What do grades mean? Variation in grading criteria in American college and university courses

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2020, Pages 480-500

  Lipnevich, Anastasiya A ^a   Guskey, Thomas R ^b   Murano, Dana M ^c   Smith, Jeffrey K ^d  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c American College Testing Incorporated   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

criteria; Grading; process; product; syllabi

Indexed keywords

EID: 85088579280     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2020.1799190     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Allen, J. D., (2005). Grades as valid measures of academic achievement of classroom learning. The Clearing House, 78 (5), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.78.5.218-223
2. Atkinson, A. C., (1985). Plots, transformations, and regression: An introduction to graphical methods of diagnostic regression analysis. Oxford University Press.
3. Bailey, J., & McTighe, J., (1996). Reporting achievement at the secondary level: What and how? In T. R., Guskey (Ed.), Communicating student learning: ASCD yearbook 1996 (pp. 119–140). ASCD.
4. Bers, T. H., Davis, B. D., & Taylor, B., (2000). The use of syllabi in assessments: Unobtrusive indicators and tools for faculty development. Assessment Update, 12 (3), 4–7.
5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D., (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5 (1), 7–74.
6. Bloom, B. S., (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1 (2), 1–12. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED053419).
7. Bloom, B. S., (1971). Mastery learning. In J. H., Block (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice (pp. 47–63). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
8. Boothroyd, R. A., & McMorris, R. F., (1992). What do teachers know about testing and how did they find out? [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco, CA.
9. Brookhart, S. M., (1991). Grading practices and validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10 (1), 35–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00182.x
10. Brookhart, S. M., (2009). Grading. Pearson Education.
11. Brookhart, S. M., (2011). Starting the conversation about grading. Educational Leadership, 69 (3), 10–14.
12. Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., Bowers, A. J., McMillan, J. H., Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Stevens, M. T., & Welsh, M. E., (2016). A century of grading research: Meaning and value in the most common educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 86 (4), 803–848. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069
13. Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J., (2008). Assessment and grading in classrooms. Pearson Education.
14. Cashwell, C. S., & Young, J. S., (2004). Spirituality in counselor training: A content analysis of syllabi from introductory spirituality courses. Counseling and Values, 48 (2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007X.2004.tb00237.x
15. Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E., (2002). Cognitive test anxiety an academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27 (2), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1094
16. Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S. M., & Rachor, R. E., (1996). Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3 (2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0302_3
17. Cross, L. H., & Frary, R. B., (1999). Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers alike. Applied Measurement in Education, 12 (1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1201_4
18. Dweck, C. S., (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
19. Elwood, J., & Murphy, P., (2015). Assessment systems as cultural scripts: A sociocultural theoretical lens on assessment practice and products. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 22 (2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1021568
20. Fagley, N. S., (1987). Positional response bias in multiple-choice tests of learning: Its relation to testwiseness and guessing strategy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79 (1), 95–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.1.95
21. Gullikson, A. R., (1985). Student evaluation techniques and their relationship to grade and curriculum. Journal of Educational Research, 79 (2), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1985.10885657
22. Guskey, T. R., (1996). Reporting on student learning: Lessons from the past–Prescriptions for the future. In T. R., Guskey (Ed.), Communicating Student Learning. 1996 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 13 - 24). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
23. Guskey, T. R., (2001). Helping standards make the grade. Educational Leadership, September 2010, 20–27.
24. Guskey, T. R., (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and teaching, 8 (3), 381–391. doi: 10.1080/135406002100000512
25. Guskey, T. R., (2006). Making high school grades meaningful. Phi Delta Kappan, 87 (9), 670–675.
26. Guskey, T. R., (2011). Five obstacles to grading reform. Educational Leadership, 69 (3), 16–21.
27. Guskey, T. R., & Link, L., (2019). Exploring the factors teachers consider in determining students’ grades. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26 (3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1555515
28. Hu, S., (Ed.). (2005). Beyond grade inflation: Grading problems in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 30 (6), 1–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3006
29. Klapp, A., (2015). Does grading affect educational attainment? A longitudinal study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 22 (3), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.988121
30. Kovas, M. A., (1993). Make your grading motivating: Keys to performance based evaluation. Quill and Scroll, 68 (1), 10–11.
