Ranking of adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2019, Pages

  Bottero, Marta ^a   D'Alpaos, Chiara ^b   Oppio, Alessandra ^c  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adaptive reuse; Cultural Heritage; Multicriteria Decision Aid; PROMETHEE; Strategic assessment

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; ASSESSMENT METHOD; CULTURAL HERITAGE; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; STRATEGIC APPROACH; TRADE-OFF; VULNERABILITY;

ITALY;

EID: 85061104492     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su11030785     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Fusco Girard, L.; Gravagnuolo, A. Circular economy and cultural heritage/landscape regeneration. Circular business, financing and governance models for a competitive Europe. BDC Bollettino Del Centro Calza Bini 2017, 17, 35-52
2. Latham, D. Creative Re-Use of Buildings; Donhead Publishing: Shaftesbury, UK, 2000; Volume II
3. Wilkinson, S.J.; Reed, R.; James, K. Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia. Struct. Surv. 2009, 27, 46-61
4. Cooper, I. Post-occupancy evaluation-where are you? Build. Res. Inf. 2001, 29, 158-163
5. Bullen, P.A.; Love, E. Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Struct. Surv. 2011, 29, 411-421
6. Ball, R. Developers, regeneration and sustainability issues in the reuse of vacant buildings. Build. Res. Inf. 1999, 27, 140-148
7. Plevoets, B.; Van Cleempoel, K. Adaptive reuse as a strategy towards conservation of cul-tural heritage: A literature review. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 2011, 118, 155-164
8. Scarrocchia, S. Alois Riegl. Teoria e Prassi Della Conservazione dei Monumenti. Antologia di Scritti, Discorsi, Rapporti, 1898-1905; Clueb: Bologna, Italy, 1995
9. Forte, C. Valore di Scambio e Valore D'uso Sociale dei Beni Culturali Immobiliari; Arte Tipografica: Napoli, Italy, 1977
10. Fusco Girard, L. Risorse Architettoniche e Culturali: Valutazione e Strategie di Conservazione; FrancoAngeli: Milano, Italy, 1987
11. Pearce, D.W.; Turner, R.K. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1990
12. European Commission. Towards an Integrated Approach to Cultural Heritage for Europe. 2014. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/culture/library/publications/2014-heritage-communication_en.pdf (accessed on 28 December 2018)
13. Avrami, E.; Mason, M.R.; De La Torre, M. Values and Heritage Conservation: Research Report; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2000
14. Klamer, A. The values of cultural heritage. In Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage; Rizzo, I., Mignosa, A., Eds.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2013
15. Elsorady, D. The economic value of heritage properties in Alexandria, Egypt. J. Cult. Herit. 2014, 15, 511-521
16. Misirlisoy, D.; Gunçe, K. Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2016, 26, 91-98
17. Oppio, A.; Bottero, M. Conflicting values in designing adaptive reuse for cultural heritage. A case study of social multicriteria evaluation. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2017, 10406, 607-623
18. Oppio, A.; Bottero, M.; Ferretti, V. Designing adaptive reuse strategies for cultural heritage with choice experiments. Green Energy Technol. 2017, 303-315
19. Munda, G. Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment. Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics; Physica-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 1995
20. Munda, G. Social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE):Methodological foundations and operational consequences. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 158, 662-677
21. Damart, S.; Roy, B. The uses of cost benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France. Transp. Policy 2009, 16, 200-212
22. Bottero, M. L'Analisi Multicriteri. Intervista a Bernard Roy. Valori Valutazioni 2014, 12, 7-24
23. Corrente, S.; Figueira, J.R.; Greco, S. The SMAA-PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2014, 239, 514-522
24. Bottero, M.; D'Alpaos, C.; Oppio, A. Multicriteria evaluation of urban regeneration processes: An application of PROMETHEE method in northern Italy. Adv. Oper. Res. 2018, 9276075, 1-12
25. Brans, J.P. L'ingénierie de la décision; Elaboration d'instruments d'aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. In L'aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d'Avenir; Nadeau, R., Landry, M., Eds.; Presses de l'Université Laval: Québec, Canada, 1982; pp. 183-213
26. Brans, J.; Vincke, P. A preference ranking organization method (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision making). Manag. Sci. 1985, 31, 647-656
27. Brans, J.P.; Vincke, P.; Mareschal, B. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1986, 24, 228-238
28. Brans, J.P.; Mareschal, B. PROMETHEE V-MCDM problems with segmentation constraints. INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 1992, 30, 85-96
