A Case for Differentiated Grades

Medical Science Educator

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 323-325

  Royal, Kenneth D ^a   Guskey, Thomas R ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962392949     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21568650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40670-015-0127-5     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. DeSantis N. University can deny a medical degree over lack of ‘Professionalism,’ court rules. 2015. From http://chronicle.com/blogs/ticker/university-can-deny-a-medical-degree-over-lack-of-professionalism-court-rules/92935. Accessed on February 6, 2015.
2. Chen, PW. Why failing med students don’t get failing grades. The New York Times. 28 Feb. 2013. The New York Times Health/Science Blog. Accessed February 6, 2015.
3. Messick S. Validity. In: Linn RL, editor. Educational Measurement. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co; 1989. p. 13–103.
4. Royal KD, Puffer JC. The consequential validity of ABFM examinations. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014;27(3):430–1.
5. Guskey TR. Making high school grades meaningful. Phi Delta Kappan. 2006;87(9):670–6.
6. Guskey TR. Grading policies that work against standards…and how to fix them. In: Guskey TR, editor. Practical solutions to serious problems in standards-based grading. Thousand Oaks: Corwin; 2009. p. 26.
7. Guskey TR, Swan GM, Jung LA. Parents’ and teachers’ perceptions of standards-based and traditional report cards. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April, 2011.
8. Benzinger R. From the desk of the program director: show me the rankings! J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(3):413–4.
9. Alexander EK, Osman NY, Walling JL, Mitchell VG. Variation and imprecision of clerkship grading in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 2012;87(8):1–7.
10. Fazio SB, Papp KK, Torre DM, Defer TM. Grade inflation in the internal medicine clerkship: a national study. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25:71–6.