Understanding complex sentences: Native speaker variation in syntactic competence

Understanding Complex Sentences: Native Speaker Variation in Syntactic Competence

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-248

  Chipere, Ngoni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85030214743     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230005884     Document Type: Book

References (261)

1. Aborn, M. and Rubenstein, H. 1952. 'Information Theory and Immediate Recall', Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 260-266.
2. Anderson, J. R. 1974a. 'Verbatim and propositional representation of sentences in immediate and long-term memory', Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, Apr., 13/2, 149-162.
3. Anderson, J. R. 1974b. 'Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory', Cognitive Psychology, 6,451-474.
4. Anderson, J. R. and Bower, G. H. 1980. HumanAssociative Memory. NewJersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Anglin, J. M. and Miller, G. A. 1968. 'The role of phrase structure in the recall of meaningful verbal material', Psychonomic Science, 10/10, 343-344.
6. Atkinson, R. C. and Schiffrin, R. M. 1968. 'Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes', in K. Spence andJ. Spence (eds). The Psychology of Learningand Motivation, 2,89-195. New York: Academic Press.
7. Auster, C. J. 1980. 'Balance theory and other extra-balance properties: An application to fairy tales', Psychological Reports, 47/1, 183-188.
8. Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working Memory. New York: OUP.
9. Baddeley, A. D. 1990. Human Memory: Theoryand Practice. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
10. Baddeley, A. D. and Hitch, G.J. 1974. 'Working memory', in G. H. Bower (ed.). The Psychology ofLearningand Motivation, 8, 47-90. New York: Academic Press.
11. Baddeley, A. D. Thompson, N. and Buchanan, M. 1975. Journal of Verbal Learningand Verbal Behaviour, 14/6,575-589.
12. Barabasi, A. 2002. Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
13. Baruzzi, A. 1982. 'Effects of Degree of Education on the Comprehension of Syntactic Structures in Normal and Aphasic Populations', McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, 2,56-74.
14. Bates, E., Bretherton, I. and Snyder, L. 1988. From First Words To Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
15. Bates, E., Masling, M. and Kintsch, W. 1978. 'Recognition memory for aspects of dialogue', Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Learningand Memory, 4/3, 187-197.
16. Berko,J. 1958. 'The child's learning of English morphology', Word, 14, 150-177.
17. Bever, T. G. 1970. 'The cognitive basis for linguistic structures', in J. R. Hayes (ed.). Cognition and the DevelopmentofLanguage, 279-352. New York: Wiley.
18. Bever, T. G. 1988. 'The psychological reality of grammar: a student's eye-view of cognitive science', in W. Hirst (ed.). The Making of Cognitive Science: Essays in Honourof George A. Miller, 112-142. Cambridge: CUP.
19. Bever, T. G. Kirk, R. and Lackner, J. 1969. 'An autonomic reflection of syntactic structure', Neuropsychologia, 7/1, 23-28.
20. Bever, T. G. Lackner,J. R. and Kirk, R. 1969. 'The underlying structures of sentences are the primary units of immediate speech processing', Perception and Psychophysics, 5/4, 225-234.
21. Biber, D. 1983. 'Differential Competence in Somali: Evidence from the acquisition of Noun Definitisation', Journal ofPsycholinguistic Research, 12/3, 275-295.
22. Blaubergs, M. and Braine, M. 1974. 'Short-term memory limitations on decoding self-embedded sentences', Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 102/4, 745-774.
23. Bloomfield, L. 1926. 'A set of postulates for the science of language', Language, 2, 153-164.
24. P. H. Matthews. 2001. A ShortHistoryofStructural Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.
25. Bloomfield, L. 1927. 'Literate and Illiterate Speech', AmericanSpeech, 2, 432-439.
26. Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Bloomfield, L. 1936. 'Language or ideas?', Language, 12, 89-95.
28. P. H. Matthews. 1993. Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: CUP.
29. Blumenthal, A. 1966. 'Observations with self-embedded sentences', Psychonomic Science, 6/10, 453-454.
30. Bock, K. and Loebell, H. 1990. 'Framing sentences', Cognition, Apr., 35/1, 1-39.
31. Bock, K. and Loebell, H. Dell, G., Griffin, Z., Chang, F. and Ferreira, V. 1996. 'Structural priming as implicit learning', Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November 1996.
32. Bod, R. (1998). Beyond Grammar: An Experience-Based Theory of Language. CSLI Publications: Cambridge University Press.
