An application of the a'WOT analysis for the management of cultural heritage assets: The case of the historical farmhouses in the aglie castle (Turin)

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2020, Pages

  Bottero, Marta ^a   D'Alpaos, Chiara ^b   Marello, Alessia ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

A'wot analysis; Cultural heritage; Management strategy; Multicriteria decision aid; Valorization

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL HERITAGE; DECISION MAKING; INVESTMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; RANKING; STAKEHOLDER; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TRADE-OFF; UNESCO; WORLD HERITAGE SITE;

AUVERGNE-RHONE-ALPES; FRANCE; ITALY; PIEDMONT [ITALY]; SAVOIE; TORINO [PIEDMONT]; TURIN;

EID: 85081222964     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su12031071     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Ball, R. Developers, regeneration and sustainability issues in the reuse of vacant industrial buildings. Build. Res. Inf. 1999, 27, 140-148. [CrossRef]
2. Langston, C.; Wong, F.K.; Hui, E.C.; Shen, L.-Y. Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Build. Environ. 2008, 43, 1709-1718. [CrossRef]
3. Bullen, P.A.; Love, P.E. Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Struct. Surv. 2011, 29, 411-421. [CrossRef]
4. Plevoets, B.; Van Cleempoel, K. Adaptive reuse as a strategy towards conservation of cul-tural heritage: A literature review. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 2011, 118, 155-164.
5. Misirlisoy, D.; Günce, K. Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2016, 26, 91-98. [CrossRef]
6. Dolores, L.; Macchiaroli, M.; De Mare, G. Sponsorship for the Sustainability of Historical-Architectural Heritage: Application of a Model's Original Test Finalized to Maximize the Profitability of Private Investors. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1750. [CrossRef]
7. Forte, C.; De Rossi, B. Principi di Economia ed Estimo; Etas: Milano, Italy, 1974.
8. Mazzanti, M. Cultural heritage as multi-dimensional, multi-value and multi-attribute economic good: Toward a new framework for economic analysis and valuation. J. Socio-Economic. 2002, 31, 529-558. [CrossRef]
9. Pearce, D.W.; Turner, R.K. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1990.
10. Louviere, J.J.; Hensher, D.A.; Swaitt, J.D. Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Application; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000.
11. Voke, M.; Fairley, I.; Willis, M.; Masters, I. Economic evaluation of the recreational value of the coastal environment in a marine renewables deployment area. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 78, 77-87. [CrossRef]
12. Bedate, A.; Herrero, L.C.; Sanz, J. Angel Economic valuation of the cultural heritage: Application to four case studies in Spain. J. Cult. Heritage 2004, 5, 101-111. [CrossRef]
13. Bâez, A.; Herrero, L.C.; Prieto, L.C.H. Using contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis to design a policy for restoring cultural heritage. J. Cult. Heritage 2012, 13, 235-245. [CrossRef]
14. Wright, W.C.; Eppink, F.V. Drivers of heritage value: A meta-analysis of monetary valuation studies of cultural heritage. Ecol. Econ. 2016, 130, 277-284. [CrossRef]
15. Kee, T. Sustainable adaptive reuse-economic impact of cultural heritage. J. Cult. Heritage Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 9, 165-183. [CrossRef]
16. Roy, B.; Bouyssou, D. Aide Multicritere a la Decision: Methodes et Cas; Economica: Paris, France, 1993.
17. Ferretti, V.; Bottero, M.; Mondini, G. Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings. J. Cult. Heritage 2014, 15, 644-655. [CrossRef]
18. Nesticô, A.; Morano, P.; Sica, F. A model to support the public administration decisions for the investments selection on historic buildings. J. Cult. Heritage 2018, 33, 201-207. [CrossRef]
19. Bottero, M.; D'Alpaos, C.; Oppio, A. Multicriteria Evaluation of Urban Regeneration Processes: An Application of PROMETHEE Method in Northern Italy. Adv. Oper. Res. 2018, 2018, 1-12. [CrossRef]
20. Bottero, M.; D'Alpaos, C.; Oppio, A. Ranking of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Abandoned Industrial Heritage in Vulnerable Contexts: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach. Sustainability 2019, 11, 785. [CrossRef]
21. Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1980.
22. Wheelen, T.L.; Hunger, J.D. Strategic Management and Business Policy, 5th ed.; Addison Wesley: Reading, MA, USA, 1995.
23. Hill, T.; Westbrook, R. SWOT analysis: It's Time for a Product Recall. Long Range Plan. 1997, 30, 46-52. [CrossRef]
24. Kajanus, M. A model for creating innovative strategies for an enterprise and its application to a rural enterprise. Manag. Decis. 2000, 38, 711-722. [CrossRef]
25. Kajanus, M.; Kangas, J.; Kurttila, M. The use of value focused thinking and the A'WOT hybrid method in tourism management. Tour. Manag. 2004, 25, 499-506. [CrossRef]
