Interaction with autonomy: Multiple output models and the inadequacy of the Great Divide

Cognition

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 309-320

  Boland, Julie E ^a   Cutler, Anne ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MENTAL FUNCTION; REVIEW;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MENTAL PROCESSES; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS;

EID: 0030090671     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00684-2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Altmann, G.T.M., Garnham, A., & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 685-712.
2. Altmann, G.T.M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191-238.
3. Becker, C.A. (1976). Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 556-566.
4. Boland, J.E., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Garnsey, S.M. (1990). Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 413-432.
5. Boland, J.E., Tanenhaus, M.K., Garnsey, S.M., & Carlson, G.N. (1995). Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: evidence from wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 34 (in press).
6. Britt, M.A. (1994). The interaction of referential ambiguity and argument structure: the parsing of prepositional phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 251-283.
7. Conrad, C. (1974). Context effects in sentence comprehension: a study of the subjective lexicon. Memory and Cognition, 2, 130-138.
8. Crain, S., & Steedman, M. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: the use of context by the psychological syntax processor. In D. Dowty, L. Kartunnen, & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing (pp. 320-358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.
10. Ferrcira, F., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348-368.
11. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J.M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 725-745.
12. Fodor, J.A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistic Club.
14. Frazier, L. (1987). Theories of syntactic processing. In J.L. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural language processing (pp. 291-307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Luce, P.A., Pisoni, D.B., & Goldinger, S.D. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In G.T.M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 122-147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
17. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
18. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1993). Issues of process and presentation in lexical access. In G.T.M. Altmann & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting (pp. 187-210). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word-recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
20. Mauner, G., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Carlson, G.N. (1995). Implicit arguments in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 357-382.
21. McClelland, J.L., & Elman, J.L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
22. McElree, B. (1993). The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension: a time-course analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 536-571.
23. McQueen, J.M., Cutler, A., Briscoe, T., & Norris, D.G. (1995). Models of continuous speech recognition and the contents of the vocabulary. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 309-331.
24. McQueen, J.M., Norris, D.G., & Cutler, A. (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 621-638.
25. Morton, J. (1970). A functional model for memory. In D.A. Norman (Ed.), Models for human memory (pp. 203-254). New York: Academic Press.
26. Norris, D.G. (1986). Word recognition: context effects without priming. Cognition, 22, 93-136.
27. Norris, D.G. (1994). Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
28. Norris, D.G., McOueen, J.M., and Cutler, A. (1995). Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1209-1228.
29. Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P.J., & Swinney, D.A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 786-803.
30. Pearlmutter, N., & MacDonald, M.C. (1992). Plausibility effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Proceedings of the 14th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 498-503). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358-374.
32. Spivey-Knowlton, M.J., & Sedivy, J.C. (1995). Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition, 55, 227-267.
33. Stowe, L. (1989). Thematic structures and sentence comprehension. In G.N. Carlson & M.K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 319-357). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
34. Swinney, D.A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-660.
35. Tanenhaus, M.K., Leiman, J., & Seidenberg, M. (1979). Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words in syntactic contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 426-441.
36. Tanenhaus, M.K., & Trueswell, J. (1994). Sentence comprehension. In J. Miller and P. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Speech, language and cognition (pp. 217-262). San Diego: Academic Press.
37. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J.L. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 597-632.
38. Trueswell, J.C., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Garnsey, S.M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.