Codeswitching in the L2 classroom: A communication and learning strategy

Educational Linguistics

Volumn 5, Issue , 2005, Pages 63-84

  Macaro, Ernesto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive load; Input modification; Language acquisition; Language teacher; Target language

Indexed keywords

EID: 85091189109     PISSN: 15720292     EISSN: 22151656     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-24565-0_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Asher, C. (1993). Using The target language as the medium of instruction in the communicative classroom: The influence of practice on principle. Studies in Modern Languages Education, 1, 53-71.
2. Baddeley, A.D., & Logie, R.H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple-component model. In A. Myake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 28-61.
3. Bailey, N., Madden, C. & Krashen, S. (1974). Is there a ‘natural sequence’ in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24(2), 235-243.
4. Bishop, G. (2000). Dictionaries, examinations and stress. Language Learning Journal, 21, 57-65.
5. Brown, T.S. & Perry, F.L. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 655-670.
6. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Chung, J. M. (1999). The effects of using video texts supported with advance organizers and captions on Chinese college students’ listening comprehension: An empirical study. Foreign Language Annals, 32(3), 295-308.
8. Clark, A., & Trafford, J. (1996). Return to gender: Boys’ and girls’ attitudes and achievements. Language Learning Journal, 14, 40-49.
9. Cohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.
10. Cohen, A.D. & Brooks-Carson, A. (2001). Research on direct versus translated writing: Students’ strategies and their results. Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 169-188.
11. Department of Education and Science (1990). National curriculum modern foreign languages working group: Initial advice. London: HMSO.
12. Department of Education for Northern Ireland (1985). Good practice in education. Paper 2. Modern languages teaching in Northern Ireland. Bangor, Northern Ireland: Department of Education for Northern Ireland.
13. Di Pietro, R.J. (1987). Strategic interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Dickson, P. (1992). Using the target language in modern foreign language classrooms. Slough: NFER.
15. Duff, P.A. & Polio, C.G. (1990). How much foreign language is there in the foreign language classroom? Modern Language Journal, 74(2), 154-166.
16. Dulay, H. & Burt, M. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37-53.
17. Friedlander, A. (1990). Composing in English: Effects of first language on writing in English as a second language. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 109-125.
18. Harley, B. (2000). Listening strategies in ESL: Do age and L1 make a difference? TESOL Quarterly, 34(4), 769-777.
19. Hopkins, S. (1989). Use of the mother tongue in the teaching of English as a second language to adults. TESOL Quarterly, 2(1), 18-24.
20. Jones, B., Jones, G., Demetriou, H., Downes, P. & Ruddock J. (2001). Boys’ performance in modern foreign languages: Listening to the learners. London: CILT.
21. Kern, R.G. (1994). The role of mental translation in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(4), 441-61.
22. Knight, S. (1996). Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities. Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 285-299.
23. Kobayashi, H. & Rinnert, C. (1992). Effects of first language on second language writing: Translation versus direct composition. Language Learning, 42(2), 183-215.
24. Krashen, S.D. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Hemel: Prentice Hall.
25. Krashen, S.D. & Terrell, T.D. (1988). The Natural Approach. London: Prentice Hall.
26. Lally, C.G. (2000). First language influences in second language composition: The effect of pre-writing. Foreign Language Annals, 33(4), 428-432.
27. Libben, G. (2000). Representation and processing in the second language lexicon: The homogeneity hypothesis. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. Oxford: Blackwell. 228-248.
28. Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379. 259-278.
29. Lotto, L. & de Groot, A. M. B. (1998). Effects of learning method and word type on acquiring vocabulary in an unfamiliar language. Language Learning, 48(1), 31-69.
30. Macaro, E. (1997). Target language collaborative learning and autonomy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
31. Macaro, E. (2000a). Issues in target language teaching. In K. Field (Ed.), Issues in modern foreign language teaching. London: Routledge. 171-189.
32. Macaro, E. (2000b). Learner strategies in foreign language learning: Cross-national factors. Tuttitalia, 22, 9-18.
33. Macaro, E. (2001a). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms. London: Continuum.
34. Macaro, E. (2001b). Analysing student teachers’ codeswitching in foreign language classrooms: Theories and decision making. Modern Language Journal, 85(4), 531-548.
35. Macaro, E. & Mutton, T. (2002). Developing language teachers through a co-researcher model. Language Learning Journal, 25, 27-39.
36. Myake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.) (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Neather, T., Woods, C., Rodriguez, I., Davis, M. & Dunne, E. (1995). Target language testing in modern foreign languages. Report of a project commissioned by the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority. London: SCAA.
38. Office for Standards in Education — OFSTED (1993). Handbook. Inspection schedule. London: HMSO.
39. Office for Standards in Education — OFSTED (1995). Modern foreign languages: A review of inspection findings 1993/94. London: HMSO.
40. Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
41. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes and outcomes. Language Learning, 44(3), 493-527.
42. Prahbu, N.S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Prince, P. (1996). Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translations as a function of proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 478-493.
44. Qi, D.S. (1998). An inquiry into language switching in second language composing processes. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(3), 413-435.
45. Sinclair, J. & Brazil D. (1982). Teacher talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, R.M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.M. (1999). Instruction, first language influence and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 1-22.
49. Stables, A. & Wikeley, F. (1999). From bad to worse? Pupils’ attitudes to modern foreign languages at ages 14 and 15. Language Learning Journal, 20, 27-31.
50. Tarone, E. & Swain, M. (1995). A sociolinguistic perspective on second language use in immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 79(2), 166-78.
51. Weinreich, U. (1953) (cited in Libben). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.