999). ‘Working memory: the multiple-component model’, in A. Miyake and P. Shah (eds), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 28-61.
14. Baker, M. (1985). ‘Syntactic affixation and English gerunds’. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 4: 1-11.
15. Barabási, A.-L. (2003). Linked: How Everything is Connected to Everything Else and What it Means for Business, Science and Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
16. Barlow, M., and Kemmer, S. (2000). Usage Based Models of Language. Stanford, Calif.:CSLI.
17. Bates, E. (1998). ‘Construction grammar and its implications for child language research’. Journal of Child Language, 25: 462-6.
18. Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing Linguistic Morphology. 2nd edition. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
19. Beard, R. (1994). ‘Lexeme-morpheme base morphology’, in R. Asher (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon. 2137-40.
20. Berko Gleason, J. (1958). ‘The child’s learning of English morphology’.Word, 14: 150-77.
21. Bharati, A., Chaitanya, V., and Sangal, R. (1995). Natural Language Processing:A Paninian Perspective. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Private Ltd.
22. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
23. Blake, B. (1990). Relational Grammar. London: Croom Helm.
24. Blevins, J. P. (2001). ‘Paradigmatic derivation’. Transactions of the Philological Society, 99: 211-22.
25. Blevins, J. P. (2003). ‘Stems and paradigms’. Language, 79: 737-67.
26. Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
27. Bock, K., and Griffin, Z. (2000). ‘The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning?' Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 129: 177-92.
28. Bod, R. (1998). Beyond Grammar: An Experience-Based Theory of Language. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI.
29. Borer, H. (1992). ‘Clitics: pronominal clitics’, in W. Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 270-71.
30. Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Liversedge, S. P., Stewart, A. J., and Urbach, T. P. (1995). ‘Syntactic priming: investigating the mental representation of language’. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(6): 489-506.
31. Bresnan, J. (1978). ‘A realistic transformational grammar’, in M. Halle, J. Bresnan, and G. Miller (eds), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 1-59.
32. Bresnan, J. (1994). ‘Locative inversion and universal grammar’. Language, 70: 72-131.
33. Bresnan, J. (1997). ‘Mixed categories as head sharing constructions’, in M. Butt and T. Holloway King (eds), Proceedings of the LFG 97 Conference. Stanford, Calif.:CSLI Publications.
34. Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
35. Broadwell, G. (1999). ‘Focus alignment and optimal order in Zapotec’. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 35: 15-28.
36. Bröker, N. (1998). ‘A projection architecture for dependency grammar and how it compares to LFG’, in M. Butt and T. Holloway King (eds), Proceedings of the LFG 98 Conference. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI.
37. Bröker, N. (2000). ‘Unordered and non-projective dependency grammars’. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 41: 245-72.
38. Bröker, N. (2001). ‘Formal foundations of dependency grammar’, in V. Ágel (ed.), Dependency and Valency: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.
39. Brookes, A., and Hudson, R. (1982). ‘Do linguists have anything to say to teachers?', in R. Carter (ed.), Linguistics and the Teacher. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 52-74.
40. Brooks, P., and Macwhinney, B. (2000). ‘Phonological priming in children’s picture naming’. Journal of Child Language, 27: 335-66.
41. Brown, D., Corbett, G., Fraser, N., Hippisley, A., and Timberlake, A. (1996). ‘Russian noun stress and network morphology’. Linguistics, 34: 53-107.
42. Brown, P., and Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Browne, A., and Sun, R. (2001). ‘Connectionist inference models’. Neural Networks, 14: 1331-55.
44. Bybee, J. (1995). ‘Regular morphology and the lexicon’. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10: 425-55.
45. Bybee, J. (1998). ‘The emergent lexicon’. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 34: 421-35.
46. Bybee, J. (1999). ‘Use impacts morphological representation’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 1016-17.
47. Bybee, J., and Moder, C. (1983). ‘Morphological classes as natural categories’. Language, 59: 251-70.
48. Camdzic, A., and R. Hudson (2007). ‘Serbo-Croat clitics and word grammar’. Research in Language (University of Lodz), 4.
49. Carroll, J., Minnen, G., and Briscoe, T. (2004). ‘Parser evaluation: using a grammatical relation annotation Scheme’, in A. Abeille, (ed.), Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
50. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1992). Current Morphology. London: Routledge.
51. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1998). ‘Paradigmatic structure: inflectional paradigms and morphological classes’, in A. Spencer and A. Zwicky (eds), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford:Blackwell. 322-34.
52. Carston, R. (1997). ‘Relevance-theoretic pragmatics and modularity’. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 29-53.
53. Chametzky, R. (2003). ‘Phrase structure’, in R. Hendrick (ed.), Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell. 192-235.
54. Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, K., and Griffin, Z. (2000). ‘Structural priming as implicit learning: a comparison of models of sentence production’. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29: 217-29.
55. Charniak, E. (1981). ‘The case-slot identity theory’. Cognitive Science, 5: 285-92.
56. Chipere, N. (2003). Understanding Complex Sentences: Native Speaker Variation in Syntactic Competence. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
57. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
58. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
59. Chomsky, N. (1970). ‘Remarks on nominalizations’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in Transformational Grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn. 184-221.
60. Chomsky, N. (1995a). ‘Categories and transformations’, in N. Chomsky (ed.), The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 219-394.
61. Chomsky, N. (1995b). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
62. Clark, E. (1993). The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Collins, M. (1996). ‘A new statistical parser based on bigram lexical dependencies’. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 34: 184-91.
64. Corbett, G., and Fraser, N. (1993). ‘Network morphology: a DATR account of Russian nominal inflection’. Journal of Linguistics, 29: 113-42.
65. Covington, M. (1984). Syntactic Theory in the High Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Cowan, N. (1997). Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework. New York:Oxford University Press.
67. Cowan, N. (1999). ‘An Embedded-Processes Model of Working Memory’, in A. Miyake and P. Shah (eds), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62-101.
68. Creider, C. (2002). ‘Swahili verbal inflection in theoretical perspective’, in K. Sugayama (ed.), Studies in Word Grammar. Kobe: Research Institute of Foreign Studies, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies. 33-46.
69. Creider, C., and Hudson, R. (1999). Inflectional Morphology in Word Grammar. Lingua 107: 163-187.
70. Creider, C., and Hudson, R. (2006). ‘Case agreement in Ancient Greek: implications for a theory of covert elements’, in K. Sugayama and R. Hudson (eds), Word Grammar: New Perspectives on a Theory of Language Structure. London: Continuum. 35-53.
71. Crestani, F. (1997). ‘Application of spreading activation techniques in information retrieval’. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11: 453-82.
72. Croft, W. (1998). ‘The structure of events and the structure of language’, in M. Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. 67-92.
73. Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74. Croft, W., and Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Culicover, P. (1999). Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory and Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
76. Deacon, T. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. London: Penguin.
77. Denison, D. (1993). English Historical Syntax. London: Longman.
78. Denison, D. (1998). ‘Syntax’, in Romaine, S. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, volume iv: 1776-1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 92-329.
79. Dik, S. (1991). ‘Functional Grammar’, in F. Droste and J. Joseph (eds), Linguistic Theory and Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 247-74.
80. Donner, M. (1986). ‘The gerund in Middle English’. English Studies, 67: 394-400.
81. Dowty, D. (1991). ‘Thematic proto-roles and argument selection’. Language, 67:547-619.
82. Dowty, D. (2000). ‘The dual analysis of adjuncts/complements in categorial grammar’. ZAS Papers in Linguistics (Zentrum Für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin) 17: 1-26.
83. Durrell, M. (1996). Hammer’s German Grammar and Usage. 3rd edition. London:Arnold.
84. Ellis, N. (2002). ‘Reflections on frequency effects in language processing’. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24: 297-339.
85. Ellis, N., and Schmidt, R. (1998). ‘Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax’. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13: 307-36.
86. Elman, J. (1993). ‘Learning and development in neural networks-the importance of starting small’. Cognition, 48: 71-99.
87. Eppler, E. (2004). The syntax of German-English code-switching. Ph.D. UCL.
88. Ericsson, K. A., and Delaney, P. (1999). ‘Long-termworkingmemory as an alternative to capacity models of working memory in everyday skilled performance’, in A. Miyake and P. Shah (eds), Models ofWorkingMemory:Mechanisms of ActiveMaintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 257-97.
