What Can Educational Psychology Learn From, and Contribute to, Theory Development Scholarship?

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2022, Pages 3011-3035

  Greene, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Open science; Research methods; Theory; Theory development

Indexed keywords

EID: 85130346497     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-022-09682-5     Document Type: Review

References (117)

1. American Psychological Association. (2022). Impact APA. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/about/apa/strategic-plan. Accessed 24 Jan 2022.
2. American Psychological Association. (2021). Apology to people of color for APA’s role in promoting, perpetuating, and failing to challenge racism, racial discrimination, and human hierarchy in US: [Resolution adopted by the APA Council of Representatives]. Apology to people of color for APA’s role in promoting, perpetuating, and failing to challenge racism, racial discrimination, and human hierarchy in US https://www.apa.org/about/policy/racism-apology. Accessed 24 Jan 2022.
3. Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, National Institute of Education, & Center for the Study of Reading.
4. Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., Greene, J. A. (2012). Projecting educational psychology’s future from its past and present: A trend analysis. In APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues. (pp. 3–32). American Psychological Association.
5. Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A Topographical Perspective Considered. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 176–192. 10.1080/00461520903029006 DOI: 10.1080/00461520903029006
6. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
7. Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2018). On the goals of epistemic education: Promoting apt epistemic performance. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(3), 353–389. 10.1080/10508406.2017.1392968 DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2017.1392968
8. Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2020). A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 107–119. 10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2020.1786388
9. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
10. Berkman, E. T., & Wilson, S. M. (2021). So useful as a good theory? The practicality crisis in (social) psychological theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 864–874. 10.1177/1745691620969650 DOI: 10.1177/1745691620969650
11. Bernacki, M. L., Vosicka, L., & Utz, J. C. (2020). Can a brief, digital skill training intervention help undergraduates “learn to learn” and improve their STEM achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 765. 10.1037/edu0000405 DOI: 10.1037/edu0000405
12. Bogart, K. R., & Dunn, D. S. (2019). Ableism special issue introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 75(3), 650–664. 10.1111/josi.12354 DOI: 10.1111/josi.12354
13. Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3–15. 10.3102/0013189X034006003 DOI: 10.3102/0013189X034006003
14. Borsboom, D., van der Mass, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R. A., & Haig, B. (2021). Theory construction methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 755–766. 10.1177/1745691620969647 DOI: 10.1177/1745691620969647
15. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
16. Brown, M., Duff, H., Karatzias, T., & Horsburgh, D. (2011). A review of the literature relating to psychological interventions and people with intellectual disabilities: Issues for research, policy, education and clinical practice. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 15(1), 31–45. 10.1177/1744629511401166 DOI: 10.1177/1744629511401166
17. Buchanan, N. T., Perez, M., Prinstein, M. J., & Thurston, I. B. (2021). Upending racism in psychological science: Strategies to change how science is conducted, reported, reviewed, and disseminated. American Psychologist, 76(7), 1097. 10.1037/amp0000905 DOI: 10.1037/amp0000905
18. Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2021). KReC-MD: Knowledge revision with multiple documents. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1475–1497. 10.1007/s10648-021-09603-y DOI: 10.1007/s10648-021-09603-y
19. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.
20. Chemers, M. M., Hu, L. T., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 55. 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55 DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55
21. Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Duncan, R. G. (2020). Disagreeing about how to know: The instructional value of explorations into knowing. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 167–180. 10.1080/00461520.2020.1786387 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2020.1786387
22. Cizek, G. J. (2016). Validating test score meaning and defending test score use: Different aims, different methods. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 212–225. 10.1080/0969594X.2015.1063479 DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2015.1063479
23. Cizek, G. J. (2020). Validity: An integrated approach to test score meaning and use. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429291661 DOI: 10.4324/9780429291661
24. DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., & Schutz, P. A. (2014). Researching race within educational psychology contexts. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 244–260. 10.1080/00461520.2014.957828 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2014.957828
25. Dunning, D. (2011). The Dunning–Kruger effect: On being ignorant of one's own ignorance. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 247–296). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00005-6
26. Emery, A., & Anderman, L. H. (2020). Using interpretive phenomenological analysis to advance theory and research in educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 220–231. 10.1080/00461520.2020.1787170 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2020.1787170
27. Eronen, M. I., & Bringmann, L. F. (2021). The theory crisis in psychology: How to move forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 779–788. 10.1177/1745691620970586 DOI: 10.1177/1745691620970586
28. Eronen, M. I., & Romeijn, J.-W. (2020). Philosophy of science and the formalization of psychological theory. Theory & Psychology, 30(6), 786–799. 10.1177/0959354320969876 DOI: 10.1177/0959354320969876
29. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2018). Dual process theory: Perspectives and problems. In W. De Neys (Ed.), Current issues in thinking and reasoning. Dual process theory 2.0 (p. 137–155). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204550-9
30. Fidler, F., Thorn, F. S., Barnett, A., Kambouris, S., & Kruger, A. (2018). The epistemic importance of establishing the absence of an effect. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 237–244. 10.1177/2515245918770407 DOI: 10.1177/2515245918770407
31. Fiedler, K. (2017). What constitutes strong psychological science? The (neglected) role of diagnosticity and a priori theorizing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(1), 46–61. 10.1177/1745691616654458 DOI: 10.1177/1745691616654458
32. Flake, J. K. (2021). Strengthening the foundation of educational psychology by integrating construct validation into open science reform. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 132–141. 10.1080/00461520.2021.1898962 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1898962
33. Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. 10.1177/2515245920952393 DOI: 10.1177/2515245920952393
34. Fleming, J. I., Wilson, S. E., Hart, S. A., Therrien, W. J., & Cook, B. G. (2021). Open accessibility in education research: Enhancing the credibility, equity, impact, and efficiency of research. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 110–121. 10.1080/00461520.2021.1897593 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1897593
35. Fong, C. J., Alejandro, A. J., Krou, M. R., Segovia, J., & Johnston-Ashton, K. (2019). Ya’at’eeh: Race-reimaged belongingness factors, academic outcomes, and goal pursuits among Indigenous community college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101805. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101805 DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101805
36. Frankel, K. K., Becker, B. L., Rowe, M. W., & Pearson, P. D. (2016). From “what is reading?” to what is literacy? Journal of Education, 196(3), 7–17. 10.1177/002205741619600303 DOI: 10.1177/002205741619600303
37. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power & the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
38. Gehlbach, H., & Robinson, C. D. (2021). From old school to open science: The implications of new research norms for educational psychology and beyond. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 79–89. 10.1080/00461520.2021.1898961 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1898961
39. Gervais, W. M. (2021). Practical methodological reform needs good theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 827–843. 10.1177/1745691620977471 DOI: 10.1177/1745691620977471
40. Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Personal reflections on theory and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 733–743. 10.1177/0959354310378184 DOI: 10.1177/0959354310378184
41. Giner-Sorolla, R. (2019). From crisis of evidence to a “crisis” of relevance? Incentive-based answers for social psychology’s perennial relevance worries. European Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 1–38. 10.1080/10463283.2018.1542902 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1542902
42. Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43. 10.1177/0272431693013001002 DOI: 10.1177/0272431693013001002
43. Graesser, A. C. (2009). Cognitive scientists prefer theories and testable principles with teeth. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 193–197. 10.1080/00461520903029022 DOI: 10.1080/00461520903029022
44. Graham, S. (2022). A walk through the landscape of writing: Insights from a program of writing research. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 55–72. 10.1080/00461520.2021.1951734 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1951734
45. Grahek, et al. (2021). Anatomy of a psychological theory: Integrating construct-validation and computational-modeling methods to advance theorizing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 803–815. 10.1177/1745691620966794 DOI: 10.1177/1745691620966794
46. Gray, D. L., Hope, E. C., & Matthews, J. S. (2018). Black and belonging at school: A case for interpersonal, instructional, and institutional opportunity structures. Educational Psychologist, 53(2), 97–113. 10.1080/00461520.2017.1421466 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2017.1421466
47. Gray, K. (2017). How to map theory: Reliable methods are fruitless without rigorous theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 731–741. 10.1177/1745691617691949 DOI: 10.1177/1745691617691949
48. Greene, J. A., Duke, R. F., Freed, R., Dragnić-Cindrić, D., & Cartiff, B. M. (2022). Effects of an ego-depletion intervention upon online learning. Computers & Education, 177, 104362. 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104362 DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104362
49. Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (2016). Introduction to epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.). Handbook of Epistemic Cognition (pp. 495–510). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795225
50. Greene, J. A., & Yu, S. B. (2014). Modeling and measuring epistemic cognition: A qualitative re-investigation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(1), 12–28. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.10.002 DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.10.002
51. Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L., Alberts, H., Anggono, C. O., Batailler, C. Birt, A. R., Zwienenberg, M. (2016). A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 546–573 10.1177/1745691616652873
52. Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 371–388. 10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371 DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371
53. Haig, B. D. (2013). Detecting psychological phenomena: Taking bottom-up research seriously. American Journal of Psychology, 126(2), 135–153. 10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.2.0135 DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.2.0135
54. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1993). Self-regulated strategy development: A part of the writing process. Academic Press.
