Prioritization of energy retrofit strategies in public housing: An AHP model

Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies

Volumn 101, Issue , 2019, Pages 534-541

  D’Alpaos, Chiara ^a   Bragolusi, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

AHP; Buildings energy retrofit; Public housing

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INVESTMENTS; RETROFITTING;

DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATIONS; ENERGY RETROFIT; FINANCIAL RESOURCES; METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVES; PUBLIC HOUSING; RETROFIT STRATEGIES; SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL;

HOUSING;

EID: 85048052416     PISSN: 21903018     EISSN: 21903026     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92102-0_56     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Lucon O., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Zain Ahmed, A., Akbari, H., Bertoldi, P., Cabeza, L. F., Eyre, N., Gadgil, A., Harvey, L. D.D., Jiang, Y., Liphoto, E., Mirasgedis, S., Murakami, S., Parikh, J., Pyke, C., Vilariño, M.V.: Buildings. In: Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C. (eds.): Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom (2014)
2. UNEP: Why Buildings? Buildings Day at COP21, 3 December 2015, Paris, France (2015). Accessed 30 Nov 2017. http://web.unep.org/climatechange/cop21?page=7
3. Beccali, M., Ciulla, G., Lo Brano, V., Galatioto, A., Bonomolo, M.: Artificial neural network decision support tool for assessment of the energy performance and the refurbishment actions for the non-residential building stock in Southern Italy. Energy 137, 1201-1218 (2017)
4. Fraunhofer ISI, How energy efficiency cuts costs for a 2-degree future, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Karlsruhe, Germany (2015). Accessed 30 Nov 2017. http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-en/service/presseinfos/2015/press-release-34-2015-energy-efficiency-two-degree-target.php
5. Machairas, V., Tsangrassoulis, A., Axarli, K.: Algorithms for optimization of building design: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 31, 101-112 (2014)
6. Si, J., Marjanovic-Halburda, L., Nasirib, F., Bell, S.: Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: a review and case study on applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method. Sustainable Cities and Society 27, 106-115 (2016)
7. Visscher, H., Sartori, I., Dascalaki, E.: Towards an energy efficient European housing stock: monitoring, mapping and modelling retrofitting processes. Energy Build. 79, 1-3 (2016)
8. Becchio, C., Corgnati, S.P., Delmastro, C., Fabi, V., Lombradi, P.: The role of nearly-zero energy buildings in the transition towards post-carbon cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 27, 324- 337 (2016)
9. ISTAT. 15° Censimento della popolazione e delle abitazioni. Accessed 12 Jan 2011. http://www.istat.it/it/censimento-popolazione/censimento-popolazione-2011
10. Diakaki, C., Grigoroudis, E., Kolokotsa, D.: Performance study of a multi-objective mathematical programming modelling approach for energy decision-making in buildings. Energy 59, 534-542 (2013)
11. Lizana, J., Barrios-Padura, A., Molina-Huelvab, M., Chacartegui, R.: Multi-criteria assessment for the effective decision management in residential energy retrofitting. Energy Build. 129, 284-307 (2016)
12. Marinakis, V., Doukas, H., Xidonas, P., Zopounidis, C.: Multicriteria decision support in local energy planning: An evaluation of alternative scenarios for the sustainable energy action plan. Omega 69, 1-16 (2017)
13. Ma, Z., Cooper, P., Daly, D., Ledo, L.: Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy Build. 55, 889-902 (2012)
14. Harvey, L.D.: Recent advances in sustainable buildings: review of the energy and cost performance of the state-of-the-art best practices from around the world. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38, 281-309 (2013)
15. Corrado, V., Ballarini, I., Paduos, S.: Assessment of cost-optimal energy performance requirements for the Italian residential building stock. Energy Procedia 45, 443-452 (2014)
16. Tan, B., Yavuz, Y., Otay, E.N., Çamlıbel, E.: Optimal selection of energy efficiency measures for energy sustainability of existing buildings. Comput. Oper. Res. 66, 258-271 (2016)
17. Gianfrate, V., Piccardo, C., Longo, D., Giachetta, A.: Rethinking social housing: Behavioural patterns and technological innovations. Sustain. Cities Soc. 33, 102-112 (2017)
18. Antoniucci, V., D’Alpaos, C., Marella, G.: Energy saving in tall buildings: from urban planning regulation to smart grid building solutions. Int. J. Hous. Sci. Appl. 39(2), 101-110 (2015)
19. Dawood, S., Crosbie, T., Dawood, N., Lord, R.: Designing low carbon buildings: a framework to reduce energy consumption and embed the use of renewables. Sustain. Cities Soc. 8, 63-71 (2013)
20. Re Cecconi, F., Tagliabue, L.C., Maltese, S., Zuccaro, M.: A multi-criteria framework for decision process in retrofit optioneering through interactive data flow. Procedia Eng. 180, 859-869 (2017)
21. D’Alpaos, C.: Methodological Approaches to the Valuation of Investments in Biogas Production Plants: Incentives vs. Market Prices in Italy. Valori e Valutazioni 19, 53-64 (2017)
22. Saaty, T.: The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
23. De Felice, F., Petrillo, A.: Absolute measurement with analytic hierarchy process: a case study for Italian racecourse. Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci. 6(3), 209-227 (2013)
24. Ferreira, F.A., Santos, S.P., Dias, V.M.: An AHP-based approach to credit risk evaluation of mortgage loans. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 18(1), 38-55 (2014)
25. Grafakos, S., Flamos, A., Enseñado, E.M.: Preferences matter: A constructive approach to incorporating local stakeholders’ preferences in the sustainability evaluation of energy technologies. Sustainability 7(8), 10922-10960 (2015)
26. Garbuzova-Schliftern, M., Madlener, R.: AHP-based risk analysis of energy performance contracting projects in Russia. Energy Policy 97, 559-581 (2016)
27. Banzato, D., Canesi, R., D’Alpaos, C.: Biogas and biomethane technologies: an AHP model to support the policy maker in incentive design in Italy. In: Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Laconte, P., Costa, S. (eds.) Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. SSPCR 2017. Green Energy and Technology, pp. 319-331 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2_22. ISBN 9783319757735
28. Saaty, T.L.: Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2000)
29. Saaty, T.L., Peniwati, K.: Group Decision Making Drawing Out and Reconciling Differences. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2012)
30. Ciulla, G., Lo Brano, V., D’Amico, A.: Modelling relationship among energy demand, climate and office building features: a cluster analysis at European level. Appl. Energy 183, 1021-1034 (2016)
31. Peniwati, K.: Criteria for evaluating group decision-making methods. Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 95, 251-273 (2006)
32. Senge, P.M.: The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. Currency Doubleday New York (2006)
33. D’Alpaos, C.: The value of flexibility to switch between water supply sources. Appl. Math. Sci. 6(125-128), 6381-6401 (2012)
34. Bertolini, M., D’Alpaos, C., Moretto, M.: Do smart grids boost investments in domestic PV plants? evidence from the Italian electricity market. Energy 149, 890-902 (2018)
35. Xu, Z.: On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 126(3), 683-687 (2000)
36. Grošelj, P., Zadnik Stirn, L.: Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(2), 417-4201 (2012)