Affect and Usage Choices in Simulation Problem-Solving Environments

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 158, Issue , 2007, Pages 145-152

  Rodrigo, Ma Mercedes T ^a   Baker, Ryan S J D ^b   Lagud, Maria C V ^a   Lim, Sheryl A L ^a   Macapanpan, Alexis F ^a   Pascua, Sheila A M S ^a   Santillano, Jerry Q ^a   Sevilla, Leima R S ^a   Sugay, Jessica O ^a   Tep, Sinath ^a   Viehland, Norma J B ^a  

^a ATENEO DE MANILA UNIVERSITY   (Philippines)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROBLEM SOLVING;

AFFECTIVE STATE; FIELD OBSERVATIONS; PROBLEM-SOLVING ENVIRONMENT;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85140070568     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. (2005) Inferring learning and attitudes from a Bayesian Network of log file data. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education, 33-40.
2. Baker, R.S.J.D. (in press) Modeling and Understanding Students’ Off-Task Behavior in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. To appear in Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI: Computer-Human Interaction 2007.
3. Baker, R.S.J.D., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Evenson, E., Roll, I., Wagner, A.Z., Naim, M., Raspat, J., Baker, D.J., Beck, J. (2006) Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 392-401.
4. Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., and Wagner, A.Z. (2004) Off-Task Behavior in the Cognitive Tutor Classroom: When Students “Game the System”. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer-Human Interaction, 383-390.
5. Baker, R.S., Roll, I., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R. (2005) Do Performance Goals Lead Students to Game the System? Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (AIED2005), 57-64.
6. st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
7. Cohen, J. (1960) A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
8. th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 55-66.
9. Craig, S.D., Graesser, A.C., Sullins, J., Gholson, B. (2004) Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media, 29 (3), 241-250.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
11. D'Mello, S. K., Craig, S. D., Witherspoon, A., McDaniel, B., Graesser, A. (2005). Integrating affect sensors in an intelligent tutoring system. In “Affective Interactions: The Computer in the Affective Loop Workshop” In conjunction with International conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 7-13.
12. de Vicente, A., Pain, H. (2002) Informing the detection of the students’ motivational state: an empirical study. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 933-943.
13. Lee, S.W., Kelly, K.E., Nyre, J.E. Preliminary Report on the Relation of Students’ On-Task Behavior With Completion of School Work. Psychological Reports, 84 (1999), 267-272.
14. Lloyd, J.W., Loper, A.B. Measurement and Evaluation of Task-Related Learning Behavior: Attention to Task and Metacognition. School Psychology Review, 15 (3) (1986), 336-345.
15. Sierra Online, Inc. (2001) The Incredible Machine: Even More Contraptions.
16. th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 382-391.
17. Ziemek, T. (2006) Two-D or not Two-D: gender implications of visual cognition in electronic games. Proceedings of the 2006 Symposium on Interactive 3D graphics and games,183-190.