Representing student achievements in science

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 337-354

  Fusco, Dana ^a   Barton, Angela Calabrese ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042916051     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<337::AID-TEA1009>3.0.CO;2-0     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Atwater, M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 821-838.
3. Barton, A.C. (1998). Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Barton, A.C., & Osborne, M. (2000). Building inclusive science through oral histories. Women's Studies Quarterly, 28, 271-295.
5. Brickhouse, N. (1994). Bringing in the outsiders: Reshaping the sciences of the future. Curriculum Studies, 26, 401-416.
6. Cohen, C. (1996). New ways of making babies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
7. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S.F. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261-295.
8. Epstein, S. (1997). Impure science. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
9. Fusco, D. (1999). Assessing science in and out of school. Technical Report to the National Science Foundation (EHR, 9733700). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
10. Fusco, D. (2000, April). Building an inclusive and relevant science through community gardening. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
11. Gill, D., & Levidow, L. (1989). Science curriculum innovation and Holland Park School. In D. Gill & L. Levidow (Eds.), Anti-racist science teaching (pp. 147-174). London: Free Association.
12. Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. In A. Iran-Nejad & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (vol. 24, pp. 355-392). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
13. Gitomer, D.H., & Duschl, R.A. (1995). Moving toward a portfolio culture in science education. Technical report. Center for Performance Assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
14. Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
15. Holzman, L. (1997). Schools for growth: Radical alternatives to current educational models. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Keller, E. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. Kulm, G., & Stuessy, C. (1991). Assessment in science and mathematics education reform. In G. Kulm & S.M. Malcom (Eds.), Science assessment in the service of reform (pp. 71-88). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
18. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lee, O., & Fradd, S.H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English-language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27, 12-21.
20. McGinn, M.K., & Roth, W.M. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, 28, 14-24.
21. McShane, J.B., & Yager, R.E. (1996). Advantages of STS for minority students. In R.E. Yager (Ed.), Science/technology/society as reform in science education (pp. 131-138). New York: State University of New York Press.
22. New Standards. (1997). Performance standards: Middle school (vol. 2). National Center on Education and the Economy, University of Pittsburgh.
23. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24. Rahm, J. (1999, April). Is that really science? A look at the science practice of an inner-city youth gardening program? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
25. Rodriguez, A.J. (1998). Strategies for counterresistance: Toward sociotransformative constructivism and learning to teach science for diversity and for understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 589-622.
26. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Rogoff, B., & Chavajay, P. (1995). What's become of research on the cultural basis of cognitive development? American Psychologist, 50, 859-877.
28. Roth, W.M. (1998). Designing communities. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
29. Roth, W.M., & McGinn, M.K. (1998). UnDELETE science education: Lives/work/voices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 399-421.
30. Roychoudhury, A., Tippins, D., & Nichols, S. (1995). Gender-inclusive science teaching: A feminist perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 897-930.
31. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4-13.
32. The Urban Atmosphere. [Film]. Available from the Urban Science Education with Integrated Technologies Project, The University of Texas at Austin, 340 Sanchez Building, Austin, TX, 78712.
33. Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J. III, & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 31-74.
34. Young, R. (1989). Racist society, racist science. In D. Gill and L. Levidow (Eds.), Antiracist science teaching (pp. 16-42). London: Free Association.