33. Boeree, C. G. 2000. Psychology: The Beginnings. http://www.ship.edu/-cgboeree/ psychbeginnings.html.
34. Boot, M. 1976. 'Linguistic Data Structure, Reducing Encoding by Hand, and Programming Languages', in A.Jones and R. F. Churchhouse (eds). The Computer in Literary and Linguistics Studies, 255-270. Cardiff: The University of Wales Press.
35. Bower, G. H. and Winzenz, D. 1969. 'Group structure, coding and memory for digit series', Journal ofExperimental Psychology Monograph, 80/2 (Pt. 2), 1-17.
36. Branigan, H., Pickering, B. and Stewart, A. 1997. 'Syntactic priming of ambiguous sentences in language comprehension', Language and Cognitive Processes. Unpublished manuscript.
37. Branigan, H., Pickering, B. and Stewart, A. Pickering, B., Liversedge, S., Stewart, A. and Urbach, T. 1995. 'Syntactic Priming', Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24/6, 489-506.
38. Cantor, J. and Engle, R. W. 1993. 'Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: An individual-differences approach', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1101-1114.
39. Caplan, D. and Waters, G. 1999. 'Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Feb., 22/1, 77-126.
40. Charness, N. 1976. 'Memory for chess positions: Resistance to interference', Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Learningand Memory, 2, 641-653.
41. Charness, N. 1979. 'Components of skill in bridge', CanadianJournal of Psychology, 33,1-6.
42. Chase, W. G. and Ericsson, K. A. 1982. 'Skill and working memory', in G. H. Bower (ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 16, 1-58. New York: Academic Press.
43. Chase, W. G., and Simon, H. A. 1973. 'The mind's eye in chess', in W. G. Chase (ed.). Visual Information Processing, 215-281. New York: Academic Press.
44. Cheung, H. and Kemper, S. 1992. 'Competing complexity metrics and adults' production of complex sentences', AppliedPsycholinguistics, 13/1, 53-76.
45. Chi, M. T. H. 1976. 'Short-term memory limitations in children. Capacity or processing deficits?', Memoryand Cognition, 4/5, 559-572.
46. Chomsky, C. 1969. The Acquisition ofSyntax in Children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Chomsky, N. 1956. 'Three models for the description of language', IRE Transactions ofInformation Theory, IT-2, 113-124.
48. Chomsky, N. 1957. SyntacticStructures. Mouton: The Hague.
49. Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theoryof Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Chomsky, N. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought, New York: Harper & Row.
51. Chomsky, N. 1967. 'The formal nature of language', in E. H. Lenneberg (ed.). Biological Foundations of Language, 397-442. New York: Wiley & Sons.
52. Chomsky, N. 1980. 'Comments', in M. Piatelli-Palmarini (ed.). Language and Learning. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
53. Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Christiansen, M. H. and Chater, N. 1999. 'Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance', Cognitive Science.
55. Christidis, A. 1985. 'On generativity: Theory and pre-theory in transformational generative grammar', Lingua, 66, 201-224.
56. Conrad, R. and Hull, A. 1964. 'Information, acoustic confusion and memory span', British Journal ofPsychology, 55/4, 429-432.
57. Costa-Pereira, D. J. and Maskill, R. 1983. 'Structure and process in pupils' essays: A graphical analysis of the organisation of extended prose', British Journal of Educational-Psychology, 53/1, 100-106.
58. Cowan, N., Day, L., Saults, J. S., Kellar, T. A., Johnson, T. and Flores, L. 1992. 'The role of verbal output time in the effects of word-length on immediate memory', Journal ofMemoryand Language, 31,1-17.
59. Craik, F. I. and Lockhart, R. S. 1972. 'Levels of processing: A framework for memory research', Journal of Verbal Learningand Verbal Behaviour, 11,671-684.
60. Craik, F. I. and Lockhart, R. S. and Tulving, E. 1975. 'Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory', Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Sep., 104/3, 268-294.
61. Cromer, W. 1970. 'The difference model: a new explanation for some reading difficulties', Journal ofEducationalPsychology, 61/6, 471-483.
62. Crutcher, R.J. 1990. 'The role of mediation in knowledge acquisition and retention: Learning foreign vocabulary using the keyword method', TechReportNo. 90-10. Boulder: University of Colorado, Institute of Cognitive Science.
63. Crutcher, R.J. 1992. 'The effects of practice on retrieval of foreign vocabulary learned using the keyword method', dissertation, The University of Colorado at Boulder.
64. Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D. C. and Corley, M. M. B. 1996. 'Parsing in different languages', in M. Carreiras, J. E. Garcia-Albea etal. (ed.). Language processing in Spanish, 145-187. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
65. Cupples, L. and Holmes, V. M. 1987. 'Reading skill and interpretation of temporary structural ambiguity', Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 179-203.
