Why Referees Reject Manuscripts

Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 455-470

  McKercher, Bob ^a   Law, Rob ^a   Weber, Karin ^a   Song, Haiyan ^a   Hsu, Cathy ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

referee; rejection

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549110906     PISSN: 10963480     EISSN: 15577554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1096348007302355     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Reasons for journal rejection: An analysis of 600 manuscripts.Political Science. 1978;11 (4): 480-483.
2. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports.Academic Medicine. 2001;76 (9): 889-896.
3. Ethics and the accounting publishing process: Author, reviewer, and editor issues.Journal of Business Ethics. 1998;17 (16): 1785-1803.
4. Publication rejection among ecologists. Trends.Ecology and Evolution. 2003;18 (8): 375-376.
5. Manuscript characteristics affecting reviewers' decisions for rehabilitation counseling related journals.Journal of Rehabilitation. 2000 2001;:.
6. Factors leading to the rejection of accountants' manuscripts.Journal of Accounting Education. 1990;8 (1): 93-104.
7. The residents' perspective in tourism research.Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing. 2004;17 (4): 45-62.
8. Publishing across borders: Furthering the internationalisation of AMJ.Academy of Management Journal. 2003 2006;46 (6): 679-683.
9. Reviewing the gatekeepers: A survey of referees of library journals.Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1988;39 (6): 400-407.
10. Authors and editors of library science journals: Reflections from an Asia/Pacific context.Libri. 2000;50 (2): 98-103.
11. Scholarly consensus and journal rejection rates.American Sociological Review. 1988;53 (1): 139-151.
12. Why manuscripts get rejected and what can be done about it?.Journal of Literacy Research. 1998;30 (1): 1-7.
13. Something rotten at the core of science?.Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2001;22 (2): 51-52.
14. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. Journal of the.American Medical Association. 2002;287 (21): 2786-2790.
15. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research: Aims & scope. 2006 2006;:.
16. Peer review: Crude and understudied, but indispensable. Journal of the.American Medical Association. 1994;272 (2): 96-97.
17. Nursing publications outside the United States.Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2000;32 (1): 87-92.
18. The privileges and responsibilities of being a referee.Annals of Tourism Research. 2002;29 (3): 856-859.
19. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003:.
20. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication.Respiratory Care. 2004;49 (10): 1246-1252.
21. A comprehensive analysis of the publication process in selected health-related journals [Electronic version]. American Journal of Health.Studies. 1998;14 (3): 143-147.
22. A critical review of peer review: The need to scrutinize "gatekeepers" of research in exercise physiology.Journal of Exercise Physiology. 2003 2006;6 (2): i-xiii.
23. Blowing the whistle on tourism referees.Tourism Management. 1996;17 (6): 397-399.
24. Normative standards in IS research.Database. 1994 2006;25 (1): 21-34.
25. Guidelines for conducting research and publishing in marketing: From conceptualization through the review process.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2001 2006;29 (4): 405-415.
26. Writing publishable papers.Tourism Management. 2003;24 (4): 437-446.