55. Hattie, J., Hodis, F. A., & Kang, S. H. (2020). Theories of motivation: Integration and ways forward. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101865. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101865 DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101865
56. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29. 10.1038/466029a DOI: 10.1038/466029a
57. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. 10.3102/00346543067001088 DOI: 10.3102/00346543067001088
58. Irvine, E. (2021). The role of replication studies in theory building. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 844–853. 10.1177/1745691620970558 DOI: 10.1177/1745691620970558
59. Jachimowicz, J. M. (2022). Embracing field studies as a tool for learning. Nature Reviews Psychology 1–3 https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00047-x
60. Jackson, C. (2021). Democratizing the development of evidence. Educational Researcher. 10.3102/0013189X211060357 DOI: 10.3102/0013189X211060357
61. Jagers, R. J., Rivas-Drake, D., & Williams, B. (2019). Transformative social and emotional learning (SEL): Toward SEL in service of educational equity and excellence. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 162–184. 10.1080/00461520.2019.1623032 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2019.1623032
62. Kellen, D., Davis-Stober, C., Dunn, J. C., & Kalish, M. (2021). The problem of coordination and the pursuit of structural constraints in psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 767–778. 10.31234/osf.io/3eupv DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/3eupv
63. Kidd, I. J., Medina, J., Pohlhaus G. (2017). Introduction to the Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice. In I. J. Kidd, J. Medina, & G. Pohlhaus (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice (pp. 1–9). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315212043
64. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.
65. Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. 10.1037/amp0000151 DOI: 10.1037/amp0000151
66. Linden, A. H., & Hönekopp, J. (2021). Heterogeneity of research results: A new perspective from which to assess and promote progress in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 358–376. 10.1177/1745691620964193 DOI: 10.1177/1745691620964193
67. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Patall, E. A., & Pekrun, R. (2016). Adaptive motivation and emotion in education: Research and principles for instructional design. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 228–236. 10.1177/2372732216644450 DOI: 10.1177/2372732216644450
68. Lopez, F. (2022). Can educational psychology by harnessed to make changes for the greater good? Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 114–130. 10.1080/00461520.2022.2052293 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2022.2052293
69. Makel, M. C., Hodges, J., Cook, B. G., & Plucker, J. A. (2021). Both questionable and open research practices are prevalent in education research. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 493–504. 10.3102/0013189X211001356 DOI: 10.3102/0013189X211001356
70. Matthews, J. S., & López, F. (2020). Race-reimaging educational psychology research: Investigating constructs through the lens of race and culture. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101878. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101878 DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101878
71. Maxwell, J. A. (2021). Why qualitative methods are necessary for generalization. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 111–118. 10.1037/qup0000173 DOI: 10.1037/qup0000173
72. McGann, M., & Speelman, C. P. (2020). Two kinds of theory: What psychology can learn from Einstein. Theory & Psychology, 30(5), 674–689. 10.1177/0959354320937804 DOI: 10.1177/0959354320937804
73. McKeown, D. Brindle, M. Harris, K. R. Sandmel, K. Steinbrecher, T. D. Graham, S. … Oakes, W. P. (2019). Teachers’ voices: Perceptions of effective professional development and classwide implementation of self-regulated strategy development in writing. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 753–791 10.3102/0002831218804146
74. McPhetres, J. Albayrak-Aydemir, N. Barbosa. A Mendes Chow, E. C. Gonzalez-Marquez, P. Loukras, E. … Volodko, K. (2021). A decade of theory as reflected in Psychological Science (2009–2019). PLoS ONE, 16(3), e0247986 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247986
75. Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(4), 806–834. 10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.806 DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.806
76. Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66(1), 195–244. 10.2466/pr0.1990.66.1.195 DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1990.66.1.195
77. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). Macmillan.
78. Meyer, D. K., & Schutz, P. A. (2020). Why talk about qualitative and mixed methods in educational psychology? Introduction to Special Issue. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 193–196. 10.1080/00461520.2020.1796671 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2020.1796671
79. Mischel, W. (2008). The toothbrush problem. APS Observer, 21(11). https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/ the-toothbrush-problem
80. Munafò, M. R. Nosek, B. A. Bishop, D. V. Button, K. S. Chambers, C. D. Sert, N. P. Du … Ioannidis, J.P. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour 1(1), 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
81. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3–53. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1019 DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
82. Murphy, J., Vallières, F., Bentall, R. P., et al. (2021). Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Nature Communications, 12, 29. 10.1038/s41467-020-20226-9 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20226-9
83. Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behavior, 3(3), 221–229. 10.1038/s41562-018-0522-1 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0522-1
84. Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1596–1618. 10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2
85. O’Doherty, K. C. (2020). Theoretical dialogue and interdisciplinary relevance: Thirty years of Theory & Psychology. Theory & Psychology, 30(6), 745–758. 10.1177/0959354320981420 DOI: 10.1177/0959354320981420
86. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
87. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
88. Patall, E. A. (2021). Implications of the open science era for educational psychology research syntheses. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 142–160. 10.1080/00461520.2021.1897009 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1897009
89. Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical growth in the college years. Holt, Reinhart, & Wilson.
90. Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Piaget. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186. 10.1002/tea.3660020306 DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660020306
91. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667. 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667 DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
92. Plaut, V. C. (2010). Diversity science: Why and how difference makes a difference. Psychological Inquiry, 21(2), 77–99. 10.1080/10478401003676501 DOI: 10.1080/10478401003676501
93. Popham, W. J. (1997). Consequential validity: Right concern, wrong concept. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 9–13. 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00586.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00586.x
94. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.
95. Reber, R. (2016). The theory crisis in psychology. Psychology Today.
96. Säljö, R. (2009). Learning, theories of learning, and units of analysis in research. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 202–208. 10.1080/00461520903029030 DOI: 10.1080/00461520903029030
97. Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199–201. 10.1207/s15326985ep3904_1 DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep3904_1
98. Scheel, et al. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 744–755. 10.31234/osf.io/vekpu DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/vekpu
99. Schraw, G., Wadkins, T., & Olafson, L. (2007). Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 12–25. 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.12 DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.12
100. Schroeder, N. L., & Kucera, A. C. (2022). Refutation text facilitates learning: A meta-analysis of between-subjects experimented. Educational Psychology Review. 10.1007/s10648-021-09656-z DOI: 10.1007/s10648-021-09656-z
101. Skinner, E. A., Rickert, N. P., Vollet, J. W., & Kindermann, T. A. (2022). The complex social ecology of academic development: A bioecological framework and illustration examining the collective effects of parents, teachers, and peers on student engagement. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 87–113. 10.1080/00461520.2022.2038603 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2022.2038603
102. Smaldino, P. (2019). Better methods can’t make up for mediocre theory. Nature, 575, 9. 10.1038/d41586-019-03350-5 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03350-5
103. Spencer, S. J., Logel, C., & Davies, P. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 415–437. 10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235
104. Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2021). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 717–724. 10.1177/1745691620966796 DOI: 10.1177/1745691620966796
105. Teo, T. (2020). Theorizing in psychology: From the critique of a hyper-science to conceptualizing subjectivity. Theory & Psychology, 30(6), 759–767. 10.1177/0959354320930271 DOI: 10.1177/0959354320930271
106. Thacker, I., Sinatra, G. M., Muis, K. R., Danielson, R. W., Pekrun, R., Winne, P. H., & Chevrier, M. (2020). Using persuasive refutation texts to prompt attitudinal and conceptual change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1085–1099. 10.1037/edu0000434 DOI: 10.1037/edu0000434
107. Usher, E. L. (2018). Acknowledging the whiteness of motivation research: Seeking cultural relevance. Educational Psychologist, 53(2), 131–144. 10.1080/00461520.2018.1442220 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1442220
108. Zee van der, T. Reich, J. (2018). Open Education Science. AERA Open 4 3 https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418787466
109. van Rooij, I., & Baggio, G. (2020). Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7qbpr
110. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
111. Wentzel, K. R. (2021). Open science reforms: Strengths, challenges, and future directions. Educational Psychologist, 56(2), 161–173. 10.1080/00461520.2021.1901709 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1901709
112. Willingham, D. T. (2017). A mental model of the learner: Teaching the basic science of educational psychology to future teachers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 11(4), 166–175. 10.1111/mbe.12155 DOI: 10.1111/mbe.12155
113. Winne, P. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(4), 173–187. 10.1207/s15326985ep3004_2 DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep3004_2
114. Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. 10.1080/00461520.2013.794676 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2013.794676
115. Zengilowski, A., Schuetze, B. A., Nash, B. L., & Schallert, D. L. (2021). A critical review of the refutation text literature: Methodological confounds, theoretical problems, and possible solutions. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 175–195. 10.1080/00461520.2020.1861948 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2020.1861948
116. BJ Zimmerman DH SchunkEds 2002 Educational psychology: A century of contributions: A Project of Division 15 (educational Psychology) of the American Psychological Society Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734255
117. Zusho, A., & Kumar, R. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Critical reflections and future directions in the study of race, ethnicity, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 53(2), 61–63. 10.1080/00461520.2018.1432362 DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1432362