Evaluating collaborative planning methods supporting programme-based planning in natural resource management

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 144, Issue , 2014, Pages 304-315

  Vacik, Harald ^a   Kurttila, Mikko ^b   Hujala, Teppo ^b   Khadka, Chiranjeewee ^a,c   Haara, Arto ^b,d   Pykäläinen, Jouni ^e   Honkakoski, Päivi ^d   Wolfslehner, Bernhard ^a,f   Tikkanen, Jukka ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c INSTITUTE OF LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^d OULU UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Finland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^f European Forest Institute Central East European Regional Office (EFICEEC)   (Austria)

Author keywords

Group decision making; Natural resource management; Participatory planning; Problem identification; Problem modelling; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FORESTRY; LAND USE; PROBLEM SOLVING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

COLLABORATIVE PLANNING; FUNDINGS; GROUP DECISION MAKING; MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS; PARTICIPATORY PLANNING; PLANNING METHOD; PLANNING PROCESS; PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION; PROBLEM MODELS; PROBLEM-SOLVING;

NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LAND USE CHANGE; NATURAL RESOURCE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CREATIVITY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROGRAMME BASED PLANNING OF NATURAL RESOURCES; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; COOPERATION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; PLANNING TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84903480277     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.029     Document Type: Review

References (93)