89. Ericsson, K. A., and Kintsch, W. (1995). ‘Long-term working-memory’. Psychological Review, 102: 211-45.
90. Evans, N., Brown, D., and Corbett, G. (2001). ‘Dalabon pronominal prefixes and the typology of syncretism: a Network Morphology analysis’, in G. Booij and J. van Marle, (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 2000. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 187-231.
91. Fanego, T. (1996a). ‘The development of gerunds as objects of subject-control verbs in English (1400-1700)'. Diachronica, 13: 29-62.
92. Fanego, T. (1996b). ‘The gerund in early modern English: evidence from the Helsinki corpus’. Folia Linguistica Historica 17: 97-152.
93. Ferrer i Cancho, R. (2004). ‘Euclidean distance between syntactically linked words’. Physical Review E, 70: 056135.
94. Ferrer i Cancho, R., and Solé, R. (2001). ‘The small world of human language’. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 268: 2261-65.
95. Ferrer i Cancho, R., and Solé, R. and Köhler, R. (2004). ‘Patterns in syntactic dependency networks’. Physical Review E, 69: 1-8.
96. Fillmore, C. (1968). ‘The case for case’, in E. Bach and R. Harms (eds), Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 1-90.
97. Fillmore, C., Kay, P., and O’Connor, M. (1988). ‘Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone’. Language, 64: 501-38.
98. Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M., and Chomsky, N. (2006). ‘The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications’. Cognition, 97: 179-210.
99. Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of the Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
100. Frazier, L. (1985). ‘Syntactic complexity’, in D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. M. Zwicky (eds), Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational and Theoretical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 129-89.
101. Gaifman, H. (1965). ‘Dependency systems and phrase-structure systems’. Information and Control, 8: 304-37.
102. Gentner, T., Fenn, K., Margoliash, D., and Nusbaum, H. (2006). ‘Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds’. Nature, 440: 1204-7.
103. Gibson, E. (1998). ‘Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies’. Cognition, 68: 1-76
104. Gibson, E. (2002). ‘The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity’. Cognition, 85: 79-112.
105. Giles, H., and Powesland, P. (1975). Speech Style and Social Evaluation. London:Academic Press.
106. Gisborne, N. (1996). English Perception Verbs. Ph.D. UCL, London.
107. Gisborne, N. (2006). ‘Factoring out the subject dependency’, in K. Sugayama and R. Hudson (eds), Not Known. London: Continuum.
108. Givón, T. (1998). ‘The functional approach to grammar’, in M. Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language. London: Lawrence Erlbaum. 41-66.
109. Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
110. Greenbaum, S. (1996). The Oxford English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
111. Griffin, R. (1991). Cambridge Latin Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112. Gruber, J. (1965). Studies in Lexical Relations. MIT.
113. Guy, G. (1994). ‘The phonology of variation’. Chicago Linguistics Society Parasession 30: 133-49.
114. Guy, G., and Boyd, S. (1990). ‘The development of a morphological class’. Language Variation and Change, 2: 1-18.
115. Haider, H. (1990). ‘Topicalization and other puzzles of German syntax’, in G. Grewendorf and W. Sternefeld (eds), Scrambling and Barriers. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 93-112.
116. Halle, M., and Marantz, A. (1993). ‘Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection’, in K. Hale and S. Keyser (eds), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 111-76.
117. Halliday, M. (1970). ‘Language structure and language function’, in Lyons, J. (ed.), New Horizons in Linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 140-65.
118. Halliday, M. (1977). ‘Text as semantic choice in social contexts’, in T. Van Dijk and J. Petofi (eds), Grammars and Descriptions (Studies in Text Theory and Text Analysis). New York: Walter de Gruyter. 176-225.
119. Halliday, M. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold.
120. Halliday, M. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
121. Halliday, M. (2002). On Grammar. New York: Continuum.
122. Harley, T. (1990). ‘Environmental contamination of normal speech’. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11: 45-72.
123. Harley, T. (1995). The Psychology of Language. Hove: Psychology Press.
124. Harris, Z. (1951). Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
125. Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.
126. Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T. (2002). ‘The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?' Science, 298: 1569-79.
127. Hawkins, J. A. (2001). ‘Why are categories adjacent?' Journal of Linguistics, 37: 1-34.
128. Hebb, D. (1949). The Organization of Behaviour. New York: Wiley.
129. Heringer, H.-J., Strecker, B., and Wimmer, R. (1980). Syntax: Fragen-Lösungen-Alternativen. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
130. Hiranuma, S. (1999). ‘Syntactic difficulty in English and Japanese: a textual study’. UCLWorking Papers in Linguistics, 11: 309-22.
