Sucrose replacement: a sensory profile and time-intensity analysis of a tamarind functional beverage with artificial and natural non-nutritive sweeteners

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2021, Pages 593-602

  Sousa Lima, Rafael ^a   Cazelatto de Medeiros, Alessandra ^a   André Bolini, Helena Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

acceptance; functional food; sweeteners; time intensity

Indexed keywords

FLAVORING AGENT; NONNUTRITIVE SWEETENER; PLANT EXTRACT; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENT;

BEVERAGE; CHEMISTRY; FRUIT; HUMAN; TAMARIND; TASTE;

BEVERAGES; FLAVORING AGENTS; FRUIT; HUMANS; NON-NUTRITIVE SWEETENERS; PLANT EXTRACTS; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENTS; TAMARINDUS; TASTE;

EID: 85089565333     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10671     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Costa AGV, Garcia-Diaz DF, Jimenez P and Silva PI, Bioactive compounds and health benefits of exotic tropical red-black berries. J Funct Foods 5:539–549 (2013).
2. Ishola MM, Agbaji EB and Agbaji AS, A chemical study of Tamarindus indica (Tsamiya) fruits grown in Nigeria. J Sci Food Agric 51:141–143 (1990).
3. Bhadoriya SS, Mishra V, Raut S, Ganeshpurkar A and Jain SK, Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activities of a hydroethanolic extract of Tamarindus indica leaves. Sci Pharm 80:685–700 (2012).
4. Bhadoriya SS, Ganeshpurkar A, Narwaria J, Rai G and Jain AP, Tamarindus indica: extent of explored potential. Pharmacogn Rev 5:73–81 (2011).
5. Vialta A, Rego RA, Brasil Ingredients Trends 2020, 1st edn. Campinas, São Paulo: ITAL; (2014).
6. Carbonell-Capella JM, Buniowska M, Esteve MJ and Frígola A, Effect of Stevia rebaudiana addition on bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of beverages based on exotic fruits mixed with oat following simulated human digestion. Food Chem 184:122–130 (2015).
7. Bleakley A, Jordan A, Mallya G, Hennessy M and Piotrowski JT, Do you know what your kids are drinking? Evaluation of a media campaign to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Am J Health Promot 32:1409–1416 (2017).
8. De Ruyter JC, Olthof MR, Seidell JC and Katan MB, A trial of sugar-free or sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight in children. N Engl J Med 367:1397–1406 (2012).
9. Carocho M, Morales P and Ferreira ICFR, Sweeteners as food additives in the XXI century: A review of what is known, and what is to come. Food Chem Toxicol 107:302–317 (2017).
10. Iannario M, Manisera M, Piccolo D and Zuccolotto P, Sensory analysis in the food industry as a tool for marketing decisions. Adv Data Anal Classif 6:303–321 (2012).
11. Brasil. Resolução No 19, de 30 de abril de 1999. [Online]. ANVISA (1999). Available: http://www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/inspecao/produtos-vegetal/legislacao-1/biblioteca-de-normas-vinhos-e-bebidas/resolucao-no-19-de-30-de-abril-de-1999.pdf/view [07 December 2018]
12. Lima RS and Bolini HMA, Impact of Non-nutritive Sweeteners on the Sensory Profile and Acceptance of a Functional Tamarind Beverage. J Food Nutr Res 8:26–32 (2020).
13. Meilgaard M, Civille GV and Carr BT, Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 4th edn. Florida: CRC Press; (2006).
14. de Oliveira Rocha IF and Bolini HMA, Different sweeteners in passion fruit juice: Ideal and equivalent sweetness. LWT – Food Sci Technol 62:861–867 (2015).
15. Moskowitz HR, Ratio scales of sugar sweetness. Percept Psychophys 7:315–320 (1970).
16. AOAC International, Official Methods of Analysis, 16th edn. Washington, D.C.: AOAC Intl; (1995).
