Maximal input and feedback in production and comprehension

Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 209-228

  Vigliocco, Gabriella ^a   Hartsuiker, Robert J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082914203     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315084503-16     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Altmann, G. T. M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191–238.
2. Arciuli, J., & Cupples, L. (2003). Effects of stress typicality during speeded grammatical classification. Language and Speech, 46, 353–374.
3. Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382–391.
4. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L., D'Amico, S., & Hernandez, A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 847–862.
5. Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.
6. Bock, J. K., Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Some attractions of verb agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 83–128.
7. Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192.
8. Boland, J. E., & Cutler, A. (1996). Interaction with autonomy: Multiple Output models and the inadequacy of the Great Divide. Cognition, 58, 309–320.
9. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.
10. Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 217–229.
11. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.
12. Dell, G. S., & Kim, A. E. (in press). Speech errors and word form encoding. In R. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
13. Druks, J., & Shallice, T. (2000). Selective preservation of naming from description and the –restricted preverbal message.— Brain and Language, 72, 100-128.
14. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 559–586). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
15. Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78–84.
16. Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Vol. 1: Speech and talk (pp. 177–220). London: Academic Press.
17. Garrett, M. F. (1984). The organization of processing structure for language production: Application to aphasic speech. In D. Caplan, A. R. Lecours, & A. Smith (Eds.), Biological perspectives on language (pp. 172–193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Osterhout, L. (1999). The neurocognition of syntactic processing. In C. M. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Hartsuiker, R. J., Corley, M., & Martensen, H. (in press). The lexical bias effect is modulated by context, but the standard monitoring account doesn't fly: Belated reply to Baars, Motley, & MacKay (1975). Journal of Memory and Language.
20. Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1998). Syntactic persistence in Dutch. Language & Speech, 41, 143–184.
21. Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 113–157.
22. Hartsuiker, R. J., Schriefers, H. J., Bock, J. K., & Kikstra, G. M. (2003). Morphological influences on the construction of subject-verb agreement. Memory and Cognition, 31, 1316–1326.
23. Haskell, T. R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2003). Conflicting cues and competition in subject-verb agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 760–778.
24. Humphreys, K. R. (2002). Lexical bias in speech errors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
25. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1978). A functional approach to child language. A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kelly, M. H. (1992). Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review, 99, 349–364.
27. Kempen, G., & Huijbers, P. (1983). The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming: Indirect election of words. Cognition, 14, 185–209.
28. Kita, S., & Ozyiirek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32.
29. Kolk, H. H. J„ Chwilla, D. J., Van Herten, M„ & Oor, P. J. W. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event–related potentials. Brain and Language, 85, 1–36.
30. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
32. Levy, Y. (1983). It's frogs all the way down. Cognition, 15, 75–93.
33. Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Humphreys, W. G. (1997). Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory and Cognition, 25, 18–35.
34. MacKay, D. G. (1992). Awareness and error detection: New theories and research paradigms. Consciousness and Cognition, 1, 199–225.
35. Marx, E. (1999). Gender processing in speech production: Evidence from German speech errors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 601–621.
36. Mattson, M. E., & Baars, B. J. (1992). Error–minimizing mechanisms: Boosting or editing? In B. J. Baars (Ed.), Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition (pp. 263–287). New York: Plenum.
37. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86.
38. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.
39. Norris, D., McQueen, J., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brian Sciences, 23, 299–370.
40. Norris, D., McQueen, J., & Cutler, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204–238.
41. Oomen, C. C. E., & Postma, A. (2001). Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self–monitoring. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 163–184.
42. Oomen, C. C. E., Postma, A., & Kolk, H. H. J. (in press). Speech monitoring in aphasia: Error detection and repair behaviour in a patient with Broca's aphasia. In R. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
43. Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651.
44. Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97–131.
45. Postma, A., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1993). The covert repair hypothesis: prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 472–487.
46. Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460–499.
47. Roelofs, A. (in press). Spoken word planning, comprehending, and selfmonitoring: Evaluation of WEAVER++. In R. Hartsuiker, R. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
48. Schade, U., & Laubenstein, U. (1993). Repairs in a connectionist language-production model. In R. Kohler & B. B. Rieger (Eds.), Contributions to quantitative linguistics (pp. 79–90). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
49. Seidenberg, M., & MacDonald, M. C. (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 569–588.
50. Slobin, D. I. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In E. Wanner & L. R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 128–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Slobin D. I. (1996). From –thought and language— to –thinking for speaking.— In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language: No. 17. Rethinking linguistic relativity & (pp. 70-96). New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
53. Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trues well, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. Miller & P. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Speech, language and cognition (pp. 217–262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
54. Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C. (1995). Computing subject verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological information. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 186–215.
55. Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (1999). When sex and syntax go hand in hand: Gender agreement in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 455-478.
56. Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2002). The interplay of meaning, sound & syntax in language production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442–472.
57. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D., Indefrey, P., Levelt, W., & Hellwig, F. (2004). Role of grammatical gender and semantics in German word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 483–497.