메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 212-225

Validating test score meaning and defending test score use: different aims, different methods

Author keywords

justification; validation; validity

Indexed keywords


EID: 84939486974     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2015.1063479     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (41)

References (41)
  • 1
    • 84973520846 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
    • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education [AERA, APA, NCME]. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    • (2014) Standards for educational and psychological testing
  • 4
    • 84926966226 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Test validity in cognitive assessment
    • Leighton J.P., Gierl M.J., (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • D.Borsboom,, & G.J.Mellenbergh, (2007). Test validity in cognitive assessment. In J.P.Leighton & M.J.Gierl (Eds.), Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education (pp. 85–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611186
    • (2007) Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education , pp. 85-116
    • Borsboom, D.1    Mellenbergh, G.J.2
  • 6
    • 57149089321 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Perspectives on the evolution and future of educational measurement
    • Brennan R.L., (ed), 4th ed., Westport, CT: Praeger
    • R.L.Brennan, (2006). Perspectives on the evolution and future of educational measurement. In R.L.Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 1–16). Westport, CT: Praeger.
    • (2006) Educational measurement , pp. 1-16
    • Brennan, R.L.1
  • 7
    • 33846441967 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Test fairness
    • Brennan R.L., (ed), 4th ed., Westport, CT: Praeger
    • G.Camilli, (2006). Test fairness. In R.L.Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 221–256). Westport, CT: Praeger.
    • (2006) Educational measurement , pp. 221-256
    • Camilli, G.1
  • 8
    • 2442455446 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (RR No. 11), Atlanta, GA: Author
    • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999, September 17). Framework for program evaluation in public health. (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (RR No. 11)). pp. 1–58. Atlanta, GA: Author.
    • (1999) Framework for program evaluation in public health , pp. 1-58
  • 10
    • 84861991071 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Defining and distinguishing validity: Interpretations of score meaning and justifications of test use
    • G.J.Cizek, (2012). Defining and distinguishing validity: Interpretations of score meaning and justifications of test use. Psychological Methods, 17, 31–43.10.1037/a0026975
    • (2012) Psychological Methods , vol.17 , pp. 31-43
    • Cizek, G.J.1
  • 11
    • 0000351798 scopus 로고
    • Training in measurement: Always the bridesmaid
    • J.D.Cone,, & S.L.Foster, (1991). Training in measurement: Always the bridesmaid. American Psychologist, 46, 653–654.10.1037/0003-066X.46.6.653
    • (1991) American Psychologist , vol.46 , pp. 653-654
    • Cone, J.D.1    Foster, S.L.2
  • 12
    • 33845945922 scopus 로고
    • Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests
    • L.J.Cronbach, (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.10.1007/BF02310555
    • (1951) Psychometrika , vol.16 , pp. 297-334
    • Cronbach, L.J.1
  • 13
    • 0001960725 scopus 로고
    • Test validation
    • Thorndike R.L., (ed), 2nd ed., Washington, DC: American Council on Education
    • L.J.Cronbach, (1971). Test validation. In R.L.Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 443–507). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
    • (1971) Educational measurement , pp. 443-507
    • Cronbach, L.J.1
  • 15
    • 0000666813 scopus 로고
    • Must all tests be valid?
    • R.L.Ebel, (1961). Must all tests be valid? American Psychologist, 16, 640–647.10.1037/h0045478
    • (1961) American Psychologist , vol.16 , pp. 640-647
    • Ebel, R.L.1
  • 18
    • 0000932942 scopus 로고
    • On Trinitarian doctrines of validity
    • R.M.Guion, (1980). On Trinitarian doctrines of validity. Professional Psychology, 11, 385–398.10.1037/0735-7028.11.3.385
