Paradigmatic derivation

Transactions of the Philological Society

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 211-222

  Blevins, James P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25844480911     PISSN: 00791636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-968X.00080     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. ANDERSON, STEPHEN R., 1982. 'Where's morphology'. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 571-612
2. ANDERSON, STEPHEN R., 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
3. AUSTERLITZ, ROBERT, 1966. Finnish Reader and Glossary. The Hague: Mouton
4. BLOOMFIELD, LEONARD, 1933. Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
5. BOOIJ, GEERT, 1993. 'Against split morphology'. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, 27-49. Dordrecht: Kluwer
6. BOOIJ, GEERT, 1996. 'Inherent verses contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis'. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, 1-16. Dordrecht: Kluwer
7. DI SCIULLO, ANNE-MARIE, and WILLIAMS, EDWIN, 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: MIT Press
8. LIEBER, ROCHELLE, 1980. On the Organization of the Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics
9. MATTHEWS, PETER H., 1991. Morphology, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10. ROBINS, R. H., 1959. 'In defence of WP'. Transactions of the Philological Society, 116-144. Reproduced in this volume
11. ROBINS, R. H., 1989. General Linguistics, fourth edition. London: Longman
12. STUMP, GREGORY T., 2001. Inflectional Morphology: a Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press