31. Lawson, J., Rasul, M. G., Howard, P., Martin, F., Hadgraft, R., & Jarman, R., (2015). Getting it right: The case for supervisors assessing process in capstone projects. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31 (6), 1810–1818.
32. Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K., (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15 (4), 319–339.
33. McMillan, J. H., (2001). Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20 (1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00055.x
34. Milton, O., Pollio, H. R., & Eison, J. A., (1986). Making sense of college grades: Why the grading system does not work and what can be done about it. Jossey-Bass.
35. O’Connor, K., (2009). The last frontier: Tackling the grading dilemma. Solution Tree Press.
36. O’Connor, K., (2010). Grades: When, why, what impact, and how? Education Canada,50 (2), 38–41.
37. Office of Educational Technology; US Department of Education. (2016). Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. 2016 National Educational Technology Plan.
38. Panadero, E., Fraile, J., Fernández Ruiz, J., Castilla-Estévez, D., & Ruiz, M. A., (2019). Spanish university assessment practices: Examination tradition with diversity by faculty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44 (3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1512553
39. Randall, J., & Engelhard, G., (2010). Examining the grading practices of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26 (7), 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.008
40. Rathbun, G. A., Leatherman, J., & Jensen, R., (2017). Evaluating the impact of an academic teacher development program: Practical realities of an evidence-based study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42 (4), 548–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1161004
41. Rojstaczer, S., & Healy, C., (2012). Where A is ordinary: The evolution of American college and university grading, 1940–2009. Teachers College Record, 114 (7), 1–23.
42. Royal, K. D., & Guskey, T. R., (2015). A case for differentiated grades. Medical Science Education, 25 (3), 323–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0127-5
43. Sadler, D. R., (2010). Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (6), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902977756
44. Sarnacki, R., (1979). An examination of test-wiseness in the cognitive test domain. Review of Educational Research, 49 (2), 252–279. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002252
45. Scriven, M., (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R., Tyler, R., Gagne, & M., Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives on curriculum evaluation (pp. 1967). Chicago, Rand McNally and Co.
46. Seipp, B., (1991). Anxiety and academic performance: A meta-analysis of findings. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 4 (1), 27–41.
47. Shute, V. J., (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78 (1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
48. Smith, J. K., (1982). Converging on correct answers: A peculiarity of multiple choice items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19 (3), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1982.tb00129.x
49. Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. F., (2019). Grading in higher education. In T. R., Guskey & S. M., Brookhart (Eds.), What we know about grading (pp. 195–213). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
50. Smith, J. K., & Smith, L. F., (2009). The impact of framing effect on student preferences for university grading systems. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35 (4), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.11.001
51. Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., & DeLisi, R., (2001). Natural classroom assessment: Designing seamless instruction & assessment. Corwin Press.
52. Stanny, C., Gonzalez, M., & McGowan, B., (2015). Assessing the culture of teaching and learning through a syllabus review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40 (7), 898–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.956684
53. Stiggins, R. J., (2008). Report cards: Assessments for learning. In Student-involved assessment for learning (5th ed., pp. 267–310). Prentice.
54. Taras, M., (2005). Assessment–summative and formative–some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53 (4), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x
55. Tippin, G. K., Lafrenier, K. D., & Page, S., (2012). Student perception of academic grading: Personality, academic orientation, and effort. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13 (1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411429187
56. Turner, K., Roberts, L., Heal, C., & Wright, L., (2013). Oral presentation as a form of summative assessment in a master’s level PGCE module: The student perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38 (6), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.680016
57. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D., (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211 (4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
58. Usherwood, T., Challis, M., Joesbury, H., & Hannay, D., (1995). Competence-based summative assessment of a student-directed course: Involvement of key stakeholders. Medical Education, 29 (2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1995.tb02818.x
59. Webb, C., Endacott, R., Gray, M. A., Jasper, M. A., McMullan, M., & Scholes, J., (2003). Evaluating portfolio assessment systems: What are the appropriate criteria? Nurse Education Today, 23 (8), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-6917(03)00098-4
60. Wiggins, G., (1996). Honesty and fairness: Toward better grading and reporting. In T. R., Guskey (Ed.), Communicating student learning: 1996 yearbook of the association for supervision and curriculum development (pp. 141–176). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
61. Zeidner, M., (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts and findings. In P. A., Schutz & R., Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 165). Elsevier.