26. Falcone, P.M.; Tani, A.; Tartiu, V.E.; Imbriani, C. Towards a sustainable forest-based bioeconomy in Italy: Findings from a SWOT analysis. For. Policy Econ. 2020, 110, 101910. [CrossRef]
27. Kamran, M.; Fazal, M.R.; Mudassar, M. Towards empowerment of the renewable energy sector in Pakistan for sustainable energy evolution: SWOT analysis. Renew. Energy 2020, 146, 543-558. [CrossRef]
28. Kurttila, M.; Pesonen, M.; Kangas, J.; Kajanus, M. Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis-a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. For. Policy Econ. 2000, 1, 41-52. [CrossRef]
29. Pesonen, M.; Kurttila, M.; Kangas, J.; Kajanus, M.; Heinonen, P. Assessing the priorities using A'WOT among resource management strategies at the Finnish Forest and Park Service. For. Sci. 2001, 47, 534-541.
30. Kangas, J.; Kangas, A.; Leskinen, P.; Pykäläinen, J. MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland: Applications and experiences. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 2001, 10, 257-271. [CrossRef]
31. Saaty, T.L. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 1st ed.; RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2000.
32. Kajanus, M.; Leskinen, P.; Kurttila, M.; Kangas, J. Making use of MCDS methods in SWOT analysis-Lessons learnt in strategic natural resources management. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 20, 1-9. [CrossRef]
33. Vacik, H.; Kurttila, M.; Hujala, T.; Khadka, C.; Haara, A.; Pykäläinen, J.; Honkakoski, P.; Wolfslehner, B.; Tikkanen, J. Evaluating collaborative planning methods supporting programme-based planning in natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 144, 304-315. [CrossRef]
34. Moharramnejad, N.; Rahnamai, M.-T.; Dorbeiki, M. Application of A'WOT Method in Strategic Management of Sustainable Tourism in a National Park. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2017, 16, 471-480.
35. Gallego-Ayala, J.; Juizo, D. Performance evaluation of River Basin Organizations to implement integrated water resources management using composite indexes. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2012, 50, 205-216. [CrossRef]
36. Podimata, M.V.; Yannopoulos, P.C. Evaluating challenges and priorities of a trans-regional river basin in Greece by using a hybrid SWOT scheme and a stakeholders' competency overview. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 2013, 11, 93-110. [CrossRef]
37. Gallego-Ayala, J.; Juizo, D. Integrating Stakeholders' Preferences into Water Resources Management Planning in the Incomati River Basin. Water Resour. Manag. 2014, 28, 527-540. [CrossRef]
38. Chitsaz, N.; Azarnivand, A. Water Scarcity Management in Arid Regions Based on an Extended Multiple Criteria Technique. Water Resour. Res. 2017, 31, 233-250. [CrossRef]
39. Kisi, N. A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A'WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey. Sustainability 2019, 11, 964. [CrossRef]
40. Canto-Perello, J.; Curiel-Esparza, J.; Calvo, V. Strategic decision support system for utility tunnel's planning applying A'WOT method. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2016, 55, 146-152. [CrossRef]
41. Pellegrino, D.; Schirpke, U.; Marino, D. How to support the effective management of Natura 2000 sites? J. Environ. Plann. Man. 2017, 60, 383-398. [CrossRef]
42. Kittiyankajon, M.; Chetchotsak, D.; Ruangchoengchum, P. Group decision technique for multiple criteria evaluation problems: The preferential difference and rank approach through data envelopment analysis. IJBIR 2019, 18, 410-427. [CrossRef]
43. Bottero, M.; Comino, E.; Dell'Anna, F.; Dominici, L.; Rosso, M. Strategic Assessment and Economic Evaluation: The Case Study of Yanzhou Island (China). Sustainability 2019, 11, 1076. [CrossRef]
44. Roberti, F.; Oberegger, U.F.; Lucchi, E.; Gasparella, A. Energy retrofit and conservation of built heritage using multi-objective optimization: Demonstration on a medieval building. Build. Simul. 2015, 2, 189-197.
45. Roberti, F.; Oberegger, U.F.; Lucchi, E.; Troi, A. Energy retrofit and conservation of a historic building using multi-objective optimization and an analytic hierarchy process. Energy Build. 2017, 138, 1-10. [CrossRef]
46. Turskis, Z.; Morkunaite, Z.; Kutut, V. A hybrid multiple criteria evaluation method of ranking of cultural heritage structures for renovation projects. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 2017, 21, 318-329. [CrossRef]
47. Bozic, S.; Vujicic, M.; Kennell, J.; Besermenji, S.; Solarevic, M. Sun, sea and shrines: Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to assess the attractiveness of six cultural heritage sites in Phuket: Thailand. Geogr. Pannonica 2018, 22, 121-138. [CrossRef]
48. Keyvanfar, A.; Shafaghat, A.; Mohamad, S.; Abdullahi, M.; Ahmad, H.; Derus, N.M.; Khorami, M. A Sustainable Historic Waterfront Revitalization Decision Support Tool for Attracting Tourists. Sustainability 2018, 10, 215. [CrossRef]
