Using contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis to design a policy for restoring cultural heritage

Journal of Cultural Heritage

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 235-245

  Báez, Andrea ^a   Herrero, Luis César ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chile; Contingent valuation; Cost benefit analysis; Cultural economics; Cultural policy; Economics of heritage

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865712781     PISSN: 12962074     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2010.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hutter M., Rizzo I. (Eds.) Economics perspectives on cultural heritage 1997, MacMillan Press Ltd, Basingstoke.
2. Cuccia T., Signorello G. A contingent valuation study of willingness to pay for heritage visits: case study of Noto. The economics of heritage: a study in the political economy of culture in Sicily, Chapter 10 2002, 147-163. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. I. Rizzo, R. Towse (Eds.).
3. Throsby D. Cultural capital. Journal of Cultural Economics 2001, 23:3-12.
4. Tuan T.H., Navrud S. Valuing cultural heritage in developing countries: comparing and pooling contingent valuation and choice modelling estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics 2007, 38(1):51-69.
5. Tuan T.H., Navrud S. Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2008, 9(3):326-337.
6. Guarda G. Nueva Historia de Valdivia 2001, Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.
7. Mitchell R.C., Carson R. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method 1989, Resources for the Future, Washington.
8. R.K. Davis. The value of outdoor recreation: an economic study of the Maine Woods. Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University, 1963.
9. Hanemann W., Loomis J., Kaninnen B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1991, 73:1255-1263.
10. Cameron T.A., Quiggin J. Estimation using contingent valuation data from a dichotomous choice with follow-up questionnaire. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1994, 27:218-234.
11. Sanz J.A., Herrero L.C., Bedate A. Contingent valuation and semiparametric methods: a case study of the national museum of sculpture in Valladolid, Spain. Journal of Cultural Economics 2003, 27(3-4):241-257.
12. Ayer M., Brunk H., Swing G., Reid W.T.Y., Silverman E. An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1955, 26:641-647.
13. B. Turnbull. The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 38 (1976) 290-295.
14. M.Y. An, R.A. Ayala. A simple algorithm for nonparametric estimation of distribution functions with arbitrarily grouped data, Working Paper 9602, Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham, 1996.
15. Diamond P.A., Hausman J.A. Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number?. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1994, 8(4):45-64.
16. R.T. Carson. Contingent valuation: a user's guide. Discussion Paper 99-26, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, 1999.
17. Noonan D. Contingent valuation and culture resources: a meta-analytic review of literature. Journal of Cultural Economics 2003, 27:159-176.
18. T. Cuccia. Contingent valuation, in: R. Towse (Ed.), A handbook of cultural economics, Chapter 14, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003, pp. 119-131.
19. Boardman A., Greenberg D., Vining A., Weimer D. Cost-benefit analysis. Concepts and practice 2001, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Segunda Edición.
20. Papandrea F. Regulation and cost-benefit analysis. Handbook of research on cost-benefit analysis, Chapter 8. Part II 2009, 185-225. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. R. Brent (Ed.).
21. Smith V.K. Nonuse vales in benefit analysis. Southern Economic Journal 1987, 54(1):19-26.
22. Nash C., Laird J. Cost-benefit analysis in transport: recent developments in rail project appraisal in Britain. Handbook of research on cost-benefit analysis, Chapter 5. Part II 2009, 110-142. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. R. Brent (Ed.).
23. CEPAL. Metodología general de identificación, preparación y evaluación de proyectos de inversión pública. Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Planificación Económica y Social, área de Proyectos y Programación de Inversiones, Santiago de Chile, 2005.
24. SERNATUR. Estadísticas de turismo-Valdivia, 2006. http://www.sernatur.cl/.
25. Banco Central de Chile. Base de datos económicos. 2006. http://www.si2.bcentral.cl/.