66. Cupples, L. and Holmes, V. M. 1992. 'Evidence for a difference in syntactic knowledge between skilled and less skilled adult readers', Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21/4, 249-275.
67. Dabrowska, E. 1997. 'The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists', Linguistics, 35/4, 735-766.
68. Dailey, C. A. 1959. 'Graph theory in the analysis of personal documents', Human-Relations, 12, 65-75.
69. Daneman, M. and Carpenter, P. A. 1980. 'Individual differences in working memory and reading', Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
70. Day, R. S. 1969. 'Temporal order judgements in speech: Are individuals languagebound or stimulus-bound?', Paper presented at the 9th meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St Louis.
71. Day, R. S. 1979. 'Verbal Fluency and the Language-Bound Effect', in C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler and W. S. Wang, Individual Differences In Language Ability and Language Behavior, 57-84. New York: Academic Press.
72. Deese, J. and Kaufman, R. A. 1957. 'Serial effects in recall of unorganised and sequentially organised verbal material', Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 180-187.
73. De Fazio, V.J. 1973. 'Field articulation differences in language abilities', Journal ofPersonality and SocialPsychology, 25/3, 351-356.
74. de Groot, A. 1978. Thought and Choiceand Chess. Mouton: The Hague. (Original work published 1946).
75. de Saussure, F. 1916/1990. Course in General Linguistics. London: Duckworth.
76. Devlin, K. 2000. The Maths Gene: Why Everyone Has It But Most People Don't Use It. Guernsey: Guernsey Press.
77. Ellis, R. and Humphreys, G. 1999. Connectionist Psychology. Hove: Psychology Press.
78. Elman, J. L. 1990. 'Finding Structure in Time', Cognitive Science, 14/2, 179-211.
79. Elman, J. L. 1992. 'Grammatical Structure and distributed Representations', in S. Davis (ed.). Connectionism: Theoryand Practice. Oxford: OUP.
80. Engle, R. W. and Bukstel, L. H. 1978. 'Memory processes among bridge players of differing expertise', American Journal ofPsychology, 91, 673-689.
81. Epstein, W. 1961a. 'The influence of syntactical structure on learning', American Journal ofPsychology, 74, 80-85.
82. Epstein, W. 1961b. 'A Further Study of the influence of syntactical structure on learning', American Journal ofPsychology, 75, 121-126.
83. Ericsson, K. A. and Chase, W. G. 1992. 'Exceptional memory', AmericanScientist, 70, 607-615.
84. Ericsson, K. A. and Kintsch, W. 1995. 'Long-term working memory', Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
85. Eysenck, M. W. 1979. 'Depth, elaboration and distinctiveness', in L. S. Cermak and F. 1. M. Craik (eds). Levels ofprocessingin human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
86. Eysenck, M. W. and Keane, M. T. 1995. Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook. Hove: Psychology Press.
87. Ferguson, C. A. 1979. 'Phonology as an Individual Access System: Some Data from Language Acquisition', in C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler and W. S. Wang. Individual Differences In Language Ability and Language Behavior, 189-202. New York: Academic Press.
88. Fillenbaum, S. 1971. 'Psycholinguistics', Annual ReviewofPsychology, 22,251-308.
89. Fitts, P. M. and Switzer, G. 1962. 'Cognitive aspects of information processing: The familiarity of S-Rsets and sub-sets', Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 63, 321-329.
90. Fletcher, C. R. 1994. 'Levels of representation in memory for discourse', in M. A. Gernsbacher etal. (eds). Handbook ofpsycholinguistics, 589-607. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.
91. Fodor,J. A. 1983. ModularityofMind. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
92. Fodor,J. A. and Bever, T. G. 1965. 'The psychological reality of linguistic segments', Journal of Verbal Learningand VerbalBehaviour, 4, 414-420.
93. Fodor,J. A. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. 1988. 'Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis', Cognition, 28/1-2, 3-71.
94. Fodor,J. A. Bever, T. G. and Garret, M. F. 1974. The psychology of language. New York: McGraw Hill.
95. Forney, G. D. 1973. 'The Viterbi Algorithm', Proceedings of the IEEE, 61/3, 268.
96. Frase, L. T. 1969. Depth of processing text: Application of graph theory to recall changes induced by the logical analysis of text', Proceedings of the Annual conventionof the AmericanPsychological Association, 4/2, 617-618.
97. Frazier, L. 1987. 'Sentence Processing: A tutorial review', in M. Coltheart (ed.). Attention and Performance XII: The psychology of reading. London: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
98. Frazier, L. 1995. 'Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing', Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24/6, 437-467.