131. Hirst, G. (1988). ‘Resolving lexical ambiguity computationally with spreading activation and Polaroid Words’, in S. Small, G. Cottrell, and M. Tanenhaus (eds), Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann. 73-107.
132. Holmes, J. (2005). Lexical Properties of English Verbs. Ph.D. UCL, London.
133. Holmes, J., and Hudson, R. (2006). ‘Constructions in word grammar’, in J.-O. Östman and M. Fried (eds), Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive Dimensions. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
134. Houston, A. (1989). ‘The English gerund: syntactic change and discourse function’, in R. Fasold and D. Schiffrin (eds), Language Change and Variation. Amsterdam:Benjamins. 173-95.
135. Huddleston, R. (1988). English Grammar: An Outline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
136. Hudson, R. (1964). A Grammatical Study of Beja. Ph.D. University of London.
137. Hudson, R. (1971). English Complex Sentences: An Introduction to Systemic Grammar. Amsterdam: North Holland.
138. Hudson, R. (1973). ‘An “item-and-paradigm” approach to Beja syntax and morphology’. Foundations of Language, 9: 504-48.
139. Hudson, R. (1974). ‘A structural sketch of Beja’. African Language Studies, 15: 111-42.
140. Hudson, R. (1976a). Arguments for a Non-transformational Grammar. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
141. Hudson, R. (1976b). ‘Beja’, in M. L. Bender (ed.), The Non-Semitic Languages of Ethiopia. East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University. 97-132.
142. Hudson, R. (1981a). ‘Some issues onwhich linguists can agree’. Journal of Linguistics, 17: 333-44.
143. Hudson, R. (1981b). ‘Wanna and the lexicon’. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 10: 132-54.
144. Hudson, R. (1984). Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
145. Hudson, R. (1990). English Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
146. Hudson, R. (1992). Teaching Grammar: A Guide for the National Curriculum. Oxford:Blackwell.
147. Hudson, R. (1995). Does English really have case? Journal of Linguistics, 31: 75-392.
148. Hudson, R. (1996). Sociolinguistics, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
149. Hudson, R. (1998). English Grammar. London: Routledge.
150. Hudson, R. (1999). ‘Subject-verb agreement in English’. English Language and Linguistics, 3: 173-207.
151. Hudson, R. (2000a). ‘I amn’t’. Language, 76: 297-323.
152. Hudson, R. (2000b). ‘Discontinuity’. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 41: 15-56.
153. Hudson, R. (2000c). ‘Grammar without Functional Categories’, in R. Borsley (ed.), The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories. New York: Academic Press. 7-35.
154. Hudson, R. (2001a). ‘Clitics inWord Grammar’.UCLWorking Papers in Linguistics, 13: 243-94.
155. Hudson, R. (2001b). ‘Grammar teaching and writing skills: the research evidence’. Syntax in the Schools, 17: 1-6.
156. Hudson, R. (2002). ‘Richard Hudson’, in K. Brown and V. Law (eds), Linguistics in Britain:Personal Histories. Oxford: Blackwell. 127-38.
157. Hudson, R. (2003a). ‘Case-agreement, PRO and structure sharing’. Research in Language, 1: 7-33.
158. Hudson, R. (2003b). ‘Gerunds without phrase structure’. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21: 579-615.
159. Hudson, R. (2003c). ‘Mismatches in default inheritance’, in E. Francis and L. Michaelis (eds), Mismatch: Form-Function Incongruity and the Architecture of Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI. 269-317.
160. Hudson, R. (2003d). ‘Trouble on the left periphery’. Lingua, 113: 607-42.
161. Hudson, R. (2004a). ‘Are determiners heads?' Functions of Language, 11: 7-43.
162. Hudson, R. (2004b). ‘Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa)'. Journal of Linguistics, 40: 105-30.
163. Hudson, R. (2006a). ‘Buying and selling in Word Grammar’, in J. Andor and P. Pelyvás (eds), Empirical, Cognitive-Based Studies in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
164. Hudson, R. (2006b). ‘Wanna revisited’. Language, 82.
165. Hudson, R. (2007a). ‘Word Grammar’, in H. Cuyckens and D. Geeraerts (eds), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
166. Hudson, R. (2007b). ‘Word Grammar, cognitive linguistics and second-language learning and teaching’, in P. Robinson and N. Ellis (eds), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
167. Hudson, R. and Holmes, J. (2000). ‘Re-cycling in the Encyclopedia’, in B. Peeters (ed.), The Lexicon/Encyclopedia Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 259-90.
