Researching into English for research publication purposes from an applied intercultural perspective

Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication

Volumn 22, Issue , 2010, Pages 59-73

  Moreno, Ana I ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85174527885     PISSN: 09277706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1163/9789042029569_006     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Ayers, G. (2007) The evolutionary nature of genre: An investigation of the short texts accompanying research articles in the scientific journal Nature, English for Specific Purposes (27) 1: 22.41.
2. Burgess, S. (2002) Packed houses and intimate gatherings: Audience and rhetorical structure. In Flowerdew, J. and C.N. Candlin (eds) Academic Discourse, London: Longman: 197-215.
3. Burgess, S., M.C. Fumero Pérez and A. Díaz Galán (2005) Mismatches and missed opportunities? A case study of a non-English speaking background research writer. In Carretero, M., L. Hidalgo Downing, J. Lavid, E. Martínez Caro, J. Neff, S. Pérez de Ayala and E. Sánchez-Pardo (eds) A Pleasure of Life in Words: A Festschrift for Angela Downing Madrid: Dptos. de Filología Inglesa I y II. Facultad de Filología. Universidad Complutense de Madrid: 283-304.
4. Cargill, M. and S. Burgess (2008) Introduction to special issue: English for research publication purposes, Journal of English for Academic Purposes (7) 2: 75-76.
5. Connor, U. (2004a) Introduction. Contrastive rhetoric: Recent developments and relevance for English for academic purposes, Journal of English for Academic Purposes (3) 4: 271-276.
6. Connor, U. (2004b) Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts, Journal of English for Academic Purposes (3) 4: 291-304.
7. Connor, U. (2008) Mapping multidimensional aspects of research. In Connor, U., E. Nagelhout and W. Rozycki (eds) Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric, Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 299-315.
8. Connor, U. and A.I. Moreno (2005) Tertium comparationis: A vital component in contrastive rhetoric research. In Bruthiaux, P., D. Atkinson, W.G. Egginton, W. Grabe and V. Ramanathan (eds) Directions in Applied Linguistics: Essays in Honor of Robert B. Kaplan Clevendon, England: Multilingual Matters: 153-167.
9. Curry, M.J. and T. Lillis (2004) Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands, and rewards, TESOL Quarterly (38) 4: 663-688.
10. Dafouz, E. and B. Núñez (2009) CLIL in higher education: Devising a new learning landscape. In Dafouz, E. and M.C. Guerrini (eds) CLIL across Educational Levels: Experiences from Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Contexts, London/Madrid: Richmond Publishing: 101-112.
11. Flowerdew, J. (1999) Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong, Journal of Second Language Writing (8): 243-264.
12. Flowerdew, J. (2002) Ethnographically inspired approaches to the study of academic discourse. In Flowerdew, J. (ed) Academic Discourse, Harlow, UK: Pearson Education: 235-253.
13. Flowerdew, L. (2002) Corpus-based analysis in EAP. In Flowerdew, J. (ed), Academic Discourse, Harlow, UK: Pearson Education: 95-114.
14. Fortanet Gómez, I., J.C. Palmer Silveira, J. Piqué Angordans, S. Posteguillo Gómez and J.F. Coll García (2002) Cómo Escribir un Artículo de Investigación en Inglés, Madrid: Alianza.
15. Gómez I., M.T. Fernández, M. Bordons, F. Morillo and B. González-Albo (2007) La actividad científica del CSIC a través del Web of Science, Estudio Bibliométrico del Período 2000-2006. Scientific Report, .
16. Gómez, I., R. Sancho, M. Bordons and M.T. Fernández (2006) La I+D en España a través de sus publicaciones y patentes. In Sebastián, J. and E. Muñoz (eds) Radiografía de la Investigación Pública en España, Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva: 275-302.
17. Harwood, N. and G. Hadley (2004) Demystifying institutional practices: critical pragmatism and the teaching of academic writing, English for Specific Purposes (23) 4: 355-377.
18. Hyland, K. (2000) Disciplinary Discourses, London: Longman.
19. Kaplan, R.B. (1966) Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education, Language Learning (16): 1-20.
20. Kerans, M.E. (2001) Eliciting substantive revision of manuscripts for peer review. In Muñoz, C. (ed) Trabajos en Lingüística Aplicada, Barcelona: Univerbook: 339-348.
21. Lillis, T. (2008) Ethnography as method, methodology and ‘deep theorising’: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research, Written Communication (25) 3: 353-388.
22. Lillis, T. and M.J. Curry (2006) Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English medium texts, Written Communication (23) 1: 3-35.