49. Liu, F.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, Y. An approach to assess the value of industrial heritage based on Dempster-Shafer theory. J. Cult. Heritage 2018, 32, 210-220. [CrossRef]
50. Ma, H.; Li, S.; Chan, C.-S. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based assessment of the value of non-World Heritage Tulou: A case study of Pinghe County, Fujian Province. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2018, 26, 67-77. [CrossRef]
51. Ribera, F.; Nesticô, A.; Cucco, P.; Maselli, G. A multicriteria approach to identify the Highest and Best Use for historical buildings. J. Cult. Heritage 2019, in press. [CrossRef]
52. Iliopoulou-Georgudaki, J.; Theodoropoulos, C.; Konstantinopoulos, P.; Georgoudaki, E. Sustainable tourism development including the enhancement of cultural heritage in the city of Nafpaktos-Western Greece. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World 2017, 24, 224-235. [CrossRef]
53. Guzman, P.; Roders, A.P.; Colenbrander, B. Impacts of Common Urban Development Factors on Cultural Conservation in World Heritage Cities: An Indicators-Based Analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 853. [CrossRef]
54. Dastgerdi, A.S.; De Luca, G. The Riddles of Historic Urban Quarters Inscription on the Unesco World Heritage List. Archnet-IJAR: Int. J. Arch Res. 2018, 12, 152-163. [CrossRef]
55. Ali, A.G.M.; Elsheikha, A.A.A.; Elbanna, E.M.; Peinado, F.J.M. An approach to conservation and management of Farasan Islands' Heritage sites, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 2018, 9, 245-256.
56. Lak, A.; Gheitasi, M.; Timothy, D.J. Urban regeneration through heritage tourism: Cultural policies and strategic management. J. Tour. Cult. Chang. 2019, in press. [CrossRef]
57. Vinardi, M.G. Scavalcô lo steccato e vide che la natura era tutto un giardino. In Il risveglio del giardino: Dall'hortus al paesaggio, studi, esperienze, confronti; Cornaglia, P., Giusti, M.A., Eds.; Pacini Fazzi: Lucca, Italy, 2015; p. 83.
58. Antoniono, R. Il castello d'Agliè: Una residenza aulica e un territorio. Master's Thesis, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy, 1996; p. 149.
59. Comoli, V.; Vanelli, A. Le residenze sabaude: Dizionario dei personaggi; Roggero, C., Poletto, S., Eds.; Regione Piemonte: Accolade, Torino, 2008; p. 44.
60. Colla, G.B. Tipo regolare del Parco, Castello, Giardini e Valle e limiti in coerenza di codesto Castello spettante a S.A.R. il Sig. Duca del Chiablese, Agliè, li 25 febbraio 1975, Paper drawing, Archivio Antico, Agliè.
61. Banzato, D.; Canesi, R.; D'Alpaos, C. Biogas and biomethane technologies: An AHP model to support the policy maker in incentive design in Italy. In Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. SSPCR 2017; Green Energy and Technology; Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Laconte, P., Costa, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 319-331. [CrossRef]
62. D'Alpaos, C.; Bragolusi, P. Multicriteria prioritization of policy instruments in buildings energy retrofit. Valori e Valutazioni 2018, 21, 15-25.
63. D'Alpaos, C.; Bragolusi, P. Prioritization of Energy Retrofit Strategies in Public Housing: An AHP Model. In New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018; Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 101; Calabrô, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 534-541. [CrossRef]
64. Groselj, P.; Stirn, L.Z. Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 223, 417-420. [CrossRef]
65. Dong, Q.; Saaty, T.L. An analytic hierarchy process model of group consensus. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 2014, 23, 362-374. [CrossRef]
66. Krejci, J.; Stoklasa, J. Aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process: Why weighted geometric mean should be used instead of weighted arithmetic mean. Expert Syst. Appl. 2018, 114, 97-106. [CrossRef]
67. Della Spina, L. Scenarios for a Sustainable Valorisation ofCultural Landscape as Driver ofLocal Development In New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018; Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 101; Calabrô, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 113-122. [CrossRef]
68. Della Spina, L. Historical Cultural Heritage: Decision Making Process and Reuse Scenarios for the Enhancement of Historic Buildings. Development. In New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018; Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 101; Calabrô, F., Della Spina, L., Bevilacqua, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 442-453. [CrossRef]
69. Bottero, M.; Caprioli, C.; Cotella, G.; Santangelo, M. Sustainable Cities: A Reflection on Potentialities and Limits based on Existing Eco-Districts in Europe. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5794. [CrossRef]