Multicriteria prioritization of policy instruments in buildings energy retrofit;Ranking multicriteriale di politiche di incentivazione degli interventi di riqualificazione energetica degli edifici

Valori e Valutazioni

Volumn 2018, Issue 21, 2018, Pages 15-25

  D'Alpaos, Chiara ^a   Bragolusi, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

AHP; Buildings; Energy efficiency; Energy retrofit; Incentive policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056756996     PISSN: 20362404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. ALBERINI A., BIGANO A., How effective are energy-efficiency incentive programs Evidence from Italian homeowners, Energy Economics, 52, 2015, pp. 576-585.
2. ARTOLA I., RADEMAEKERS K., WILLIAMS R., YEARWOOD J., Boosting Building Renovation: What potential and value for Europe, European Parliament, Directorate General For Internal Policies Policy Department A: Economic And Scientific Policy, 2016, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies (last accessed on 18/01/2018).
3. ATANASIU B., KOULOUMPI I., Boosting Building Renovation. An Overview of Good Practices Renovation Requirements, Long-term Plans and Support Programmes in the EU and Other Selected Regions, Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE), Brussels, 2013.
4. ATANASIU B., MAIO J., STANIASZEK D., KOULOUMPI I., KENKMANN T., ENTRANZE, Overview of the EU-27 building policies and programs. Factsheets on the nine Entranze target countries. Cross-analysis on Member-States' plans to develop their Building Regulations towards the Nzeb standard, 2014, https://www.entranze.eu (last accessed on 2/2/2018).
5. BANZATO D., CANESI R., D'ALPAOS C., Biogas and Biomethane Technologies: An AHP Model to Support the Policy Maker in Incentive Design in Italy. In: Bisello A., Vettorato D., Laconte P., Costa S. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. SSPCR 2017, Green Energy and Technology (9783319757735), Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 319-331. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2-22.
6. BELTON V., STEWART T.J., (2010) Problem structuring and multiple criteria decision analysis. In Ehrgott M., Figueira J.R., Greco S. (Eds.): Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 142, Springer, Boston, MA, 2010, pp. 209-239.
7. BPIE (Building Performance Institute Europe), The BPIE data hub for the energy performance of buildings. In: BPIE data hub. (2015). https://www.buildingsdata.eu/(last accessed on 18/01/2018).
8. BONIFACI P., COPIELLO S., Incentive policies for residential buildings energy retrofit: An analysis of tax rebate programs in Italy. In: Bisello A., Vettorato D., Laconte P., Costa S. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. SSPCR 2017. Green Energy and Technology (9783319757735), Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 267-279.
9. BOTTEROM., D'ALPAOS C., DELL'ANNA F., Boosting investments in buildings energy retrofit: The role of incentives. In: Calabrò F., Della Spina L., Bevilacqua C. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 101. Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 593-600. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92102-0-63.
10. BUILDING STOCK OBSERVATORY, (2018). https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/data-analysis/building-stock-observatory (last accessed on 18/01/2018).
11. CANESI R., D'ALPAOS C., MARELLA M., Forced sale values vs. Market values in Italy, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 24(2), 2016, pp. 377-401.
12. CASTELLAZZI L., ZANGHERI P., PACI D., Synthesis Report on the assessment of Member States' building renovation strategies, Publications Office of the European Union, 2016, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-andtechnical-research-reports/synthesis-report-assessmentmember-states-building-renovation-strategies (last accessed on 2/2/2018).
13. CERIN P., HASSEL L., SEMENOVA N., Energy Performance and Housing Prices, Sustainable Development, 22, 2014, pp. 404-419.
14. CONTICELLI E., PROLI S., TONDELLI S., Integrating energy efficiency and urban densification policies: Two Italian case studies, Energy and Buildings 155, 2017, pp. 308-323.
15. CRESME, Riuso 2012. Città, mercato e rigenerazione. Analisi del contesto per una nuova politica urbana, CRESME, CNAP, ANCE, Roma, 2012. www.old.awn.it (last accessed on 30/11/2017).
16. DAWOOD S., CROSBIE T., DAWOOD N., LORD R., Designing low carbon buildings: A frame-work to reduce energy consumption and embed the use of renewables, Sustainable Cities and Society, 8, 2013, pp. 63-71.
17. D'ALPAOS C., Methodological Approaches to the Valuation of Investments in Biogas Production Plants: Incentives vs. Market Prices in Italy, Valori e Valutazioni, 19, 2017, pp. 53-64.
18. D'ALPAOS C., BRAGOLUSI P., Buildings energy retrofit valuation approaches: State of the art and future perspectives, Valori e Valutazioni, 20, 2018, pp. 79-94.
19. D'ALPAOS C., BRAGOLUSI P., Prioritization of Energy Retrofit Strategies in Public Housing: An AHP mode. In Calabrò F., Della Spina L., Bevilacqua C. (eds): New Metropolitan Perspectives. ISHT 2018. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 101, 2019, pp. 534-541. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92102-0-56.
20. DE FELICE F., PETRILLO A., Absolute measurement with analytic hierarchy process: A case study for Italian racecourse, International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences 6(3), 2013, pp. 209-227.
