Helping standards make the GRADE

Educational Leadership

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 20-27

  Guskey, Thomas R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035599616     PISSN: 00131784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13-18.
2. Brookhart, S. M. (1991). Grading practices and validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(1), 35-36.
3. Brookhart, S. M. (1993). Teachers' grading practices: Meaning and values. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(2), 123-142.
4. Frary, R. B., Cross, L. H., & Weber, L. J. (1993). Testing and grading practices and opinions of secondary teachers of academic subjects: Implications for instruction in measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 23-30.
5. Friedman, S. J., & Frisbie, D. A. (1995). The influence of report cards on the validity of grades reported to parents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(1), 5-26.
6. Gronlund, N. E. (2000). How to write and use instructional objectives (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
7. Guskey, T. R. (1996). Reporting on student learning: Lessons from the past-Prescriptions for the future. In T. R. Guskey (Ed.), Communicating student learning: 1996 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 13-24). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
8. Guskey, T. R. (1999). Making standards work. The School Administrator, 56(9), 44.
9. Guskey, T. R., & Bailey, J. M. (2001). Developing grading and reporting systems for student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
10. Haladyna, T. M. (1999). A complete guide to student grading. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Endina, MN: Interaction.
12. Kendall, J. S., & Marzano, R. J. (1995). The systematic identification and articulation of content standards and benchmarks: Update. Aurora, CO: McREL.
13. Kovas, M. A. (1993). Make your grading motivating: Keys to performance-based evaluation. Quill and Scroll, 68(1), 10-11.
14. Krumboltz J. D., & Yeh, C. J. (1996). Competitive grading sabotages good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(4), 324-326.
15. Marzano, R. J. (1999). Building curriculum and assessment around standards. The High School Magazine, 6(5), 14-19.
16. Marzano, R. J. (2000). Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
17. O'Connor, K. (1999). How to grade for learning. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.
18. Ornstein, A. C. (1994). Grading practices and policies: An overview and some suggestions. NASSP Bulletin, 78(559), 55-64.
19. Shuster, C., Lemma, P., Lynch, T., & Nadeau, K. (1996). A study of kindergarten and 1st grade report cards: What are young children expected to learn? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
20. Stiggins, R. J. (2001). Student-involved classroom assessment (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
21. Tomlinson, T. (1992). Hard work and high expectations: Motivating students to learn. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
22. Truog, A. L., & Friedman, S. J. (1996). Evaluating high school teachers' written grading policies from a measurement perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York.
23. Wiggins, G. (1996). Honesty and fairness: Toward better grading and reporting. In T. R. Guskey (Ed.), Communicating student learning: 1996 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 141-176). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
24. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.