168. Hudson, R. Rosta, A., Holmes, J., and Gisborne, N. (1996). ‘Synonyms and syntax’. Journal of Linguistics, 32: 439-46.
169. Hudson, R. and Walmsley, J. (2005). ‘The English Patient: English grammar and teaching in the twentieth century’. Journal of Linguistics, 41: 593-622.
170. Jack, G. (1988). ‘The origins of the English gerund’. Nowele, 12: 15-75.
171. Jackendoff, R. (1977). X-bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
172. Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
173. Jackendoff, R. (1997). The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
174. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
175. Jaeger, J., Lockwood, D., Kemmerer, R., Van Valin, R., Murphy, B., and Khalek, H. (1996). ‘A positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English’. Language, 72: 451-98.
176. James, L., and Burke, D. (2000). ‘Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults’. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26: 1378-91.
177. Jorgensen, E. (1981). ‘Gerund and to-infinitive after it-is-(of)-no-use, it-is-no-good, and it-is-useless’. English Studies, 62: 156-63.
178. Joshi, A., and Rambow, O. (2003). ‘A Formalism for Dependency Grammar Based on Tree Adjoining Grammar’, in S. Kahane and A. Nasr (eds), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory. Paris:École Normale Supérieure.
179. Kaiser, L. (1997). ‘CPR for Korean Type III Nominalizations’, in L. Kaiser (ed.), Yale A-Morphous Linguistics Essays. New Haven: Yale University, Linguistics Dept. 89-99.
180. Kaiser, L. (1999). The Morphosyntax of Clausal Nominalization Constructions. Ph.D. Yale.
181. Karlsson, F. (1995). Constraint Grammar: A Language-Independent System for Parsing Unrestricted Text. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
182. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
183. Kay, P. (2002). ‘An informal sketch of a formal architecture for construction grammar’. Grammars, 5: 1-19.
184. Kay, P. and Fillmore, C. (1999). ‘Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations:the what’s X doing Y? construction’. Language, 75: 1-33.
185. Keenan, E. (1976). ‘Towards a universal definition of “subject” ', in C. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 303-33.
186. Kempson, R., and Quirk, R. (1971). ‘Controlled activation of latent contrast’. Language, 47: 548-72.
187. Klein, D., and Manning, C. (2004). ‘Corpus-based induction of syntactic structure:models of dependency and constituency’. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2004) 42: 478-85.
188. Kreps, C. (1997). Extraction, Movement and Dependency Theory. Ph.D. UCL.
189. Kuzar, R. (1998). ‘Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure’. Journal of Pragmatics, 29: 359-62.
190. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.
191. Labov, W. (1989). ‘The child as linguistic historian’. LanguageVariation and Change, 1: 85-97.
192. Labov, W. (2001). Principles of Linguistic Change, vol. ii: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
193. Laird, J., Newell, A., and Rosenbloom, P. (1987). ‘Soar: an architecture for general intelligence’. Artificial Intelligence, 33: 1-64.
194. Lamb, S. (1966). Outline of Stratificational Grammar. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
195. Lamb, S. (1971). ‘The crooked path of progress in cognitive linguistics’, in R. J. O’Brien (ed.), Linguistics: Developments of the Sixties-Viewpoint for the Seventies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
196. Lamb, S. (1998). Pathways of the Brain: The Neurocognitive Basis of Language. Amsterdam:Benjamins.
197. Langacker, R. (1998). ‘Conceptualization, symbolization and grammar’, in M. Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 1-39.
198. Langacker, R. (2000). ‘A dynamic usage-based model’, in M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (eds), Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI. 1-63.
199. Langenhove, G. C. van (1925). On the Origin of the Gerund in English. Grand: van Rysselberghe & Rombaut.
200. Lapointe, S. (1993). ‘Dual lexical categories and the syntax of mixed category phrases’, in A. Kathol and M. Bernstein (eds), Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference of Linguistics. 199-210.