21. DE RUGGIEROM., FORESTIEROG., MANGANELLI B., Salvo F. Buildings Energy Performance in a Market Comparison Approach, Buildings, 7(1), 16, 2017.
22. DONGQ., SAATY T.L, An analytic hierarchy process model of group consensus, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 23(3), 2014, pp. 362-374.
23. DONGYAN L., Fiscal and tax policy support for energy efficiency tretrofit for existing residential buildings in China's northerm heating region, Energy Policy 37, 2009, pp, 2113-2118.
24. DRESNER S., EKINS P., Economic Instruments to Improve UK Home Energy Efficiency without Negative Social Impacts, Fiscal Studies 27(1), 2006, pp. 47-74.
25. ECONOMIDOUM., BERTOLDI P., Financing building energy renovations. Current experiences& ways forward, JRC Science and Policy Reports, Publications Office of the European Union, Brussels, 2014, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/financing-building-energy-renovations-current-experiences-andways-forward (last accessed on 12/3/2018).
26. ENEA, Rapporto Annuale-Efficienza Energetica, Analisi e Risultati delle Policy di Efficienza Energetica del Nostro Paese, 2017a, pp. 1-33. http://enerweb.casaccia.enea.it/enearegioni/UserFiles/RAEE-2017.pdf (last accessed on 20/12/2017).
27. ENEA, Rapporto Annuale 2017-Le detrazioni fiscali del 65% per la riqualificazione energetica del patrimonio edilizio esistente, 2017b, www.efficienzaenergetica.enea.it/allegati/Detrazioni-65-2017-.pdf (last accessed on 20/12/2017).
28. EVOLAG., Margani G. Renovation of apartment blocks with BIPV: Energy and economic evaluation in temperate climate, Energy and Buildings 130, 2016, pp. 794-810.
29. FERREIRA F. A., SANTOS S. P., DIASV. M., An AHP-based approach to credit risk evaluation of mortgage loans, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 18(1), 2014, pp. 38-55.
30. FRANCO L.A., MONTIBELLERG., Problem structuring for multirivista criteria decision analysis interventions, John Wiley&Sons, Oxford, 2011.
31. GARBUZOVA-SCHLIFTERNM., MADLENER R., AHP-based risk analysis of energy performance contracting projects in Russia, Energy Policy 97, 2016, pp. 559-581.
32. GRAFAKOS S., FLAMOS A., ENSEÑADO E.M., Preferences matter: A constructive approach to incorporating local stakeholders' preferences in the sustainability evaluation of energy technologies, Sustainability 7(8), 215, pp. 10922-10960.
33. GROŠELJ P., ZADNIK STIRN L., Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 223(2), 2012, pp. 417-4201.
34. HADDAD B., LIAZID A., FERREIRA P., A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system, Renewable Energy, 107, 2017, pp. 462-472.
35. ISHIZAKA A., LABIB A., Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process, Expert Systems with Applications 38, 2011, pp. 14336-14345.
36. ISTAT, 15° Censimento della popolazione e delle abitazioni, http://www.istat.it/it/censimento-popolazione/censimento-popolazione-2011, ultimo accesso 1/1/2018.
37. KEENEY R.L., Value-focused thinking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA), 1992.
38. LEEW.L., YIK F.W.H., Regulatory and voluntary approaches for enhancing building energy efficiency, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 30(5), 2004, pp. 477-499.
39. MARTTUNENM., LIENERT J., BELTON V., Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations, European Journal of Operational Research, 263, 2017, pp. 1-17.
40. MINISTERO DELLO SVILUPPO ECONOMICO, Relazione annuale sull'efficienza energetica-Risultati conseguiti e obiettivi al 2020, Direzione generale per il mercato elettrico, le rinnovabili e l'efficienza energetica, il nucleare, 2017, pp. 1-28.
41. RE CECCONI F., TAGLIABUE L.C., MALTESE S., ZUCCAROM., A multi-criteria framework for decision process in retrofit optioneering through interactive data flow, Procedia Engineering, 180, 2017, pp. 859-869.
42. ROY B., Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996.
43. SAATY, T.L., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 1977, pp. 234-281.
44. SAATY T.L., The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
45. SAATY T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Conflict Management, The International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(1), 1990, pp. 47-68.
46. SAATY T.L., VARGAS L.G., Experiments on rank preservation and reversal in relative measurement, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 17(4-5), 1993, pp. 3-18.
47. SAATY T.L., Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 2000.
48. SAATY T.L., Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary, European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 2003, pp. 85-91.
49. SAATY T.L., PENIWATI K., Group Decision Making Drawing Out and Reconciling Differences, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 2012.
50. SAATY T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Processes for the Measurement of Intangible Criteria and for Decision-Making. In: Greco S., Ehrgott M., Figueira J. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 233. Springer, New York, NY, 2016, pp. 363-419.
51. Xu, Z., On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgment matrix in AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 126(3), 2000, pp. 683-687.
52. WILSONC., CRANE L., CHRYSSOCHOIDISG., Why do homeowners renovate energy efficiently Contrasting perspectives and implications for policy, Energy Research and Social Science, 7(128), 2015, pp. 12-22.
53. WILSONC., PETTIFORH., CHRYSSOCHOIDISG., Quantitative modelling of why and how homeowners decide to renovate energy efficiently, Applied Energy 212, 2018, pp. 1333-1344.