1. Alford P. Open Space - a Collaborative Process for Facilitating Tourism IT Partnerships 2008, 430-440. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism.
2. Ansell C., Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J.Public Adm. Res. Theory 2008, 18(4):543-571.
3. Armitage D.R., Plummer R., Berkes F., Arthur R.I., Charles A.T., Davidson-Hunt I.J., Diduck A.P., Doubleday N.C., Johnson D.S., Marschke M., McConney P., Pinkerton E.W., Wollenberg E.K. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:95-102.
4. Belton V., Stewart T.J. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: an Integrated Approach 2002, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 400 pp.
5. Brewer G.D. Methods for synthesis: policy exercises. Sustainable development of the biosphere. IIASA 1986, 455-473. Cambridge University Press, Laxenburg, Austria. W.C. Clark, R.E. Munn (Eds.).
6. Brown J. The World Café: Living Knowledge through Conversations that Matter 2001, Doctoral Dissertation, Mill Valley.
7. Carmona G., Varela-Ortega Consuelo, Bromley J. Participatory modelling to support decision making in water management under uncertainty: two comparative case studies in the Guadiana river basin, Spain. J.Environ. Manag. 2013, 128:400-412.
8. Checkland P.B. Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2000, 17:11-58.
9. Churchman C.W. Wicked problems. Manag. Sci. 1967, 14:141-142.
10. Crosby N. Citizens' juries: one solution for difficult environmental questions. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. 1995, 157-174. Kluwer, Dordrecht. O. Renn, T. Webler, P. Wiedemann (Eds.).
11. Daniels S.E., Lawrence R.L., Alig R.J. Decision-making and ecosystem-based management: applying the Vroom-Yetton model to public participation strategy. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 1996, 16(1):13-30.
12. Delbecq A.L., VandeVen A.H. Agroup process model for problem identification and program planning. J.Appl. Behav. Sci. 1971, VII(July/August, 1971):466-491.
13. Dubois O. Capacity to Manage Role Changes in Forestry: Introducing the '4Rs' Framework 1998, IIED, London.
14. Eden C. On the nature of cognitive maps. J.Manag. Stud. 1992, 29(3):261-265.
15. Ehtamo H., Kettunen E., Hämäläinen R.P. Searching for joint gains in multi-party negotiations. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 2001, 130(1):54-69.
16. European Commission Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth 2010, Communication from the commission. Brussels, 3.3.2010. COM(2010) 2020 final.
17. Ferreira L., Hitchcock D.B. A comparison of hierarchical methods for clustering functional data. Comm. Stat. Simulat. Comput. 2009, 38:1925-1949. 10.1080/03610910903168603.
18. Fisher R., Prabhu R., McDougall C. Adaptive Collaborative Management of Community Forests in Asia Experiences from Nepal, Indonesia and the Philippines 2007, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) Research Report, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
19. Fraser N.M., Hauge J.W. Multicriteria approval: application of approval voting concepts to MCDM problems. J.Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 1998, 7:263-272.
20. National Forest Programmes in a European Context 2002, EFI Proceedings. No. 44. O. Gislerud, I. Neven (Eds.).
21. Grimble R., Man-Kwun Chan M.-K. Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries: some practical guidelines for making management more participatory and effective. Nat. Resour. Forum 1995, 19(2):113-124.
22. Hare M., Letcer R.A., Jakeman A.J. Participatory modelling in natural resources management: a comparison of four case studies. Integr. Assess. 2003, 4(2):62-72.
23. Healey P. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies 1997, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, 338 p.
24. Herman M., Jain S. Open Space Technology: Inviting Leadership Practice 2006, http://www.michaelherman.com/publications/inviting_leadership.pdf, third ed.
25. Hiltunen V., Kurttila M., Leskinen P., Pasanen K., Pykäläinen J. Mesta: an internet-based decision-support application for participatory strategic-level natural resource planning. For. Pol. Econ. 2009, 11(1):1-9.
26. The Change Handbook: Group Methods for Shaping the Future 1999, Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc., San Francisco. P. Holman, T. Devane (Eds.).
27. Hytönen L.A., Leskinen P., Store R. Aspatial approach to participatory planning in forestry decision making. Scand. J. For. Res. 2002, 17(1):62-71.
28. Innes J.E. Planning theory's emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice. J.Plan. Educ. Res. 1995, 14(3):183-189.
29. Kajanus M., Leskinen P., Kurttila M., Kangas J. Making use of MCDS methods in SWOT analysis-lessons learnt in strategic natural resources management. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 20:1-9.
30. Kangas A., Laukkanen S., Kangas J. Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management-a review. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 9:77-92.
31. Kangas A., Saarinen N., Saarikoski H., Leskinen L.A., Hujala T., Tikkanen J. Stakeholder perspectives about proper participation for regional forest programmes in Finland. For. Policy Econ. 2010, 12:213-222.