201. Lecarme, J. (1978). ‘Aspects syntaxiques des complétives du Grec’. Ph.D. University of Montreal.
202. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., and Meyer, A. S. (1999). ‘A theory of lexical access in speech production’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 1-45.
203. Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
204. Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. (1991). ‘Wiping the slate clean: a lexical semantic exploration’, in B. Levin and S. Pinker (eds), Lexical and Conceptual Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell. 123-51.
205. Lewis, R. (1996). ‘Interference in short-term memory: the magical number two (or three) in sentence processing’. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25: 93-115.
206. Lieberman, P. (2002). ‘On the nature and evolution of the neural bases of human language’. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement: Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 119: 36-62.
207. Lin, D. (2004). ‘Dependency-based evaluation of Minipar’, in A. Abeillé (ed.), Building and Using Parsed Corpora. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
208. Liu, H., and R. Hudson (2006). ‘Measuring dependency distance based on a Chinese treebank’. Anon.
209. Luger, G., and Stubblefield, W. (1993). Artificial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving. New York: Benjamin Cummings.
210. Macdonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., and Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). ‘Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution’. Psychological Review, 101: 676-703.
211. Macwhinney, B. (1989). ‘Competition and teachability’, in M. Rice and R. Schiefelbusch (eds), The Teachability of Language. Baltimore: Brookes. 63-104.
212. McClelland, J., and Rumelhart, D. (1988). Explorations in parallel distributed processing:a handbook of models, programs, and exercises. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
213. McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., and Tanenhaus, M. (1998). ‘Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension’. Journal of Memory and Language, 38: 283-312.
214. Malouf, R. (1998). ‘Mixed categories in the hierarchical lexicon’. Ph.D. Stanford University.
215. Malouf, R. (2000). Mixed categories in the hierachical lexicon. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
216. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1984). ‘Function and structure in spoken word recognition’, in H. Bouma and D. Bouwhuis (eds), Attention and Performance, vol x: Control of Language Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
217. Meara, P. (2002). ‘Modelling attrition in vocabularies’, in A. Hauksdóttir, B. Arnbjörnsdóttir, M. Gardharsdóttir, and S. Þorvaldsdóttir (eds), Forskning i Nordiske Sprog Som Andet-Og Fremmedsprog. Reykjavík: Háskóli Islands. 153-75.
218. Meidner, O.M. (1994). ‘Emotive meaning’, in R. Asher (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon. 1111.
219. Mel’cuk, I. (1997). Vers une linguistique sens-texte. Paris: Collège de France: Chaire Internationale.
220. Michaelis, L., and Lambrecht, K. (1996). ‘Toward a construction-based theory of language function: the case of nominal extraposition’. Language, 72: 215-47.
221. Miller, G. (1956). ‘The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information’. Psychological Review, 63: 81-97.
222. Milroy, L. (1980). Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
223. Miyake, A., and Shah, P. (1999). ‘Toward unified theories of working memory:emerging general consensus, unresolved theoretical issues and future research directions’, in A. Miyake and P. Shah (eds), Models ofWorking Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 442-81.
224. Mollá, D., Schneider, G., Schwitter, R., and Hess, M. (2000). ‘Answer extraction using a dependency grammar in Extrans’. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 41: 145-78.
225. Ninio, A. (1994). ‘Predicting the order of acquisition of three-word constructions by the complexity of their dependency structure’. First Language, 14: 119-52.
226. Ninio, A. (1996). ‘A proposal for the adoption of dependency grammar as the framework for the study of language acquisition’, in G. Ben Shakhar and A. Lieblich (eds), Volume in Honor of Shlomo Kugelmass. Jerusalem: Magnes. 85-103.
227. Ninio, A. (1998). ‘Acquiring a dependency grammar: the first three stages in the acquisition of multiword combinations in Hebrew-speaking children’, in G. Makiello-Jarza, J. Kaiser, and M. Smolczynska (eds), Language Acquisition and Developmental Psychology. Cracow: Universitas.
228. Nivre, J. (2004). ‘Incrementality in deterministic dependency parsing’. Anon.
229. Nivre, J., Hall, J., and Nilsson, J. (2004). ‘Memory-based dependency parsing’ in H. T. Ng and E. Riloff (eds), Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), May 6-7, 2004. Boston, Mass.: 49-56.
