The English Patient: English grammar and teaching in the twentieth century

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 593-622

  Hudson, Richard ^a   Walmsley, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844600712     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226705003464     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. Adamson, J. W. (1907). The practice of instruction: a manual of method general and special. London: National Society's Depository.
2. Allen, D. (1980). English teaching since 1965: how much growth? London: Heinemann.
3. Andrews, R., Beverton, S., Locke, T., Low, G., Robinson, A., Torgerson, C. & Zhu, D. (2004). The effect of grammar-teaching (syntax) in English on 5 to 16 year olds' accuracy and quality in written composition. 〈http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/EPPIWebContent/reel/review_groups/english/eng_rv6/ eng_rv6.pdf〉
4. Anon (1911). On the terminology of grammar; being the Report of the Joint Committee on Grammatical Terminology. Revised. London: John Murray.
5. Anon (1964). The examining of English language: Eighth Report of the Secondary Schools Examination Council. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
6. Anon (1984). English from 5 to 16: ccurriculum matters 1. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
7. Anon (1988). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of English Language (The Kingman Report). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
8. Anon (1989). English for ages 5 to 16 (The Cox Report). London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
9. Anon (1998a). National Literacy Strategy: framework for teaching. London: Department for Education and Science.
10. Anon (1998b). The grammar papers. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
11. Anon (1999a). A fresh start: improving literacy and numeracy. London: Basic Skills Agency.
12. Anon (1999b). Raising the standards of teacher education and training: initial teacher training. National Curriculum for primary English. London: Teacher Training Agency.
13. Anon (1999c). The National Curriculum for England: English. London: Department for Education and Employment & the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
14. Anon (2000). Grammar for writing. London: Department for Education and Employment.
15. Anon (2003a). Framework for teaching modern foreign languages: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: Department for Education and Science.
16. Anon (2003b). New perspectives on spoken English in the classroom: discussion papers. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
17. Anon (2004). Introducing the grammar of talk. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
18. Asher, R. E. (ed.) (1994). Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (10 vols.). Oxford: Pergamon.
19. Bain, E. & Bain, R. (1996). The grammar book. Sheffield: National Association for Teachers of English.
20. Bain, E. & Bain, R. (2003). The grammar book supplement. Sheffield: National Association for Teachers of English.
21. Bain, R. & Bridgewood, M. (1988). The primary grammar book. Sheffield: National Association for Teachers of English.
22. Barnes, D. R., Thomson, J. & Watson, K. (1978). Language in the classroom. Parkville, Vic.: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.
23. Barton, G. & Hudson, R. (2002). Grammar-teaching: grind or glamour? Times Education Supplement 1 February (Curriculum Special). 6-7.
24. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
25. Board of Education (1907). Regulations and Syllabus for the examination of candidates for admission as pupil-teachers, 1907. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office.
26. Board of Education (1909). Regulations and Syllabus for the examination of candidates for admission as pupil-teachers, 1909. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office.
27. Board of Education (1921). The teaching of English in England (The Newbolt Report). London: His Majesty's Stationery Office. [Later edition 1938.]
28. Brooke, C. N. L. (1993). A history of the University of Cambridge, vol. IV: 1870-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Bryan, W. F. (1936). The Preterite and the Perfect Tense in Present Day English. Journal of English and German Philology 35. 363-382.
30. Bullock, S. A. (1975). Language for life (The Bullock Report). London: Department for Education and Science.
31. Cajkler, W. & Hislam, J. (2002). Trainee teachers' grammatical knowledge: the tension between public expectations and individual competence. Language Awareness II. 161-177.
32. Carter, R. (ed.) (1990). Knowledge about language and the curriculum: the LINC reader. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
33. Carter, R. (1994). English teaching in England and Wales: key reports. In Asher (ed.), 1137-1138.
34. Carter, R. (1996). Politics and knowledge about language: the LINC project. In Hasan, R. & Williams, G. (eds.), Literacy in society. London: Longman. 1-28.
35. Cawley, F. (1957). The difficulty of English grammar for pupils of secondary school age. MEd thesis, University of Manchester.
36. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
37. Cobuild (1990). Collins COBUILD English grammar. London: Collins.
38. Collins, J. C. (1887). Petition addressed to the Hebdomadal Council for the foundation of a School of Modern Literature. The Quarterly Review 164. 241-269.
39. Collins, J. C. (1891). The study of English literature: a plea for its recognition and organization at the universities. London: Macmillan.
40. Crystal, D. (1995). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Curme, G. O. (1935). A grammar of the English language: parts of speech and accidence. Boston: Heath.
42. Daunt, M. (1950). Literature is a branch of language. Universities Quarterly 5. 138-150.
43. Dixon, J (1967). Growth through English. Reading: National Association for the Teaching of English.
44. Elley, W., Barham, I., Lamb, H. & Wyllie, M. (1979). The role of grammar in a secondary school curriculum. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
45. English Association (1923). The problem of grammar (English Association Pamphlet 56). English Association.
46. Fries, C. (1940). American English grammar: the grammatical structure of Present-Day American English with especial reference to social differences or class dialects. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.
47. Fries, C. (1951). The structure of English: an introduction to the construction of English sentences. London: Longman.
48. Funke, O. (1950). Englische Sprachkunde: Ein Überblick ab 1935. Bern: Francke.
49. Gleason, H. (1961). An introduction to descriptive linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
50. Gragg, G. (1994). Babylonian grammatical texts. In Asher (ed.), 296-298.
51. Grattan, J. H. J. & Gurrey, P. (1925). Our living language: a new guide to English grammar. London & Edinburgh: Nelson.
