How Persons and Situations Regulate Message Framing Effects: The Study of Health Behavior

Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 475-486

  Rothman, Alexander J ^a   Wlaschin, Jhon T ^a   Bartels, Roger D ^a   Latimer, Amy ^b   Salovey, Peter ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145862962     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203888148-61     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Apanovitch, A. M., McCarthy, D., & Salovey, P. (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22, 60-67.
2. Armitage, C. J. (2004). Evidence that implementation intentions reduce dietary fat intake: A randomized trial. Health Psychology, 23, 319-323.
3. Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beauvais, J., et al. (1995). The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14, 178-184.
4. Bartels, R., Kelly, K. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2006). Specifying the impact of behavior: An analysis of how and when message frames impact behavioral decision-making. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
5. Brug, J., Steenhuis, I., van Assema, P., & de Vries, H. (1996). The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Preventative Medicine, 25, 236-242.
6. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1984). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 673-675.
7. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333.
8. Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388-404.
9. Cox, D., & Cox, A. D. (2001). Communicating the consequences of early detection: The role of evidence and framing. Journal of Marketing, 65, 91-103.
10. Croyle, R. T., & Ditto, P. H. (1990). Illness cognition and behavior:An experimental approach. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 31-52.
11. Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sun screen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18, 189-196.
12. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
13. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804-818.
14. Finney, L., & Iannoti, R. (2002). Message framing and mammography screening: A theory-driven intervention. Behavioral Medicine, 28, 5-14.
15. Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631-636.
16. Fugelstad, P., Rothman, A. J., & Jeffery, R. W. (in press). Getting there and hanging on: The effect of regulatory focus on performance in smoking and weight loss interventions. Health Psychology.
17. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119.
18. Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). New York: Academic Press.
19. Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and prevention as a motivational duality: Implications for evaluative processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
20. Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.
21. Higgins, E. T., Idson, L. C., Freitas, A. L., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1140-1153.
22. Jones, L., Sinclair, R., & Courneya, K. (2003). The effects of source credibility and message framing on exercise intentions, behaviors, and attitudes: An integration of the elaboration likelihood model and prospect theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 179-196.
23. Kiene, S. M., Barta, W. D., Zelenski, J. M., & Cothran, D. L. (2005). Why are you bringing up condoms now? The effect of message content on framing effects of condom use messages, Health Psychology, 24, 321-326.
24. Kreuter, M. K., Bull, F. C., Clark, E. M., & Oswald, D. L. (1999). Understanding how people process health information:A comparison of tailored and non-tailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychology, 18, 487-494.
25. Kreuter, M. W., & Skinner, C. S. (2000). Tailoring: What’s in a name? Health Education Research, 15, 1-4.
26. Kreuter, M. W., Strecher, V. J., & Glassman, B. (1999). One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 276-283.
27. Kreuter, M. W., & Wray, R. J. (2003). Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, S227-S232.
28. Latimer, A. E., Rivers, S. E., Rench, T. A., Katulak, N. A., Mowad, L. Z., Higgins, E. T., et al. (2007). A field experiment testing the utility of regulatory fit messages for encouraging participation in physical activity. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
29. Latimer, A. E., Katulak, N., Mowad, L., & Salovey, P. (2005). Motivating cancer prevention and early detection behaviors using psychologically tailored messages. Journal of Health Communication, s137-s156.
30. Lalor, K. M., & Hailey, B. J. (1990). The effects of message framing and feelings of susceptibility to breast cancer on reported frequency of breast self-examination. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 10, 183-192.
31. Lauver, D., & Rubin, M. (1990). Message framing, dispositional optimism, and follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou tests. Research in Nursing and Health, 13, 199-207.
32. Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus:The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 205-218.
33. Lerman, C., Ross, E., Boyce, A., Gorchov, P. M., McLauglin, R., Rimer, B., et al. (1992). The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 729-730.
34. Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Fischhoff, B. (1993). AIDS risk perceptions and decision biases. In J. B. Pryor & G. D. Reeder (Eds.), The social psychology of HIV infection (pp. 5-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Mann, T., Sherman, D., & Updegraff, J. (2004). Dispositional motivations and message framing: A test of the congruency hypothesis in college students. Health Psychology, 23, 330-334.
