Expressive responses to news stories about extremist groups: A framing experiment

Journal of Communication

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 271-288

  Boyle, Michael P ^a   Schmierbach, Mike ^b   Armstrong, Cory L ^c   Cho, Jaeho ^d   McCluskey, Michael ^e   McLeod, Douglas M ^d   Shah, Dhavan V ^d  

^a WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b School of Business   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^e Department of Mass Communication and Journalism ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEDIA ROLE; NATIONAL SECURITY;

EID: 33646059508     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00019.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2. Chong D. (1993). How people think, reason and feel about rights and liberties. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 867-899.
3. Chwe M. S. Y. (1999). Structure and strategy in collective action. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 128-156.
4. Davis, D. W., & Silver, B. D. (2004). Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 28-46.
5. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37.
6. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
8. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Keum, H., Hillback, E. D., Rojas, H., Gilde Zuniga, H., Shah, D. V., & McLeod, D. M. (2006). Personifying the radical: How news framing polarizes security concerns and tolerance judgments. Human Communication Research, 32, 1-25.
10. Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potential networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociology Review, 52, 519-531.
11. Kuklinski, J. H., Riggle, E., Ottati, V., Schwarz, N., & Wyer, R. S. (1991). The cognitive and affective bases of political tolerance judgments. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 1-27.
12. Macy, M. W. (1991). Chains of cooperation: Threshold effects in collective action. American Sociological Review, 56, 730-747.
13. Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss-Morse, E., & Wood, S. L. (1995). With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. McLeod, D. M. (1995). Communicating deviance: The effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 39, 4-19.
15. McLeod, D. M., & Detenber, B. H. (1999). Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Communication, 49, 3-23.
16. McLeod, D. M., & Hertog, J. K. (1992). The manufacture of public opinion by reporters: Informal cues for public perceptions of protest groups. Discourse and Society, 3, 259-275.
17. McLeod, D. M., & Hertog, J. K. (1999). Social control and the mass media's role in the regulation of protest groups: The communicative acts perspective. In D. Demers & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Mass media, social control and social change. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
18. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation in a public forum. Political Communication, 16, 315-336.
19. Mueller, J. (1988). Trends in political tolerance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 1-25.
20. Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567-583.
21. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19, 221-246.
22. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence. Public opinnion- Our social skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
23. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-75.
24. Petric, G., & Pinter, A. (2002). From social perception to public expression of opinion: A structural equation modeling approach to the spiral of silence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14, 37-53.
25. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1996). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26. Scheufele, D. A., & Eveland, W. P. (2001). Perceptions of "public opinion" and "public" opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 25-44.
27. Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (2000). Twenty-five years of the spiral of silence: A conceptual review and empirical outlook. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 3-28.
28. Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., & Lee, E. (2001). Real talk: Manipulating the dependent variable in spiral of silence research. Communication Research, 28, 304-324.
29. Shah, D. V., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. B. (1996). "To thine own self be true": Values, framing and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research, 23, 509-560.
30. Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., & Zubric, J. (2003). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30, 102-120.
31. Sullivan, J. L., & Marcus, G. E. (1988). A note on "Trends in political tolerance."Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 26-32.
32. Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Susskind, J., Maurer, K., Thakkar, V., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, J. W. (1999). Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 181-191.
34. Wilson, T. C. (1994). Trends in tolerance toward rightist and leftist groups, 1976-1988: Effects of attitude change and cohort succession. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 539-556.
35. Wyatt, R. O., Kim, J., & Katz, E. (2000). How feeling free to talk affects ordinary political conversation, purposeful argumentation, and civic participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 99-114.
36. Zillmann, D. (1999). Exemplification theory: Judging the whole by some of its parts. Media Psychology, 1, 69-94.
37. Zillmann, D. (2002). Exemplification theory of media influence. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 19-41). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.