    • (1980) Professional Psychology , vol.11 , pp. 385-398
    • Guion, R.M.1
  • 20
    • 70249148648 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Validity in psychological testing and scientific realism
    • S.B.Hood, (2009). Validity in psychological testing and scientific realism. Theory and Psychology, 19, 451–473.10.1177/0959354309336320
    • (2009) Theory and Psychology , vol.19 , pp. 451-473
    • Hood, S.B.1
  • 22
    • 33846423101 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Validation
    • Brennan R., (ed), 4th ed., Westport, CT: Praeger
    • M.T.Kane, (2006). Validation. In R.Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: Praeger.
    • (2006) Educational measurement , pp. 17-64
    • Kane, M.T.1
  • 23
    • 77956628177 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores
    • Lissitz R.W., (ed), Charlotte, NC: Information Age
    • M.T.Kane, (2009). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. In R.W.Lissitz (Ed.), The concept of validity (pp. 39–64). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
    • (2009) The concept of validity , pp. 39-64
    • Kane, M.T.1
  • 25
    • 42349108647 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A suggested change in terminology and emphasis regarding validity and education
    • R.W.Lissitz,, & K.Samuelsen, (2007). A suggested change in terminology and emphasis regarding validity and education. Educational Researcher, 36, 437–448.10.3102/0013189X07311286
    • (2007) Educational Researcher , vol.36 , pp. 437-448
    • Lissitz, R.W.1    Samuelsen, K.2
  • 28
    • 0000787389 scopus 로고
    • The standard problem: Meaning and values in measurement and evaluation
    • S.Messick, (1975). The standard problem: Meaning and values in measurement and evaluation. American Psychologist, 30, 955–966.10.1037/0003-066X.30.10.955
    • (1975) American Psychologist , vol.30 , pp. 955-966
    • Messick, S.1
  • 29
    • 0002353120 scopus 로고
    • Validity
    • Linn R.L., (ed), 3rd ed., New York, NY: Macmillan
    • S.Messick, (1989). Validity. In R.L.Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). New York, NY: Macmillan.
    • (1989) Educational measurement , pp. 13-103
    • Messick, S.1
  • 30
    • 11944265594 scopus 로고
    • Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning
    • S.Messick, (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
    • (1995) American Psychologist , vol.50 , pp. 741-749
    • Messick, S.1
  • 31
    • 0032433059 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Test validity: A matter of consequence
    • S.Messick, (1998). Test validity: A matter of consequence. Social Indicators Research, 45, 35–44.10.1023/A:1006964925094
    • (1998) Social Indicators Research , vol.45 , pp. 35-44
    • Messick, S.1
  • 32
    • 84883775614 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Standards for talking and thinking about validity
    • P.E.Newton,, & S.D.Shaw, (2013). Standards for talking and thinking about validity. Psychological Methods, 18, 301–319.10.1037/a0032969
    • (2013) Psychological Methods , vol.18 , pp. 301-319
    • Newton, P.E.1    Shaw, S.D.2
  • 34
    • 84982646810 scopus 로고
    • The logic of evaluation and evaluation practice
    • M.Scriven, (1995). The logic of evaluation and evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 1995, 49–70.10.1002/ev.v1995:68
    • (1995) New Directions for Evaluation , vol.1995 , pp. 49-70
    • Scriven, M.1
  • 38
    • 84976302647 scopus 로고
    • July, Paper presented at the Content Validity II Conference, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH:
    • M.L.Tenopyr, (1975, July). Content-construct confusion. Paper presented at the Content Validity II Conference, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.
    • (1975) Content-construct confusion
    • Tenopyr, M.L.1
  • 41
    • 36749029867 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Validity: Foundational issues and statistical methodology
    • Rao C.R., Sinharay S., (eds), Amsterdam: Elsevier Science
    • B.D.Zumbo, (2007). Validity: Foundational issues and statistical methodology. In C.R.Rao & S.Sinharay (Eds.), Psychometrics (pp. 45–79). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
    • (2007) Psychometrics , pp. 45-79
    • Zumbo, B.D.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.