32. Kacprzyk J., Fedrizzi M., Nurmi H. Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1992, 49:21-31.
33. Kautonen M. Balancing competitiveness and cohesion in regional innovation policy: the case of Finland. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2012, 20(12):1925-1943.
34. Khadka C., Hujala T., Wolfslehner B., Vacik H. Problem structuring in participatory forest planning. For. Policy Econ. 2013, 26:1-11.
35. Kingston R., Carver S., Evans A., Turton I. Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers. Environ. Urban Syst. 2000, 24(2):109-125.
36. Kingston R. Web-based PPGIS in the United Kingdom. Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems 2002, 101-112. W.J. Craig, T.M. Harris, D. Weiner (Eds.).
37. Kotler P. Marketing Management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and Control 1988, Prentice-Hall International Edition. sixth ed.
38. Krueger R.A. Focus Groups: a Practical guide for Applied Research 1988, Sage Publications.
39. Kurttila M., Pesonen M., Kangas J., Kajanus M. Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis - a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. For. Policy Econ. 2000, 1:41-52.
40. Kurttila M., Leskinen P., Tikkanen J., Niskanen A. Alueellisten metsäohjelmien kehittäminen toimintaympäristön näkökulmasta. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 2009, 3/2009:183-197. (in Finnish).
41. Lightfoot E., Pappas V.C., Chait J. Using open space technology to enable citizens to set the agenda for state disability planning. J.Disabil. Policy Stud. 2003, 14(1):7-16.
42. Lindsay G., Todd J.A., Hayter S.J., Ellis P.G. AHandbook for Planning and Conducting Charrettes for High-performance Projects 2009, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, (NREL), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 116 p. http://www.nrel.gov/sustainable_nrel/pdfs/44051.pdf, second ed.
43. MacIntosh A., Whyte A. Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation. Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy 2008, 2(1):16-30.
44. Margerum R.D. Atypology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environ. Manag. 2008, 41(4):487-500.
45. Martins H., Borges J.G. Addressing collaborative planning methods and tools in forest management. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 248:107-118.
46. Mayoux L. Participatory action learning system (PALS): impact assessment for civil society development and grassroots-based advocacy in Anandi, India. J.Int. Dev. 2005, 17(2):211-242.
47. McGurk B., Sinclair J.A., Diduck A. An assessment of stakeholder Advisory Committees in Forest management: case studies from Manitoba, Canada. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2006, 19:809-826.
48. McLain R.J., Lee R.G. Adaptive management: promises and pitfalls. Environ. Manag. 1996, 20(4):437-448.
49. Mendoza G.A., Martins H. Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 230(1-3):1-22.
50. Menzel S., Nordström E.-M., Buchecker M., Marques A., Saarikoski H., Kangas A. Decision support systems in forest management: requirements from a participatory planning perspective. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131(5):1367-1379.
51. Mustajoki J., Hämäläinen R.P. Web-HIPRE: global decision support by value tree and AHP analysis. INFOR 2000, 38(3):208-220.
52. Mustajoki J., Hämäläinen R.P., Salo A. Decision support by Interval SMART/SWING - a method to incorporate uncertainty into Multiattribute analysis. Decis. Sci. 2005, 36(2):317-339.
53. Mixing methods - assessment of potential benefits for natural resources planning. Scand. J. For. Res. 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.859297.
54. Nauheimer H., Ilieva E. Creating networks for social transformation through intercultural learning Bulgaria. Open Space Technology. New Stories from the Field: the Change Management Tool Book 2005, http://ncdd.org/rc/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/OST_StoriesFromField.pdf, H. Nauheimer (Ed.).
55. Ollonqvist P. Collaboration in the Forest Policy Arena in Finland - from Neo-Corporatist Planning to Participatory Program Preparation. National Forest Programmes in a European Context 2002, 27-47. EFI Proceedings No. 44. O. Gislerud, I. Neven (Eds.).
56. Olsen C.S., Shindler B.A. Trust, acceptance, and citizen-agency interactions after large fires: influences on planning processes. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2010, 19(1):137-147.
57. Olsson P., Folke C., Berkes F. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ. Manag. 2004, 34(1):75-90.
58. Palacios-Agundez I., Casado-Arzuaga I., Madariaga I., Onaindia M. The relevance of local participatory scenario planning for ecosystem management policies in the Basque Country, northern Spain. Ecol. Society 2013, 18(3):7.
59. Pearl J. "Bayesian networks: a model of self-activated memory for evidential reasoning" (UCLA Technical Report CSD-850017). Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the cognitive Science society, University of California, Irvine, CA 1985, 329-334.
60. Pellegrinelli S. Programme management: organising project-based change. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 1997, 15(3):141-149.