29. Brans, J.P.; Mareschal, B. The PROMETHEE VI procedure. How to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. J. Decis. Syst. 1995, 4, 213-223
30. Greco, S.; Kadzinski, M.; Mousseau, V.; Slowinski, R. ELECTREGKMS: Robust ordinal regression for outranking methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011, 214, 118-135
31. Kadzinski, M.; Greco, S.; Slowinski, R. Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression. Omega 2012, 40, 488-501
32. Brans, J.P.; De Smet, Y. PROMETHEE methods. Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 2016, 233, 187-219
33. Roy, B.; Bouyssou, D. Aide Multicritere a la Decision: Methodes et Cas; Economica: Paris, France, 1993
34. Brans, J.P.; Mareschal, B. PROMETHEE methods. In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys; Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 163-196
35. Brans, J.P.; Mareschal, B.; Vincke, P. PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multi-criteria analysis. In Operational Research '84; Brans, J.P., Ed.; North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984; pp. 477-490
36. Behzadian, M.; Kazemzadeh, R.B.; Albadvi, A.; Aghdasi, M. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 200, 198-215
37. Arcidiacono, S.G.; Corrente, S.; Greco, S. GAIA-SMAA-PROMETHEE for a hierarchy of interacting criteria. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2018, 270, 606-624
38. Govindan, K.; Kadzinski, M.; Sivakumar, R. Application of a novel PROMETHEE-based method for construction of a group compromise ranking to prioritization of green suppliers in food supply chain. Omega 2017, 71, 129-145
39. Bagherikahvarin, M.; DeSmet, Y. Determining new possible weight values in PROMETHEE: A procedure based on data envelopment analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2017, 68, 484-495
40. Bagherikahvarin, M.; De Smet, Y. A ranking method based on DEA and PROMETHEE II (a rank based on DEA & PR.II). Measurement 2016, 89, 333-340
41. Kilic, H.; Zaim, S.; Delen, D. Selecting "The Best" ERP system for SMEs using a combination of ANP and PROMETHEE methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42, 2343-2352
42. Chen, Y.H.; Wang, T.C.; Wu, C.Y. Strategic decisions using the fuzzy PROMETHEE for IS outsourcing. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 13216-13222
43. Taha, Z.; Rostam, S. A hybrid fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE decision support system for machine tool selection in flexible manufacturing cell. J. Intell. Manuf. 2012, 23, 2137-2149
44. Doan, N.A.V.; De Smet, Y. An alternative weight sensitivity analysis for PROMETHEE II rankings. Omega 2018, 80, 166-174
45. Kadzinski, M.; Ciomek, K. Integrated framework for preference modeling and robustness analysis for outranking-based multiple criteria sorting with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Inf. Sci. 2016, 352, 167-187
46. Lopes, A.P.F.; Muñoz, M.M.; Alarcón-Urbistondo, P. Regional tourism competitiveness using the PROMETHEE approach. Ann. Tour. Res. 2018, 73, 1-13
47. Butowski, L. An integrated AHP and PROMETHEE approach to the evaluation of the attractiveness of European maritime areas for sailing tourism. Morav. Geogr. Rep. 2018, 26, 135-148
48. Roozbahani, A.; Zahraie, B.; Tabesh, M. PROMETHEE with Precedence Order in the Criteria (PPOC) as a New Group Decision Making Aid: An Application in Urban Water Supply Management. Water Resour. Manag. 2012, 26, 3581-3599
49. Christian, A.V.; Zhang, Y.; Salifou, C. Application of PROMETHEE-GAIA Method in the Entry Mode Selection Process in International Market Expansion. Open J. Bus. Manag. 2016, 4, 238-250
50. Veličkovska, I.; Maja Stanujkić, M. The Use of AHP-PROMETHEE Method in Environmental Management-National Park Djerdap. Eng. Manag. 2018, 4, 65-77
51. Mavrotas, G.; Ziomas, I.C.; Diakouaki, D. A Combined MOIP-MCDA Approach to Building and Screening Atmospheric Pollution Control Strategies in Urban Regions. Environ. Manag. 2006, 38, 149-160
52. Juan, Y.-K.; Roper, K.O.; Castro-Lacouture, D.; Kim, J.H. Optimal decision making on urban renewal projects. Manag. Decis. 2010, 48, 207-224
53. Bottero, M.; Baudino, I.; Antonelli, P. Strategic assessment and multicriteria analysis: An application of the PROMETHEE method for the analysis of urban regeneration scenarios. Geoingegneria Ambientale Mineraria 2016, 148, 5-16
54. Dirutigliano, D.; Delmastro, C.; Torabi Moghadam, S. Energy efficient urban districts: A multi-criteria application for selecting retrofit actions. Int. J. Heat Technol. 2017, 35, S49-S57
55. Wagner, M. A Research Proposal on the Parametric City Governance. In Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions-Results of SSPCR 2015; Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Stephens, R., Elisei, P., Eds.; Green and Energy Technology; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; pp. 205-219