99. Frazier, L. Taft, L., Clifton, C., Roeper, T. and Ehrlich 1984. 'Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension', Memory and Cognition 1984, Sep., 12/5,421-430.
100. Freedle, R. and Craun, M. 1970. 'Observations with self-embedded sentences using written aids', Perception and Psychophysics, 7/4, 247-249.
101. Garret, M., Bever, T. and Fodor, J. 1966. 'The active use of grammar in speech perception', Perception and Psychophysics, 1,30-32.
102. Garside, R. 1987. 'The CLAWS word-tagging system', in R. Garside, G. Leech and G. Sampson (eds), The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-based Approach. London: Longman.
103. Geer, S. E., Gleitman, H. and Gleitman, L. 1971. 'Paraphrasing and remembering compound words', Journal ofVerbal Learningand Verbal Behaviour, 11, 348-355.
104. Gernsbacher, M. and Faust, M. 1991. 'The mechanism of suppression: Acomponent of general comprehension skill', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17/2,245-262.
105. Gernsbacher, M., Varner, K. R. and Faust, M. E. 1990. 'Individual differences in general comprehension skills', Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16,430-445.
106. Gibson, E. and Thomas, J. 1999. 'Memory Limitations and Structural Forgetting: The Perception of Complex Ungrammatical Sentences as Grammatical', Language and Cognitive Processes, 14/3,225-248.
107. Gleitman, I. R.and Gleitman, H. 1970. Phrase andParaphrase. New York: W. W. Norton.
108. Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
109. Goldberg, A. 1995. 'Construction Grammar', in K. Brown andJ. Miller (eds). Concise Encyclopedia of Syntactic Theories. Cambridge: Pergamon.
110. Goldberg, A. 1999. 'Making One's Way Through The Data', in M. Shibatani and S.Thompson (eds). GrammaticalConstructions: TheirForm and Meaning, 29-53. Oxford.
111. Goldman-Eisler, F. 1958. 'Speech Analysis and Mental Processes', Language and Speech, 1, 59-75.
112. Graesser, A. C. and Mandler, G. 1975. 'Recognition memory for the meaning and surface structure of sentences', Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, May, 1/3, 238-248.
113. Graf, R. and Torrey, A.W. 1966. 'Perception of phrase structure in written language', Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 83-84.
114. Granath, S. 2001. 'Is that a fact? A corpus study of the syntax and semantics of "the fact that"', in P. Rayson, A. Wilson, T. McEnery, A. Hardie and S. Khoja (eds). UCREL Technical Papers Special Issue: Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2001 Conference, 234-244.
115. Greeno, J. G. 1976. 'Psychological representation of structured knowledge', Journal ofStructural Learning, 5/1-2, 73-95.
116. Gross, M. 1979. 'On the failure of generative grammar', Language, 55/4, 859-885.
117. Halliday, M. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
118. Harris, Z. S. 1951. Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
119. P. H. Matthews. 1993. Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: CUP.
120. Heydel, M. and Murray, W. S. 1997. 'Conceptual form and the basis of sentence priming: Cross-linguistic evidence', Poster presentation to the CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. Santa Monica, CA.
121. Hick, W. E. 1952. 'On the rate of gain of information', Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
122. Hockett, C. F. 1948. 'A note on "structure"', International Journal ofAmerican Linguistics, 14,269-271.
123. P. H. Matthews. 1993. Grammatical Theory in the UnitedStates from Bloomfieldto Chomsky. Cambridge: CUP.
124. Hockett, C. F. 1952. 'A formal statement of morphemic analysis', Studies in Linguistics, 10, 210-231.
125. P. H. Matthews. 1993. Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfieldto Chomsky. Cambridge: CUP.
126. Hockett, C. F. 1953. 'Review of the Mathematical Theory of Communication by Claude L. Shannon and Warren Weaver', Language, 29/1,69-93.
127. Hockett, C. F. 1954. 'Two models of grammatical description', Word, 10,210-231.
128. P. H. Matthews. 1993. GrammaticalTheory in the UnitedStates from Bloomfieldto Chomsky. Cambridge: CUP.
129. Hockett, C. F. 1955. 'A manual of phonology', InternationalJournal of American Linguistics, 21/4, Memoirno. 11.
130. Holmes, V. M. and Forster, K. I. 1970. 'Detection of extraneous signals during sentence recognition', Perception and Psychophysics, 7/5, 297-301.