17. Sabato SF, da Silva JM, da Cruz JN, Salmieri S, Rela PR and Lacroix M, Study of physical-chemical and sensorial properties of irradiated Tommy Atkins mangoes (Mangifera indica L.) in an international consignment. Food Control 20:284–288 (2009).
18. de Oliveira Rocha IF and Bolini HMA, Passion fruit juice with different sweeteners: sensory profile by descriptive analysis and acceptance. Food Sci Nutr 3:129–139 (2015).
19. BIOSYSTEMES. Fizz Sensory Software versão 2.40H. 2009.
20. Dooley L, seung LY and Meullenet JF, The application of check-all-that-apply (CATA) consumer profiling to preference mapping of vanilla ice cream and its comparison to classical external preference mapping. Food Qual Prefer 21:394–401 (2010).
21. Ares G and Jaeger SR, Check-all-that-apply questions: influence of attribute order on sensory product characterization. Food Qual Prefer 28:141–153 (2013).
22. Ares G, Bruzzone F, Vidal L, Cadena RS, Giménez A, Pineau B et al., Evaluation of a rating-based variant of check-all-that-apply questions: rate-all-that-apply (RATA). Food Qual Prefer 36:87–95 (2014).
23. Cadena RS and Bolini HMA, Time-intensity analysis and acceptance test for traditional and light vanilla ice cream. Food Res Int 44:677–683 (2011).
24. Palazzo AB and Bolini HMA, Multiple time-intensity analysis and acceptance of raspberry flavored gelatin. J Sens Stud 24:648–663 (2009).
25. Addinsoft. XLSTAT statistical analysis software. (2007).
26. Fleming EE, Ziegler GR and Hayes JE, Check-all-that-apply (CATA), sorting, and polarized sensory positioning (PSP) with astringent stimuli. Food Qual Prefer 45:41–49 (2015).
27. Rossini K, Verdun S, Cariou V, Qannari EM and Fogliatto FS, PLS discriminant analysis applied to conventional sensory profiling data. Food Qual Prefer 23:18–24 (2012).
28. Abreu DA, Silva LMR, Lima A da S, Maia GA, De Figueiredo RW and Sousa PHM, Desenvolvimento De Bebidas Mistas À Base De Manga, Maracujá E Caju Adicionadas De Prebióticos. Aliment e Nutr 22:197–203 (2011).
29. De Sousa PHM, Maia GA, De Azeredo HMC, De Souza Filho MDSM, Garruti DDS and De Freitas CAS, Mixed tropical fruit nectars with added energy components. Int J Food Sci Technol 42:1290–1296 (2007).
30. Cadena RS, Cruz AG, Netto RR, Castro WF, Faria J de AF and Bolini HMA, Sensory profile and physicochemical characteristics of mango nectar sweetened with high intensity sweeteners throughout storage time. Food Res Int 54:1670–1679 (2013).
31. Brusick D, Grotz VL, Slesinski R, Kruger CL and Hayes AW, The absence of genotoxicity of sucralose. Food Chem Toxicol 48:3067–3072 (2010).
32. Quinlan ME and Jenner MR, Analysis and stability of the sweetener sucralose in beverages. J. Food Sci 5:244–246 (1990).
33. de Carvalho MVO, de Oliveira L d L, Melo L and Costa AM, Pre-harvest factors related to sensory profile of Passiflora setacea nectars, a wild passion fruit from Brazilian savannah. J Sci Food Agric 98:5711–5722 (2018).
34. Waehrens SS, Grønbeck MS, Olsen K and Byrne DV, Impact of consumer associations, emotions, and appropriateness for use on food acceptability: A CATA and liking evaluation of vegetable and berry beverages. J Sens Stud 33:1–9 (2018).
35. Cardello HMAB, Da Silva MAPA and Damasio MH, Measurement of the relative sweetness of stevia extract, aspartame and cyclamate/saccharin blend as compared to sucrose at different concentrations. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 54:119–130 (1999).
36. Rego RA, Vialta A, Madi LFC, Brasil Beverage Trends 2020, 1st edn. Campinas, São Paulo: ITAL; (2016).
37. Labbe D, Gilbert F, Antille N and Martin N, Sensory determinants of refreshing. Food Qual Prefer 20:100–109 (2009).
38. Vidal L, Ares G, Hedderley DI, Meyners M and Jaeger SR, Comparison of rate-all-that-apply (RATA) and check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions across seven consumer studies. Food Qual Prefer 67:49–58 (2018).