-
2
-
-
0037024214
-
Effects of editorial peer review: A systematic review
-
Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;287:2784-6
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.287
, pp. 2784-2786
-
-
Jefferson, T.1
Alderson, P.2
Wager, E.3
Davidoff, F.4
-
3
-
-
0032527549
-
Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: A randomized controlled trial
-
Godlee F, Gale CR, Martyn CN. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 1998;280:237-40
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.280
, pp. 237-240
-
-
Godlee, F.1
Gale, C.R.2
Martyn, C.N.3
-
4
-
-
1642325520
-
Effects of training on quality of peer review: Randomised controlled trial
-
Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Carpenter J, Godlee F, Smith R. Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004;328:673
-
(2004)
BMJ
, vol.328
, pp. 673
-
-
Schroter, S.1
Black, N.2
Evans, S.3
Carpenter, J.4
Godlee, F.5
Smith, R.6
-
5
-
-
0030960168
-
Sexism and nepotism in peer-review
-
Wennerås C, Wold A. Sexism and nepotism in peer-review. Nature 1997;387:341-3
-
(1997)
Nature
, vol.387
, pp. 341-343
-
-
Wennerås, C.1
Wold, A.2
-
6
-
-
0019977694
-
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of submitted articles, submitted again
-
Peters D, Ceci S. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: the fate of submitted articles, submitted again. Behav Brain Sci 1982;5:187-255.
-
(1982)
Behav Brain Sci
, vol.5
, pp. 187-255
-
-
Peters, D.1
Ceci, S.2
-
7
-
-
0021050324
-
The critical attitude in medicine: The need for a new ethics
-
McIntyre N, Popper K. The critical attitude in medicine: the need for a new ethics. BMJ 1983;287:1919-23
-
(1983)
BMJ
, vol.287
, pp. 1919-1923
-
-
McIntyre, N.1
Popper, K.2
-
8
-
-
0031036493
-
Pardonable revisions and protocol reviews
-
Horton R. Pardonable revisions and protocol reviews. Lancet 1997;349:6
-
(1997)
Lancet
, vol.349
, pp. 6
-
-
Horton, R.1
-
9
-
-
0142034576
-
Misconduct and journal peer review
-
Godlee F, Jefferson T, eds. London: BMJ Books
-
Rennie D. Misconduct and journal peer review. In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, eds. Peer Review In Health Sciences, 2nd edn. London: BMJ Books, 2003:118-29
-
(2003)
Peer Review in Health Sciences, 2nd Edn.
, pp. 118-129
-
-
Rennie, D.1
-
10
-
-
0025055343
-
The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial
-
McNutt RA, Evans AT, Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. JAMA 1990;263:1371-6
-
(1990)
JAMA
, vol.263
, pp. 1371-1376
-
-
McNutt, R.A.1
Evans, A.T.2
Fletcher, R.H.3
Fletcher, S.W.4
-
11
-
-
0032527565
-
Does masking author identity improve peer review quality: A randomised controlled trial
-
Justice AC, Cho MK, Winker MA, Berlin JA, Rennie D, the PEER investigators. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 1998;280:240-2
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.280
, pp. 240-242
-
-
Justice, A.C.1
Cho, M.K.2
Winker, M.A.3
Berlin, J.A.4
Rennie, D.5
-
12
-
-
0032527564
-
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomised trial
-
van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Smith R, Black N. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomised trial. JAMA 1998;280:234-7
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.280
, pp. 234-237
-
-
Van Rooyen, S.1
Godlee, F.2
Evans, S.3
Smith, R.4
Black, N.5
-
13
-
-
0033514073
-
Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: A randomised trial
-
van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Black N, Smith R. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial. BMJ 1999;318:23-7
-
(1999)
BMJ
, vol.318
, pp. 23-27
-
-
Van Rooyen, S.1
Godlee, F.2
Evans, S.3
Black, N.4
Smith, R.5
|