23. Lorés-Sanz, R. (2006) ‘I will argue that’: First person pronouns as metadiscoursal devices in RA abstracts in English and Spanish, ESP across Cultures (4) 3: 23-40.
24. Lorés-Sanz, R. (2009) Different worlds, different audiences: A contrastive analysis of research article abstracts. In Suomela-Salmi, E. and F. Dervin (eds) Cross-cultural and Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Academic Discourse (Vol. 2), Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 187-198.
25. Martín-Martín, P. (2003) A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences, English for Specific Purposes (22): 25-43.
26. McKercher, B., R. Law, K. Weber, H. Song and C. Hsu (2007) Why referees reject manuscripts?, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research (31) 4: 455-470.
27. Moreno, A.I. (1998) The explicit signalling of premise-conclusion sequences in research articles: A contrastive framework, Text (18) 4: 545-585.
28. Moreno, A.I. (2004). Retrospective labelling in premise-conclusion metatext: An English-Spanish contrastive study of research articles on business and economics, Journal of English for Academic Purposes (3) 4: 321-339.
29. Moreno, A.I. (2008) The importance of comparable corpora in cross-cultural studies. In Connor U., E. Nagelhout and W. Rozycki (eds) Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric, Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 25-41.
30. Moreno, A.I. and L. Suárez (2008a) A study of critical attitude across English and Spanish academic book reviews, Journal of English for Academic Purposes (7) 1: 15-26.
31. Moreno, A.I. and L. Suárez (2008b) A framework for comparing evaluation resources across academic texts, Text & Talk (28) 6: 749-769.
32. Moreno, A.I. and L. Suárez (2009) Academic book reviews in English and Spanish: critical comments and rhetorical structure. In Hyland, K. and G. Diani (eds) Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan: 161-178.
33. Mur-Dueñas, P. (2007) A Contribution to the Intercultural Analysis of Metadiscourse in Business Management Research Articles in English and in Spanish: A Corpus-driven Approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.
34. Mur-Dueñas, P. (2008) Analysing engagement markers cross-culturally: The case of English and Spanish business management research articles. In Burgess, S. and P. Martín Martín (eds) English as an Additional Language in Research Publication and Communication, Bern: Peter Lang: 197-213.
35. Mur-Dueñas, P. (2009) Citation in business management research articles: A contrastive (English-Spanish) corpus-based analysis. In Suomela-Salmi, E. and F. Dervin (ed) Cross-cultural and Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Academic Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 49-60.
36. Mur-Dueñas, P. and R. Lorés-Sanz (2009) Responding to Spanish academics’ needs to write in English: From research to the implementation of academic writing workshops. Paper presented at the 27th AESLA International Conference. Ways and Modes of Human Communication, Ciudad Real, 26-28 March.
37. Pérez Ruiz, L. (1999) Análisis contrastivo de los resúmenes en inglés y español en artículos publicados en el campo de la epidemiología, ES: Revista de Filología Inglesa (22): 167-176.
38. Rey-Rocha, J., M.J. Martín-Sempere, L.M. Plaza, J.J. Ibáñez and I. Méndez (1998) Changes on publishing behaviour in response to research policy guidelines: The case of the Spanish Research Council in the field of Agronomy, Scientometrics (41) 1: 101-111.
39. Salager-Meyer, F. (2006) From “Mr. Guthrie is profoundly mistaken...” to “Our data do not seem to confirm the results of a previous study on...”: A diachronic study of polemicity in academic writing (1810-1995), Ibérica (1): 5-28.
40. Salager-Meyer, F., M.A. Alcaraz Ariza and N. Zambrano (2003) The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: Intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930-1995), English for Specific Purposes (22) 3: 223-247.
41. Sarangi, S. (1995) Culture. In Verschueren, J., J. Östman and J. Blommaert (eds) Handbook of Pragmatics, Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 1-30.
42. Swales, J.M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Swales, J.M. (2002) Integrated and fragmented worlds: EAP materials and corpus linguistics. In Flowerdew, J. (ed) Academic Discourse, Harlow, UK: Pearson Education: 151-164.
44. Swales, J.M. (2004) Research Genres: Explorations and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Valero-Garcés, C. (1996) Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English economics texts, English for Specific Purposes (15) 4: 279-294.