230. Owens, J. (1988). The Foundations of Grammar: An Introduction to Mediaeval Arabic Grammatical Theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
231. Pake, J. (1998). The Marker Hypothesis: A Constructivist Theory of Language Acquisition. Ph.D. Edinburgh.
232. Percival, K. (1990). ‘Reflections on the history of dependency notions in linguistics’. Historiographia Linguistica, 17: 29-47.
233. Pickering, M., and Barry, G. (1991). ‘Sentence processing without empty categories’. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6: 259.
234. Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct. London: Penguin.
235. Pinker, S. (1998). ‘Words and rules’. Lingua, 106: 219-42.
236. Pollard, C., and Sag, I. (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago:Chicago University Press.
237. Postal, P. (1966). ‘On so-called “pronouns” in English’. Monographs on Languages and Linguistics, 19: 177-206.
238. Poutsma, H. (1923). The Infinitive, the Gerund and the Participles of the English Verb. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
239. Pullum, G. (1991). ‘English nominal gerund phrases as noun phrases with verb-phrase heads’. Linguistics, 29: 763-99.
240. Quillian, M. R. (1968). ‘Semantic memory’, in M. Minsky (ed.), Semantic Information Processing. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
241. Quillian, M. R., and Collins, A. M. (1969). ‘Retrieval time from semantic memory’. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8: 240-7.
242. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
243. Rambow, O., and Joshi, A. (1994). ‘A formal look at dependency grammars and phrase-structure grammars, with special consideration of word-order phenomena’, in L. Waner, (ed.), Current Issues in Meaning-Text Theory. London: Pinter.
244. Reisberg, D. (1997). Cognition: Exploring the Science of the Mind. New York: Norton.
245. Richards, N. (2004). ‘Against bans on lowering’. Linguistic Inquiry, 35: 453-64.
246. Robins, R. H. (2001). ‘In Defence of WP’ (Reprinted from TPHS, 1959). Transactions of the Philological Society, 99: 114-44.
247. Robinson, J. (1970). ‘Dependency structure and transformational rules’. Language, 46: 259-85.
248. Robinson, P. (1986). ‘Constituency or dependency in the units of language acquisition? An approach to describing the learner’s analysis of formulae’. Linguisticae Investigationes, 10: 417-37.
249. Roelofs, A. (1997). ‘The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production’. Cognition, 64: 249-84.
250. Roland, D. (2001). Verb sense and verb subcategorization probabilities. Ph.D. University of Colorado.
251. Rosch, E. (1976). ‘Classification of real-world objects: origins and representations in cognition’ in S. Ehrlich, and E. Tulving (eds), La Mémoire sémantique. Paris:Bulletin de Psychologie. Reprinted in P. Johnson-Laird and P. C. Wason (eds) (1977) Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 212-22.
252. Rosta, A. (1997). English Syntax and Word Grammar Theory. Ph.D. UCL, London.
253. Rosta, A. (2005). ‘Structural and distributional heads’, in K. Sugayama and R. Hudson (eds), Word Grammar: New Perspectives on a Theory of Language Structure. London:Continuum. 171-203.
254. Rosta, A. (2006). ‘Structural and distributional heads’, in K. Sugayama and R. Hudson (eds), Word Grammar: New Perspectives on a Theory of Language Structure. London:Continuum.
255. Rumelhart, D., and McClelland, J. (1986). ‘On learning the past tenses of English verbs’, in J. McClelland and D. Rumelhart (eds), Parallel Distributed Processing:Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol. ii: Psychological and Biological Models. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
256. Rushton, J. N. (2004). ‘Natural language parsing using simple neural networks’, in Anon., Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
257. Rusteberg, F. G. A. (1874). Historical Development of the Gerund in the English Language. Göttingen: Druck der Dieterichischen Univ-Buchdruckerei.
258. Sadock, J. (1991). Autolexical Syntax: ATheory of Parallel Grammatical Representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
259. Sag, I. (1997). ‘English relative clause constructions’. Journal of Linguistics, 33: 431-83.
260. Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
261. Saussure, F. de (1959). Course in General Linguistics (trans. by W. Baskin; French edition 1916). Lausanne: Payot.
262. Seyfarth, R., Cheney, D., and Bergman, T. (2005). ‘Primate social cognition and the origins of language’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9: 264-66.