61. Prewitt V. Working in the café: lessons in group dialogue. Learn. Organ. 2011, 18(3):189-202.
62. Primmer E., Kyllönen S. Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8(8):838-853.
63. Pülzl H., Rametsteiner E. Grounding international modes of governance into national forest programmes. For. Policy Econ. 2002, 4(4):259-268.
64. Revans R. Action Learning: New Techniques for Management 1980, Blond & Briggs, Ltd, London.
65. Rohrbach B. Kreativ nach Regeln - Methode 635, eine neue Technik zum Lösen von Problemen. Absatzwirtschaft 1969, 12(19):73-75.
66. Saaty T.L. Ascaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J.Math. Psychol. 1977, 15(3):234-281.
67. Saaty T.L. 2001, RWS Publications, Decision Making with dependence and Feedback. Analytic Network Process: the Organization and Prioritization of Complexity, vol. 9, Analytic hierarchy process series, 370 p. second ed.
68. Salo A., Punkka A. Rank inclusion in criteria hierarchies. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 2005, 163(2):338-356.
69. Sager T. Communicative Planning Theory 1994, Avebury, Adelrshot, England, 288 p.
70. Saarikoski H., Tikkanen J., Leskinen L.A. Public participation in practice - assessing public participation in the preparation of regional forest programs in Northern Finland. For. Policy Econ. 2010, 12(5):349-356.
71. Schoop M., Jertila A., List T. Negoisst: a negotiation support system for electronic business-to-business negotiations in e-commerce. Data Knowl. Eng. 2003, 47:371-401.
72. Selin S., Chevez D. Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environ. Manag. 1995, 19(2):189-195.
73. Sheppard S.R.J., Meitner M. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 207:171-187.
74. Shucksmith M. Disintegrated rural development? Neo-endogenous rural development, planning and place-shaping in diffused power contexts. Sociol. Rural. 2010, 50(1):1-14.
75. Steelman T.A., Maguire L.A. Understanding Participant Perspectives: Q-Methodology in National Forest Management. J.Policy Anal. Manag. 1999, 18(3):361-388.
76. Suriya S., Mudgal B.V. Soft systems methodology and integrated flood management: a study of the Adayar watershed, Chennai, India. Water Environ. J. 2013, 27(4):462-473.
77. Thiry M. Combining value and project management into an effective programme management model. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2002, 20(3):221-227.
78. Tyrväinen L., Mäkinen K., Schipperijn J. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 79:5-19.
79. Ulrich H., Probst G. Anleitung zum ganzheitlichen Denken und Handeln 1995, Ein Brevier für Führungskräfte, Haupt, Bern.
80. Unalan D. Integrating cumulative impacts into strategic environmental decision-making: tourism development in Belek, Turkey. Land Use Policy 2013, 34:243-249.
81. Vacik H., Khadka C., Hujala T., Kurttila M., Haara A., Wolfslehner B., Pykäläinen J., Honkakoski P., Tikkanen J. Screening collaborative planning methods for supporting programme-based planning in natural resource management. Implementation of DSS Tools into the Forestry Practice 2013, 123-130. Technical University in Zvolen. J. Tucek, J. Smrecek, A. Majlingova, J. Garcia-Gonzalo (Eds.).
82. Weber B. Participatory district developing plan initialisation, Mozambique. Open Space Technology. New Stories from the Field: the Change Management Tool Book 2005, http://ncdd.org/rc/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/OST_StoriesFromField.pdf, H. Nauheimer (Ed.).
83. Webler T., Tuler S., Krueger R.O.B. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environ. Manage 2001, 27:435-450.
84. Weeks E.C. The practice of deliberative democracy: results from four large-scale Trials. Public Adm. Rev. 2000, 60(4):360-372.
85. Weisbord M., Janoff S. Future search. Getting the Whole System in the Room for Vision, Commitment, and Action 2010, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 336 p. third ed.
86. Werick W., Lorie M., Sanderson J. Shared vision planning for clean water act permits: an experiment in Colorado. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change 2010, 2185-2193. R.N. Palmer (Ed.).
87. White I., Kingston R., Barker A. Participatory geographic information systems and public engagement within flood risk management. J.Flood Risk Manag. 2010, 3(4):337-346.
88. Wilson M., Howarth R. Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41:431-443.
89. Woelfel J., Stoyanoff N. CATPAC: a neural network for qualitative analysis of text. Artificial Neural Networks for Advertising and Marketing Research 1995, 51-70. RAH Press, Amherst NY. J. Woelfel, N. Stoyanoff (Eds.).
90. Wolfslehner B., Seidl R. Harnessing ecosystem models and multi-criteria decision analysis for the support of forest management. Environ. Manage 2010, 46(6):850-861.
91. Wolfslehner B., Vacik H. Mapping indicator models: from intuitive problem structuring to quantified decision-making in sustainable forest management. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11(2):274-283.
92. von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research 1986, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
93. Zurita L. Consensus conference method in environmental issues: relevance and strengths. Land Use Policy 2006, 23(1):18-25.