131. Hubey, H. M. 1999. Mathematical foundations of linguistics. Lincom Europa: Muenchen/NewCastle.
132. Hudson, R. 1984. Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
133. Hudson, R. 1996. The difficulty of (so-called) self-embedded structures.
134. Hudson, R. 2000. 'Language as a cognitive network', in H. G. Simonsen and R.T. Endresen (eds).A Cognitive Approach to the Verb. Morphological and Constructional Perspectives, 49-72. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.
135. Hulme, C., Maugham, S. and Brown, G. 1991. 'Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words. Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span', Journal ofMemoryand Language, 30/6, 685-701.
136. Hyde, T. S. and Jenkins, J. J. 1973. 'Recall for words as a function of semantic, graphic, and syntactic orienting tasks', Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12,471-480.
137. Hyman, R. 1953. 'Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time', Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188-196.
138. Imae, K. and Takeuchi, Y. 1959. 'Perception and recall of the series of approximation to Japanese', Japanese Journal of Psychology, 30, 168-177. Abstract in PsychINFO.
139. Iarvella, R. J. 1971. 'Syntactic processing of connected speech', Journal of Verbal Learningand Verbal Behaviour, 10/4,409-416.
140. Johnson, F. 1965. 'The psychological reality of phrase structure rules', Journal of Verbal Learningand Verbal Behaviour, 4, 469-475.
141. Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. 1992. 'A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory', Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
142. Karanth, P., Kudva, A. and Vijayan, A. 1996. 'Literacy and linguistic awareness', in B. de Gelder andJ. Morais (eds). Speech and Reading, 303-316. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
143. Keenan, J. M., MacWhinney, B. and Mayhew, D. 1977. 'Pragmatics in memory: A study of natural conversation', Journal of Verbal Learningand Verbal Behavior, 16,549-560.
144. Kessel, F. S. 1970. 'The role of syntax in children's comprehension from ages six to twelve', Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Sep., 35/6,95.
145. Kintsch, W. and Bates, E. 1977. 'Recognition memory for statements from a classroom lecture', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 150-159.
146. Kiss, G. R. 1968. 'Words, associations, and networks', Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7/4, 707-713.
147. Kramer, P. E., Koff, E. and Luria, Z. 1972. 'The development of competence in an exceptional language structure in older children and young adults', Child Development, 43, 121-130.
148. Kruijff, G. 2002. Re: Canonical Order. Corpora Mailing List http://nora.hd.uib. no/corpora/2002-4/0212. html (as on 1/4/2003).
149. Labov, W. 1979. 'Locating the frontier between social and psychological factors in linguistic variation', in C. Fillmore, D. Kempler and W. Wang (eds). Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior, 327-340. New York: Academic Press.
150. Lachman, R., Lachman,J. L. and Butterfield, E. C. 1979. Cognitive psychology and informationprocessing: An introduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
151. Lamb, S. 1966. Outline of Stratificational Grammar. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
152. Lamb, S. 1999. Pathways ofthe Brain: The Neurocognitive Basis ofLanguage. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
153. Lane, D. M. and Robertson, L. 1979. 'The generality of the levels of processing hypothesis: An application to memory for chess positions', Memory and Cognition, 7/4, 253-256.
154. Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, 1. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
155. Le-Blanc, R. S., Muise, J. G. and Gerard,J. 1971. 'Letter reading as a function of approximation to English and French', Perceptual and Motor Skills, 33/3 (Pt. 2), 1139-1142.
156. Lefton, L. A., Spragins, A. B. and Byrnes,J. 1973. 'English orthography: Relation to reading experience', Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Nov., 2/5-A, 281-282.
157. Levelt, W.J. M. 1970. 'Hierarchical chunking in sentence processing', Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 99-103.
158. Levelt, W.J. M. 1974. Formal grammars in linguistics andpsycholinguistics, VolIII: Psycholinguistic applications. Mouton: The Hague.
159. Levin, B. and Rapoport, T. 1988. 'Lexical subordination', Chicago Linguistic Society, 24/1, 275-289.
160. Goldberg, A. 1999. 'Making One's Way Through The Data', in M. Shibatani and S. Thompson (eds). Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, 29-53. Oxford.
161. Levin, H. and Kaplan, E. L. 1970. 'Grammatical structure and reading', in H. Levin andJ. P. Williams (eds). BasicStudies in Reading, 119-133. New York: BasicBooks.
162. Logan, G. D. 1988. 'Toward an instance theory of automatisation', Psychological Review, 95/4, 492-527.
163. Loosen, F. 1972. 'Cognitive organastie van zinen in het geheugen', Unpublished PhD dissertation, Louvain. Cited in W. J. M. Levelt 1974. Formalgrammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics. Vol III: Psycholinguistic applications. Mouton: The Hague.