36. Marshall, A. L., Bauman, A. E., Owen, N., Booth, M. L., Crawford, D., & Marcus, B. H. (2003). Population-based randomized controlled trial of a stage-targeted physical activity intervention. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 194-202.
37. McCaul, K. D., Johnson, R. J., & Rothman, A. J. (2002). The effects of framing and action instructions on whether older adults obtain flu shots. Health Psychology, 21, 624-628.
38. Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500-510.
39. Meyerowitz, B. E., Wilson, D. K., & Chaiken, S. (1991, June). Loss-framed messages increase breast self-examination for women who perceive risk. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
40. Millar, M., & Millar, K. (2000). Promoting safe driving behaviors:The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 853-856.
41. Myers, R. E., Ross, E. A., Wolf, T. A., Balshem, A., Jepson, C., & Millner, L. (1991). Behavioral interventions to increase adherence to colorectal cancer screening. Medical Care, 29, 1039-1050.
42. O’Connor, D. B., Ferguson, E., & O’Connor, R. C. (2005). Intentions to use hormonal male contraception: The role of message framing, attitudes and stress appeals. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 351-369.
43. Orbell, S., Perugini, M., & Rakow, T. (2004). Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: Consideration of future consequences. Health Psychology, 23, 388-396.
44. Pennington, G. I., & Roese, N. J. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 563-576.
45. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 323-390). New York: McGraw Hill.
46. Rivers, S. E., Pizarro, D. A., Schneider, T. R., Pizarro, J., & Salovey, P. (2005). Message framing and Pap test utilization among women attending a community health clinic. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 67-79.
47. Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56, S202-S221.
48. Rothman, A. J., Kelly, K. M., Hertel, A., & Salovey, P. (2003). Message frames and illness representations: Implications for interventions to promote and sustain healthy behavior. In L. D. Cameron & H. Leventhal (Eds.), The selfregulation of health and illness behavior (pp. 278-296). London, UK: Routledge.
49. Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Salovey, P. (1999). The systematic influence of gain-and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1355-1369.
50. Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3-19.
51. Rothman, A. J., & Salovey P. (2007). The reciprocal relation between principles and practice: Social psychology and health behavior. In A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd edn.) (pp. 826-849). New York: Guilford Press.
52. Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 408-433.
53. Rothman, A. J., Stark, E., & Salovey, P. (2006). Using message framing to promote healthy behavior: A guide to best practices. In J. Trafton (Ed.), Best practices in the behavioral management of chronic diseases, (Vol. 3, pp. 31-48). Institute for Disease Management: Los Altos, CA.
54. Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Apanovitch, A. M., Pizarro, J., McCarthy, D., Zullo, J., et al. (2001). The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychology, 20, 256-266.
55. Semin, G. R., Higgins, E. T., de Montes, L. G., Estourget, Y., & Valencia, J. F. (2005). Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: How abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 36-45.
56. Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285-293.
57. Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Implementation intentions and repeated behavior: Augmenting the predictive validity of the theory of planned behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 349-369.
58. Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychology, 19, 283-289.
59. Sherman, D. K., Mann, T. L., & Updegraff, J. A. (in press). Approach/avoidance orientation, message framing, and health behavior: Understanding the congruency effect. Motivation and Emotion.
60. Skinner, C. S., Strecher, V. J., & Hospers, H. (1994). Physicians’ recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference? American Journal of Public Health, 84, 43-49.
61. Spiegel, S., Grant-Pillow, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 39-54.
62. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 221, 453-458.
63. Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3-15.
64. Weinstein, N. D. (1993). Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychology, 12, 324-333.
65. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329-349.
66. Wlaschin, J. T., Bartels, R. D., & Rothman, A. J. (2007, January). Regulatory focus and health behavior: Testing how behaviors can evoke a prevention or promotion mindset. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Memphis, TN.
67. Wlaschin, J. T., Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., & Bachnick, L. (2006, May). Behaviors with personality: Testing the mindset evoked by prevention and detection behaviors. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, New York.