263. Sgall, P., Hajicova, E., and Panevova, J. (1986). The Meaning of the Sentence in its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Prague: Academia.
264. Shieber, S. (1986). An Introduction to Unification-based Approaches to Grammar. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
265. Siewierska, A. (1991). Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
266. Smith, N. V. (1999). Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
267. Solé, R. (2005). ‘Syntax for free?' Nature, 434: 289.
268. Somers, H. (1984). ‘On the validity of the complement-adjunct distinction in valency grammar’. Linguistics, 22: 507-31.
269. Sperber, D., andWilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford:Blackwell.
270. Sproat, R. (1988). ‘Bracketing paradoxes, cliticization and other topics: the mapping between syntactic and phonological structure’, in M. Everaert, A. Evers, R. Huybregts, and M. Trommelen (eds), Morphology and Modularity: in Honour of Henk Schultink. Dordrecht: Foris. 339-60.
271. Steedman, M. (2000). The Syntactic Process. London: MIT Press.
272. Stump, G. (1993). ‘On rules of referral’. Language, 69: 449-79.
273. Sturt, P., Pickering, M., Scheepers, C., and Crocker, M. (2001). ‘The preservation of structure in language comprehension: is reanalysis the last resort?' Journal of Memory and Language, 45: 283-301.
274. Sutcliffe, R., Koch, H.-D., and McElligott, A. (1996). Industrial Parsing of Software Manuals. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
275. Swan, M. (1995). Practical English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
276. Tajima, M. (1985). The Syntactic Development of the Gerund in Middle English. Tokyo:Nanun-do.
277. Talmy, L. (1988). ‘Force dynamics in language and cognition’. Cognitive Science, 12:49-100.
278. Tesnière, L. (1959). Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
279. Tomasello, M. (1998). ‘Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure’. Journal of Child Language, 25: 431-42.
280. Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. London: Harvard University Press.
281. Tomasello, M. (2000). ‘The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4: 156-63.
282. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: AUsage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press.
283. Touretzky, D. (1986). The Mathematics of Inheritance Systems. Los Altos, Calif.:Morgan Kaufmann.
284. Tzanidaki, D. (1996). The Syntax and Pragmatics of Subject and Object Position in Modern Greek. Ph.D. UCL.
285. Tzanidaki, D. (1998). ‘Clause structure and word order in Modern Greek’, in B. Joseph, G. Horrocks, and I. Philippaki-Warburton (eds), Themes in Greek Linguistics 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 229-54.
286. Van Langendonck, W. (1987). ‘Word Grammar and child grammar’. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 2: 109-32.
287. Van Valin, R. (1993). Advances in Role and Reference Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
288. Vosse, T., and Kempen, G. (2000). ‘Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar’. Cognition, 75: 105-43.
289. Warneken, F., and Tomasello, M. (2006). ‘Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees’. Science, 311: 1301-3.
290. Wells, R. (1947). ‘Immediate constituents’. Language, 23: 81-117.
291. Wescoat, M. (1994). ‘Phrase structure, lexical sharing, partial ordering and the English gerund’. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20: 587-98.
292. Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
293. Wik, B. (1973). English Nominalizations in -ing: Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
294. Williams, E. (1984). ‘Grammatical relations’. Linguistic Inquiry, 15: 639-74.
295. Williams, S., Savage-Rumbaugh, S., and Rumbaugh, D. M. (1994). ‘Apes and language’, in R. Asher (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon. 139-46.
296. Winograd, T. (1976). ‘Towards a procedural understanding of semantics’. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 30: 260-303.
297. Wurff, W. v. d. (1993). ‘Gerunds and their objects in the Modern English period’, in J. v. Marle (ed.), Historical Linguistics 1991. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 363-75.
298. Wurff, W. van den (1997). ‘Gerunds in the Modern English period: structure and change’. History of English, 3: 163-96.
299. Yoon, J. (1996). ‘Nominal gerund phrases in English as phrasal zero derivations’. Linguistics, 34: 329-56.
300. Zwicky, A. (1977). On clitics. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
301. Zwicky, A. (1992a). ‘Clitics: an overview’, in W. Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 269-70.
302. Zwicky, A. (1992b). ‘Morphology: morphology and syntax’, in W. Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10-12.