164. W. J. M. Levelt 1974. Formalgrammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics. Vol III: Psycholinguistic applications. Mouton: The Hague.
165. Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E. and Masterson, J. 2000. 'The Word-length Effect and Disyllabic Words', The Quarterly Journal ofExperimentalPsychology, 53A/1, 1-22.
166. Lewis, R. L. 1996. 'Interference in short term memory: the magical number two (or three) in sentence processing', Journal ofPsycholinguisticResearch, 25/1, 93-115.
167. Lindenmayer, A. 1968. 'Mathematical models for cellular interaction in development', Parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 18,280-315.
168. Liversedge, S., Stewart, A. and Urbach, T. 1995. 'Syntactic priming', Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24/6, 489-506.
169. MacDonald, M. 1994. 'Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution', Languageand CognitiveProcesses, 9, 157-20l.
170. MacDonald, M. Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. 1992. 'Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity', CognitivePsychology, 24, 56-98.
171. MacDonald, M. C. and Christiansen, M. H. 2002. 'Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996)', Psychological Review, 109, 35-54.
172. Mackworth, J. 1963. 'The duration of the visual image', Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17/1, 62-81.
173. Maclay, H. and Osgood, C. E. 1959. 'Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech', Word, 15, 19-44.
174. Mandelbrot, B. 1982. The fractal geometryof nature. Freeman: San Francisco.
175. Mandler, G. and Mandler, J. M. 1964. 'Serial Position Effects in Sentences', Journal of VerbalLearningand Verbal Behaviour, 3, 195-202.
176. Maratsos, M. P. 1976. The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children. London: CUP.
177. Markov, A. A. 1913. 'Primer statisticheskogo issledovanija nad tekstom 'Evgenija Onegina' illjustrirujuschij svjaz' ispytanij v tsep (An example of statistical study on the text of 'Eugene Onegin' illustrating the linking of events to a chain)', Izvestija Imp. Akademii nauk, serija VI, 3, 153-162.
178. Marks, L. E. 1968. 'Scaling of grammaticalness of self-embedded English sentences', Journal of Verbal Learningand VerbalBehaviour, 7/5, 965-967.
179. Marks, L. E. and Miller, G. A. 1964. 'The role of semantic and syntactic constraints in the memorisation of English sentences', Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 3, 1-5.
180. Marks, M. R. and Jack, O. 1952. 'Verbal context and memory span for meaningful material', American Journal ofPsychology, 65, 298-300.
181. Masson, M. E.J. and Miller,J. A. 1983. 'Working memory and individual differences in comprehension and memory of text', Journal ofEducationalPsychology, 75,314-318.
182. Matthews, P. H. 2001. A Short History ofStructural Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.
183. McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. 1981. 'An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basic findings', Psychological Review, 88/5, 375-407.
184. McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. (eds). 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing, 2: Psychological and Biological Models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
185. McDaniel, M. A. 1981. 'Syntactic complexity and elaborative processing', Memory and Cognition, 9/5, 487-495.
186. Mehler, J., Bever, T. G. and Carey, P. 1967. 'What we look at when we read', Perception and Psychophysics, 2/5,213-218.
187. Miikkulainen, R. 1996. 'Subsymbolic case-role analysis of sentences with embedded clauses', Cognitive Science, 20, 47-73.
188. Miller, G. A. 1956. 'The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits of our capacity for processing information', Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
189. Miller, G. A. 1958. 'Free recall of redundant strings of letters', Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 485-491.
190. Miller, G. A. 1962. 'Some psychological studies of grammar', American Psychologist, 17, 748-762.
191. Miller, G. A. and Isard, S. 1963. 'Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules', Journal of Verbal Learningand Verbal Behaviour, 2, 217-228.
192. Miller, G. A. and Isard, S. 1964. 'Free recall of self-embedded English sentences', Information and Control, 7, 292-303.
193. Miller, G. A. and Selfridge,J. A. 1951. 'Verbal context and the recall of meaningful material', AmericanJournal ofPsychology, 63, 176-185.
194. Miller, G. A. Bruner, J. S. and Postman, L. 1954. 'Familiarity of letter sequences and tachiscopic identification', Journal ofGeneral Psychology, 50, 129-139.
195. Mills,J. A. and Hemsley, G. D. 1976. 'The effect of level of education on judgements of grammatical acceptability', Language and Speech, Oct.-Dec., 19/4, 324-342.
196. Mitchell, D. 1994. 'Sentence parsing', in M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.). Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 375-409, San Diego: Academic Press.