52. Greenbaum, S. (1996). The Oxford English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Gurrey, P. (1961). Teaching English grammar. London: Longman.
54. Halliday, M. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17. 241-292.
55. Halliday, M. (1967a). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
56. Halliday, M. (1967b). Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part 1). Journal of Linguistics 3. 37-82.
57. Halliday, M. (1967c). Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part 2). Journal of Linguistics 3. 199-244.
58. Halliday, M. (1968). Notes on transitivity and theme in English (part 3). Journal of Linguistics 4. 179-216.
59. Halliday, M. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
60. Halliday, M., McIntosh, A. & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.
61. Harris, Z. (1951). Structural linguistics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
62. Hawkins, E. (1987). Awareness of language: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Hill, A. (1958). Introduction to linguistic structures: from sound to sentence in English. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
64. Hockett, C. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
65. Holbrook, D. (1961). English for maturity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Honey, J. (1997). Language is power: the story of Standard English and its enemies. London: Faber & Faber.
67. Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Hudson, R. (1992). Teaching grammar: a guide for the National Curriculum. Oxford: Blackwell.
69. Hudson, R. (1995). Does English really have case? Journal of Linguistics 31. 375-392.
70. Hudson, R. (1998). Is grammar teachable? English 4-11 2. 11-14.
71. Hudson, R. (1999). Grammar-teaching is dead - NOT! In Wheeler, R. (ed.), Language alive in the classroom. Westport: Greenwood. 101-112.
72. Hudson, R. (2001). Grammar-teaching and writing skills: the research evidence. Syntax in the Schools 17. 1-6.
73. Hudson, R. (2004). Why education needs linguistics (and vice versa). Journal of Linguistics 40. 105-130.
74. 3 Strategy. 〈www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dick/kal/top.htm〉
75. Keith, G. (1990). Language study at Key Stage 3. In Carter (ed.), 69-103.
76. Kruisinga, E. (1911). A handbook of Present-Day English, 5th edition 1931-1932. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
77. Leech, G. & Short, M. (1981). Style in fiction. London: Longman.
78. Macauley, W. J. (1947). The difficulty of grammar. British Journal of Educational Psychology 17. 153-162.
79. Mittins, W. (1948). The dilemma of grammar. Journal of Education 80. 124-126.
80. Mittins, W. (1959). The teaching of English in schools. In Quirk & Smith (eds.), 87-109.
81. Mittins, W. (1962). A grammar of Modern English. London: Methuen.
82. Nesfield, J. C. (1900). Outline of English grammar. In five parts. London: Macmillan.
83. Olson, G., Faigley, L. & Chomsky, N. (1991). Language, politics and composition: a conversation with Noam Chomsky. Journal of Advanced Composition II. 1-35.
84. O'Malley, R. (1966). Note. Use of English 18. 206-207.
85. Palmer, H. (1924). A grammar of spoken English, on a strictly phonetic basis. Cambridge: Heffer.
86. Pearce, J. (1994). Schools Council (UK): English teaching program. In Asher (ed.), 3683-3684.
87. Perera, K. (1984). Children's writing and reading: analysing classroom language. Oxford: Blackwell.
88. Philp, A. (1994). English grammar in British schools, 1960-1990. In Asher (ed.), 1127-1131.
89. Quirk, R. (1960). Towards a description of English usage. Transactions of the Philological Society. 40-61.
90. Quirk, R. (1962). The use of English. London: Longman.
91. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
92. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
93. Quirk, R. & Smith, A. H. (eds.) (1959). The teaching of English. London: Martin Seeker and Warburg. [Reprinted 1964 by Oxford University Press.]
94. Roberts, P. (1967). Modern grammar. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.
95. Schools Council (1968). Young school leavers. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
96. Shayer, D. (1972). The teaching of English in schools 1900-1970. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
97. Short, M. (1996). Exploring the language of poetry, prose and drama. London: Longman.
98. Strang, B. (1962). Modern English structure. London: Arnold.
99. Stubbs, M. (1986). Educational linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
100. Sweet, H. (1892-1898). A new English grammar logical and historical (2 vols.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
101. Thompson, D. (ed.) (1969). Directions in the teaching of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
102. Thouless, R. H. (1969). A map of educational research. Reading: National Foundation for Educational Research.
103. Treble, H. A. & Vallins, G. H. (1936). An ABC of English usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
104. Trudgill, P. (1975). Accent, dialect and the school. London: Arnold.
105. Walmsley, J. (1984). The uselessness of formal grammar? (CLIE Pamphlet 2). London: Committee for Linguistics in Education.
106. Walmsley, J. (1989). The Sonnenschein v. Jespersen controversy. In Fries, U. & Heusser, M. (eds.), Meaning and beyond; Ernst Leisi zum 70. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag. 253-281.
107. Westaway, F. W. (1933). The teaching of English grammar: function versus form. London & Glasgow: Blackie.
108. Whitehead, F. S. (1966). The disappearing dais: a study of the principles and practice of English teaching. London: Chatto & Windus.
109. Williamson, J. & Hardman, F. (1995). Time for refilling the bath? A study of primary student-teachers' grammatical knowledge. Language and Education 9. 117-134.
110. Wilson, R. (1969). Language. In Thompson (ed.), 153-167.
111. Wyse, D. (2001). Grammar for writing? A critical review of empirical evidence. British Journal of Educational Studies 49. 411-427.
112. Zandvoort, R. W. (1952). A critique of Jespersen's Modern English grammar. Etudes Anglaises 5. 2-10.