Intentions to use hormonal male contraception: The role of message framing, attitudes and stress appraisals

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 351-369

  O'Connor, Daryl B ^a   Ferguson, Eamonn ^b   O'Connor, Rory C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HORMONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CONTRACEPTION; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; HORMONES; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 23844546898     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712605X49114     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3. Anderson, R. A., & Baird, D. T. (2002). Male contraception. Endocrine Reviews, 23, 735-762.
4. Apanovitch, A. M., McCarthy, D., & Salovey, P. (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22, 60-67.
5. Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beuvais, J., & Epel, E. (1995). The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14, 178-184.
6. Baron, R. A., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
7. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Erlbaum.
8. Conner, M., & Norman, P. (1996). Predicting health behaviour. Philadelphia: OUP Press.
9. Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, P., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: gain framed messages motivate beach goers. Health Psychology, 18, 189-196.
10. Emmett, C., & Ferguson, E. (1999). Oral contraceptive pill use, decisional balance, risk perception and knowledge: An exploratory study. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 17, 327-343.
11. Farrell, K., Ferguson, E., James, V, & Lowe, K. (2001). Confidence in the safety of blood for transfusion: The effect of message framing. Transfusion, 41, 1335-1340.
12. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behaviour relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505-514.
14. Ferguson, E., & Bibby, P. A. (2002). Predicting future blood donor returns: Past behavior, intentions and observer effects. Health Psychology, 21, 513-518.
15. Ferguson, E., Bibby, P. A., & Leaviss, J. (2003). Effective design of workplace risk communications. Sudbury, UK: HSE Books, (also available as a PDF at http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrhtm/rr093.htm).
16. Ferguson, E., Lawrence, C., & Matthews, G. (2000). Associations between primary appraisals, life events while controlling for depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 143-155.
17. Ferguson, E., Matthews, G., & Cox, T. (1999). The appraisal of life events (ALE) scale: Reliability and validity. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 97-116.
18. Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 55, 647-654.
19. Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., & Allum, N. C. (1999). Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the US. Science, 285, 384-387.
20. Glasier, A. F., Anakwe, R., Everington, D., Martin, C. M., van der Spuy, Z., Cheng, L., Ho, P. C., & Anderson, R. A. (2000). Would women trust their partners to use a male pill. Human Reproduction, 15, 646-649.
21. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
22. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 160-173.
23. Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Kuhberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23-55.
25. Kuhberger, A., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., & Ferner, J. (1999). The effects of framing, reflection, probability and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 204-231.
26. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
27. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A Typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149-188.
28. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286.
29. Martin, C. W, Anderson, R. A., Cheng, L., Ho, P. C., van der Spuy, Z., Smith, K. B., Glasier, A. F., Everington, D., & Baird, D. T. (2000). Potential impact of hormonal male contraception: Cross-cultural implications for development of novel preparations. Human Reproduction, 15, 637-645.
30. Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500-510.
31. Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (2004). Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 159-167.
32. O'Carroll, R. E., Whiten, S., Jackson, D., & Sinclair, D. W (2002). Assessing the emotional impact of cadaver dissection on medical students. Medical Education, 36, 550-554.
33. O'Connor, D. B., Archer, J., Hair, W. M., & Wu, F. C. W. (2001). Activational effects of testosterone on cognitive function in men. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1385-1394.
34. O'Connor, D. B., Archer, J., Hair, W. M., & Wu, F. C. W. (2002). Exogenous testosterone, aggression and mood in eugonadal and hypogonadal men. Physiology and Behavior, 75, 557-566.
35. O'Connor, D. B., Archer, J., & Wu, F. C. W. (2004). Effects of testosterone on mood, aggression and sexual behavior in young men: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 89, 2837-2845.
36. Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Rothman, A. J., Kelly, K. M., Hertel, A. W, & Salovey, P. (2003). Message frames and illness representations. Implications for interventions to promote and sustain healthy behaviors. In L. D. Cameron & H. Leventhal (Eds.), The self-regulation of health and illness behavior New York: Routledge, (pp. 279-297).
38. Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3-19.
39. Rothman, A. J., Salovev, P., Antone, C., Keoueh, K., & Martin, C. D. (1993) The influence of