197. Mitchell, D. C., Cuetos, F., Corley, M. M. B.and Brysbaert, M. 1995. 'Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records', Journal ofPsycholinguistic Research, Nov., 24/6, 469-488.
198. Moeser, S. D. 1974. 'Memory for meaning and wording in concrete and abstract sentences', Journal of Verbal Learningand Verbal Behaviour, 13, 683-697.
199. Motter, A. E., de Moura, A. P. S., Lai, Y. C. and Dasgupta, P. T. 2002. 'Topology of the conceptual network of language', PhysicalReviewE, 65.
200. Mowbray, G. H. and Rhoades, M. V. 1959. 'On the reduction of choice reaction times with practice', Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 16-23.
201. Muise,J. G., Leblanc, R. S. and Jeffrey, C.J. 1972. 'Letter reading by English Ss as a function of order of approximation to French and English', Psychological Reports, 30/2, 395-398.
202. Muncer, S. J. and Bever, T. G. 1984. 'Sensitivity to propositional units in good reading', Journal ofPsycholinguistic Research, 13, 275-279.
203. Navon, D. 1984. 'Resources - a theoretical soup stone?', Psychological Review, Apr., 91/2, 216-234.
204. Neisser, U. 1967. Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
205. Nooteboom, S., Wijnen, F. and Weerman, F. 2002. 'Storage and computation in the language faculty', Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
206. Norman, G. R., Brooks, L. R. and Allen, S. W. 1989. 'Recall by expert medical practitioners and novices as a record of processing attention', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memoryand Cognition, 15, 1166-1174.
207. Oakhill, J. 1994. 'Individual differences in children's text comprehension', in Gernsbacher (ed.). The Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 821-848. San Diego: Academic Press.
208. Onishi, S. 1962. 'The recognition of letter sequences with different orders of approximation to the Japanese language: On the eye-voice span', Japanese Psychological Research, 4/1,43-47. Abstract in PsychINFO.
209. Perlmutter, D. M. 1971. Deepand Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax, New York: HoIt, Rinehart and Winston.
210. Perlmutter, N. J. and McDonald, M. C. 1995. 'Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution', Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 521-542.
211. Perfetti, C. 1994. 'Psycholinguistics and reading ability', in Gernsbacher (ed.). The HandbookofPsycholinguistics, 849-894. San Diego: Academic Press.
212. Peterson, L. R. and Peterson, M. J. 1959. 'Short-term retention of individual verbal items', Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 58, 193-198.
213. Pickering, M. J. and Branigan, H. P. 1998. 'The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production', Journal of Memory and Language, Nov., 39/4, 633-651.
214. Pierce, J. R. 1980. An Introduction to Information Theory: Symbols, Signals and Noise. New York: Dover Publications Inc.
215. Pollack, I. and Pickett, J. M. 1964. 'Intelligibility of excerpts from fluent speech: auditory vs. structural context', Journal of Verbal Learningand Verbal Behaviour, 3/1, 79-84.
216. Polya, G. 1954. 'Mathematics and plausible reasoning', Princeton University Press. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4 (Pt. 2), 617-618.
217. Powell, A. and Peters, R. G. 1973. 'Semantic clues in comprehension of novel sentences', Psychological Reports, 32, 1307-1310.
218. Prusinkiewicz, P. and Lindenmayer, A. 1996. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
219. Quentin, H. 1926. Essais de critique textuelle. Paris: Librarie, A. Picard.
220. Zarri, G. P. 1976. 'A computer model for textual criticism', in A. Jones and R. F. Churchhouse (eds). The Computer in Literary and Linguistics Studies, 133-155, Cardiff: The University of Wales Press.
221. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik,J. 1972. A Grammarof ContemporaryEnglish. London: Longman.
222. Rabiner, L. R. 1989. 'A tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and selected Applications in Speech Recognition', Proceedings of the IEEE, 77/2, 257-286.
223. Reber, A. S. and Anderson, J. R. 1970. 'The perception of clicks in linguistic and nonlinguistic messages', Perception and Psychophysics, 8/2, 81-89.
224. Reich, P. A. 1969. 'The finiteness of natural languages', Language, 45/4,830-843.
225. Richardson, P. and Voss, J. F. 1960. 'Replication report: Verbal context and the recall of meaningful English material', Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 417-418.
226. Roodenrys, S.,Hulme, C., Alban,J. etal. 1994. 'The effects of word frequency and age of acquisition on short-term memory span', Memory and Cognition, 22/6, 695-701.
227. Rosenberg, S. 1968. 'Association and phrase structure in sentence recall', Journal of Verbal Learningand Verbal Behaviour, 7/6, 1077-1081.