56. Fusco Girard, L.; De Toro, P. Integrated spatial assessment: A multicriteria approach to sustainable development of cultural and environmental heritage in San Marco dei Cavoti, Italy. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 15, 281-299
57. Oppio, A.; Bottero, M.; Ferretti, V.; Fratesi, U.; Ponzini, D.; Pracchi, V. Giving space to multicriteria analysis for complex cultural heritage systems: The case of the castles in Valle D'Aosta Region, Italy. J. Cult. Herit. 2015, 16, 779-789
58. Ferretti, V.; Comino, E. An integrated framework to assess complex cultural and natural heritage systems with MultiAttribute Value Theory. J. Cult. Herit. 2015, 16, 688-697
59. Morkunaite, Z.; Podvezko, V.; Kutut, V. Selection Criteria For Evaluating Contractors Of Cultural Heritage Objects. Procedia Eng. 2017, 208, 90-97
60. Nesticò, A.; Morano, P.; Sica, F. A model to support the public administration decisions for the investments selection on historic buildings. J. Cult. Herit. 2018, 33, 201-207
61. Seddiki, M.; Anouche, K.; Bennadji, A. An integrated Delphi-FAHP-PROMETHEE for the thermal renovation of masonry buildings in Algeria. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Heritage and Sustainable Development (Heritage 2016); Amoeda, R., Lira, S., Pinheiro, C., Eds.; Green Line Institute: Barcelos, Portugal, 2016; pp. 171-180
62. Bottero, M.; Dell'Anna, F.; Nappo, M. Evaluating tangible and intangible aspects of cultural heritage: An application of the promethee method for the reuse project of the Ceva-Ormea railway. Green Energy Technol. 2018, 285-295
63. Perlo, F. Il patrimonio industriale in Alta Val Tanaro, Valle Mongia e Cebano: Conoscenza, catalogazione e valutazione multicriteriale di scenario di riuso dei siti dismessi, Specailization thesis, Architectural and Landscape Heritage post-graduated specialization school, Polytechnic University of Turin (supervisiors: Laura Guardamagna and Marta Bottero). 2016. Available online: http://www.scuolabap.polito.it/content/ download/437/1904/version/1/file/TESI+2015-2017.pdf (accessed on 2 July 2018)
64. Roy, B. Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996
65. Dias, L.C.; Antunes, C.H.; Dantas, G.; de Castro, N.; Zamboni, L. A multi-criteria approach to sort and rank policies based on Delphi qualitative assessments and ELECTRE TRI: The case of smart grids in Brazil. Omega 2018, 76, 100-111
66. D'Alpaos, C.; Bragolusi, P. Multicriteria Prioritization of Policy Instruments in Buildings Energy Retrofit. Valori Valutazioni 2018, 21, 15-26
67. Simos, J. L'evaluation Environnementale: Un Processus Cognitif Neegociee. Ph.D. Thesis, DGF-EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1990
68. Simos, J. Evaluer L'impact sur L'environnement: Une Approche originale par L'analyse Multicritère et la Négociation; Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes: Lausanne, Switzerland, 1990
69. Figueira, J.; Roy, B. Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 139, 317-326
70. Siskos, E.; Tsotsolas, N. Elicitation of criteria importance weights through the Simos method: A robustness concern. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2015, 246, 543-553
71. Canesi, R.; D'Alpaos, C.; Marella, M. Forced sale values vs. Market values in Italy. J. Real Estate Lit. 2016, 24, 377-401
72. Canesi, R.; D'Alpaos, C.; Marella, G. Foreclosed homes market in Italy: Bases of value. Int. J. Hous. Sci. Appl. 2016, 40, 201-209
73. Bertolini, M.; D'Alpaos, C.; Moretto, M. Do Smart Grids boost investments in domestic PV plants? Evidence from the Italian electricity market. Energy 2018, 149, 890-902
74. Dolores, L.; Macchiaroli, M.; De Mare, G. Sponsorship for the sustainability of historical-architectural heritage: Application of a model's original test finalized to maximize the profitability of private investors. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1750
75. Augusto, M.; Lisboa, J.; Yasin, M.; Figueira, J.R. Benchmarking in a multiple criteria performance context: An application and a conceptual framework. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 184, 244-254
76. Berta, M.; Bottero, M.; Ferretti, V. A mixed methods approach for the integration of urban design and economic evaluation: Industrial heritage and urban regeneration in China. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2018, 45, 208-232
77. Del Giudice, V.D.; De Paola, P.; Torrieri, F. An integrated choice model for the evaluation of urban sustainable renewal scenarios. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 1030, 2399-2406
78. Oppio, A.; Bottero, M. A strategic management based on multicriteria decision analysis: An application for the Alpine regions. Int. J. Multicrit. Decis. Mak. 2018, 7, 236-262
79. Ortiz, M.S.O.; Geneletti, D. Assessing mismatches in the provision of urban ecosystem services to support spatial planning: A case study on recreation and food supply in Havana, Cuba. Sustainability 2018, 10