Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 38, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 860-877

  Fusco, Dana ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035475314     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.1036     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Atwater, M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 821-838.
3. Barton, A.C. (1998a). Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Barton, A.C. (1998b). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 379-394.
5. Barton, A.C., & Darkside (2000). Autobiography in science education: Greater objectivity through local knowledge. Research in Science Education, 30, 23-42.
6. Bogdan, R.C., & Biklin, S.K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Conrad, D., & Hedin, D. (1982). The impact of experiential education on adolescent development. Child & Youth Services, 4, 57-76.
8. Crane, V. (1994). An introduction to informal science learning and research. In V. Crane, H. Nicholson, S. Bitgood, & M. Chen (Eds.), Informal science learning. Dedham, MA: Research Communications, Ltd.
9. Eccles, J.S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Iver, D.M. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90-101.
10. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S.F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261-295.
11. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
12. Feenstra, G., McGrew, S., & Campbell, D. (1999). Entrepreneurial community gardens: Growing food, skills, jobs and communities. Research report. Oakland, CA: University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
13. Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. New York: State University of New York Press.
14. Fusco, D. (1999). Assessing science in and out of school. Technical Report to the National Science Foundation (EHR, 9733700). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
15. Fusco, D. (in press). Rethinking science and assessment. In A.C. Barton & M.D. Osbourne (Eds.), Teaching science in diverse settings: Marginalized discourses and classroom practice (pp. 201-228). New York: Peter Lang.
16. Fusco, D., & Barton, A. (2001). Representing student achievements in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 337-354.
17. Gitomer, D.H., & Duschl, R.A. (1995). Moving toward a portfolio culture in science education. Technical Report. Center for Performance Assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
18. Hobson, D. (2001). Action and reflection: Narrative and journaling in teacher research. In G. Burnaford, J. Fischer, & D. Hobson (Eds.), Teachers doing research: The power of action through inquiry, 2nd ed. (pp. 7-28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Hoftstein, A., Bybee, R., & Legro, P. (1997). Linking formal and informal science education through science education standards. Science Education International, 8, 31-37.
20. Holzman, L. (1997). Schools for growth: Radical alternatives to current educational models. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.) (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.
22. Kiefer, J. & Kemple, M. (1998). Digging deeper: Integrating youth gardens into schools & communities. A comprehensive guide produced by Food Works in partnership with the American Community Gardening Association. Vermont: Common Roots Press.
23. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lawson, L., & McNally, M. (1995). Putting teens at the center: Maximizing public utility of urban space through youth involvement in planning and employment. Children's Environments, 12, 209-221.
25. Lee, O., & Fradd, S.H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English-language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27, 12-21.
26. Lemke, J.L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296-316.
27. McShane, J.B., & Yager, R.E. (1996). Advantages of STS for minority students. In R.E. Yager (Ed.), Science/technology/society as reform in science education (pp. 131-138). New York: State University of New York Press.
28. National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. National Science Foundation (1998). A report on the evaluation of the National Science Foundation's informal science education program (NSF 98-65). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
30. Newman, D. (1990). Using social context for science teaching. In M. Gardner, J.G. Greeno, F. Reif, A. Schoenfeld, A. Disessa, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 187-217). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Newman, F., & Holzman, L. (1996). Unscientific psychology: A cultural-performatory approach to understanding human life. Westport, CT: Praeger.
32. New Standards (1997). Performance standards: Middle school (Vol. 2). Pittsburgh, PA: National Center on Education and the Economy, University of Pittsburgh.
33. Nieto, S. (1994). Lessons from students on creating a chance to dream. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 392-426.
34. Noffke, S.E. (1997). Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. Review of research in education, 22, 305-343.
35. Rahm, J. (1999, April). Is that really science? A look at the science practice of an inner-city youth gardening program? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Quebec.
36. Reason, P. (1988). Human inquiry in action Developments in new paradigm research. London: Sage.
37. Resnick, L. (1987). Learning in and out of school. Educational Researcher, 16, 13-20.
38. Rodriguez, A.J. (1998). Strategies for counterresistance: Toward sociotransformative constructivism and learning to teach science for diversity and for understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 589-622.
39. Rogoff, B., & Chavajay, P. (1995). What's become of research on the cultural basis of cognitive development? American Psychologist, 50, 859-877.
40. Roth, W.M. (1998). Designing Communities. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
41. Saxe, G.B. (1990). The interplay between children's learning in school and out-of-school contexts. In M. Gardner, J.G. Greeno, F. Reif, A. Schoenfeld, A. Disessa, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 219-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the "standard" direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38.
43. Sleeter, C.E., & Grant, C.A. (1991). Mapping terrains of power: Student cultural knowledge vs. classroom knowledge. In C.E. Sleeter (Ed.), Empowerment through multicultural education (pp. 49-67). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
44. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Vygotsky, L.S. (1982). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology. In A.R. Luna & M.G. Iaroshevski (Eds.), L.S. Vygotsky Collected Works (Vol. I). Moscow: Pedagogika.