228. Ross, R. N. 1994. 'Parsing concepts: A discovery technique for poetry therapy', in A. Lerner (ed.). Poetry in the Therapeutic Experience. MMB Music, Inc, St Louis.
229. Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing, 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
230. Sachs,J. S. 1967. 'Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse', Perception and Psychophysics, 2, 437-442.
231. Sampson, G. 2000. Empirical Linguistics. London: Continuum International.
232. Sanders, L.J. 1971. 'The comprehension of certain syntactic structures by adults', Journal ofSpeech and Hearing Research, 14, 739-745.
233. Schnitzer, M. L. 1993. 'Steady as a rock: Does the Steady State Represent Cognitive Fossilisation?', Journal ofPsycholinguistic Research, 22/1, 1-19.
234. Schachter, J. 1996. 'Learning and Triggering in L2 Language Acquisition', in G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer and J. Williams (eds). Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition, 70-78. Cambridge: CUP.
235. Scheerer-Neumann, G., Ahola, H., Koenig, U. and Reckermann, U. 1978. 'The use of oral redundancy with reading disabled children', Zeitschrift fuerEntwicklungspsychologie und Paedagogische Psychologic, 10/1,35-48. Abstract in PsychINFO.
236. Schiffrin, R. M. and Schneider, W. 1977. 'Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory', Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
237. Scott, R. and Mills,J. 1973. 'Validating the Permutational Test of Grammaticality', Language and Speech, 16/2, 110-122.
238. Service, E. 1998. 'The effect of word-length on immediate recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration', Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A/2, 283-304.
239. Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W. 1949. The Mathematical Theoryof Communication. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
240. Sharman, R. A. 1989. 'An Introduction to the Theory of Language Models', IBM UKSC Report204, July 1989.
241. Sharp, H. C. 1958. 'The effect of contextual constraint upon recall of verbal passages', AmericanJournal of Psychology, 71, 568-572.
242. Simon, H. A. 1973. 'The structure of ill structured problems', Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181-201.
243. Singh, S. 2000. The Science ofSecrecy. London: Fourth Estate.
244. Spencer, N. 1973. 'Differences between linguists and non-linguists in intuitions of grammaticality-acceptability', Journal ofPsycholinguistic Research, 2, 83-98.
245. Stevenson, R. J. 1988. 'Memory for referential statements in texts', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Oct., 14/4, 612-617.
246. Stolz, W. 1967. 'A study of the ability to decode grammatically novel sentences', Journal of Verbal Learningand Verbal Behaviour, 6, 867-873.
247. St John, M. F. and McClelland, J. L. 1990. 'Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension', ArtificialIntelligence, 46/1-2, 217-258.
248. Sutton, J. P., Rittenhouse, C. D, Pace-Schott, E. and Stickgold, R. 1994. 'A new approach to dream bizarreness: Graphing continuity and discontinuity of visual attention in narrative reports', Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 3/1, 61-88.
249. Townsend, D.J. and Bever, T. G. 2001. Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
250. Townsend, D.J. and Saltz, E. 1972. 'Phrases vs. Meaning in the immediate recall of sentences', Psychonomic Science, 9, 381-384.
251. Traul, G. N. and Black,J. W. 1965. 'The effect of context on aural perception of words', Journal ofSpeech and Hearing Research, 8/4, 363-369.
252. Waugh, N. C. and Norman, D. A. 1965. 'Primary memory', Psychological Review, 72,89-104.
253. Werkerly,J. and Elman,J. 1992. 'A PDP approach to processing centre-embedded sentences', in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
254. Wickelgren, W. A. 1965. 'Short-term memory for phonemically similar lists', AmericanJournal ofPsychology, 78,567-574.
255. Wiles, J. and Elman,J. 1995. 'Learning to count without a counter: A case study of the dynamics and activation landscapes in recurrent networks'. Talk. .
256. Williams,J. 1995. 'The Psychology of Language', Unpublished Manuscript. Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, UK.
257. Wilks, C. 1999. 'Untangling Word Webs: Graph Theory Approaches to L2 lexicons', Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Swansea.
258. Wilson, R.J. and Watkins,J.J. 1990. Graphs: An Introductory Approach. New York: Wiley.
259. Wiseman, S. and Tulving, E. 1976. 'Encoding specificity: Relation between recall superiority and recognition failure', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learningand Memory, July, 2/4,349-361.
260. Wray, A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
261. Zarri, G. P. 1976. 'A Computer Model for Textual Criticism?', in A. Jones and R. F. Churchhouse (eds). The Computer in Literary and Linguistics Studies, 133-155. Cardiff: The University of Wales Press.