Automation and situation awareness

Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 163-181

  Endsley, Mica R ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

20TH CENTURY; AUTOMATED SYSTEMS; COGNITIVE TASK; ELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS; REDUCED COST; SITUATION AWARENESS; SYSTEM CONTROL;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85052434608     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781315137957     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19, 775-779.
2. Billings, C. E. (1991). Human-centered aircraft automation: A concept and guidelines (NASA Technical Memorandum 103885). Moffet Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
3. Carmody, M. A., & Gluckman, J. P. (1993). Task specific effects of automation and automation failure on performance, workload and situational awareness. In R. S. Jensen & D. Neumeister (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 167-171). Columbus, OH: Department of Aviation, The Ohio State University.
4. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 163-191.
5. Curry, R. E., & Ephrath, A. R. (1977). Monitoring and control of unreliable systems. In Т. B. Sheridan & G. Johannsen (Eds.), Monitoring behavior and supervisory control (pp. 193-203). New York: Plenum.
6. Danaher, J. W. (1980). Human error in АТС system operations. Human Factors, 22(5), 535-545.
7. Endsley, M. R. (1987a). SAGA T: A methodology for the measurement of situation awareness (NOR DOC 87-83). Hawthorne, CA: Northrop Corporation.
8. Endsley, M. (1987b). The application of human factors to the development of expert systems for advanced cockpits. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 1388-1392). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
9. Endsley, M. R. (1988a). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 97-101). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
10. Endsley, M. R. (1988b). Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In Proceedings of the National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON) (pp. 789-795). New York: IEEE.
11. Endsley, M. R. (1989). A methodology for the objective measurement of situation awareness. In Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations (AGARD-CP-478) (pp. 1/1-1/9). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: NATO-AGARD.
12. Endsley, M. R. (1990a). Predictive utility of an objective measure of situation awareness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (pp. 41-45). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
13. Endsley, M. R. (1990b). Situation awareness in dynamic human decision making: Theory and measurement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
14. Endsley, M. R. (1993a). Situation awareness and workload: Flip sides of the same coin. In R. S. Jensen & D. Neumeister (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 906-911). Columbus, OH: Department of Aviation, The Ohio State University.
15. Endsley, M. R. (1993b). Situation awareness: A fundamental factor underlying the successful implementation of AI in the air traffic control system. In D. J. Garland & J. A. Wise (Eds.), Human factors and advanced automation technologies (pp. 117-122). Daytona Beach, FL: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.
16. Endsley, M. R. (1994a, March). A taxonomy of situation awareness errors. Paper presented at the Western European Association of Aviation Psychology 21st Conference, Dublin, Ireland.
17. Endsley, M. R. (1994b). Situation awareness in dynamic human decision making: Measurement. In R. D. Gilson, D. J. Garland, & J. M. Koonce (Eds.), Situational awareness in complex systems (pp. 79-97). Daytona Beach, FL: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.
18. Endsley, M. R., & Kiris, E. O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37(2), 381-394.
19. Ephrath, A. R., & Young, L. R. (1981). Monitoring vs. man-in-the-loop detection of aircraft control failures. In J. Rasmussen & W. B. Rouse (Eds.), Human detection and diagnosis of system failures (pp. 143-154). New York: Plenum.
20. Gluckman, J. P., Carmody, M. A., Morrison, J. G., Hitchcock, E. M., & Warm, J. S. (1993). Effects of allocation and partitioning strategies of adaptive automation on task performance and perceived workload in aviation relevant tasks. In R. S. Jensen & D. Neumeister (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 150-155). Columbus, OH: Department of Aviation, The Ohio State University.
21. Grubb, P. L., Miller, L. C., Nelson, W. T., Warm, J. S., & Dember, W. N. (1994). Cognitive failure and perceived workload in vigilance performance. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasu-raman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 115-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Hansman, R. J., Wanke, C., Kuchar, J., Mykityshyn, M., Hahn, E., & Midkiff, A. (1992, September). Hazard alerting and situational awareness in advanced air transport cockpits. Paper presented at the 18th ICAS Congress, Beijing, China.
23. Harris, W. C., Goemert, P. N., Hancock, P. A., & Arthur, E. (1994). The comparative effectiveness of adaptive automation and operator initiated automation during anticipated and unanticipated taskload increases. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 40-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Hartel, C. E., Smith, K., & Prince, C. (1991, April). Defining aircrew coordination: Searching mishaps for meaning. Paper presented at the Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH.
25. Kantowitz, B. H., & Sorkin, R. D. (1983). Human factors: Understanding people-system relationships. New York: Wiley.
26. Kessel, C. J., & Wickens, C. D. (1982). The transfer of failure-detection skills between monitoring and controlling dynamic systems. Human Factors, 24(1), 49-60.
27. Kuipers, A., Kappers, A., van Holten, C. R., van Bergen, J. H. W., & Oosterveld, W. J. (1989). Spatial disorientation incidents in the R.N.L.A.F. F16 and F5 aircraft and suggestions for prevention. In Situational awareness in aerospace operations (AGARD-CP-478) (pp. OV/E/l-OV/E/16). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: NATO-AGARD.
28. Lee, J., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1243-1270.
29. Lewandowski, S., Durso, F. T., & Grounlund, S. D. (1994). Modular automation: Automating sub-tasks without disrupting task flow. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 326-331). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. McClumpha, A., & James, M. (1994). Understanding automated aircraft. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 183-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Morrison, J., Cohen, D., & Gluckman, J. P. (1993). Prospective principles and guidelines for the design of adaptively automated crewstations. In R. S. Jensen & D. Neumeister (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 172-177). Columbus, OH: Department of Aviation, The Ohio State University.
32. National Transportation Safety Board (1988). Aircraft accident report: Northwest Airlines, Inc., McDonnell-Douglas DC-9-82, N312RC, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, August, 16, 1987 (NTSB/AAR-99-05). Washington, DC: Author.
33. National Transportation Safety Board (1990). Aircraft accident report: USAir, Inc., Boeing 737-400, LaGuardia Airport, Flushing New York, September 20, 1989 (NTSB/AAR-90-03). Washington, DC: Author.
34. Norman, D. A. (1989). The problem of automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction not overautomation (ICS Report 8904). La Jolla, CA: Institute for Cognitive Science, University of California-San Diego.
35. Parasuraman, R. (1987). Human-computer monitoring. Human Factors, 29(6), 695-706.
36. Parasuraman, R. (1993). Effects of adaptive function allocation on human performance. In D. J. Garland & J. A. Wise (Eds.), Human factors and advanced aviation technologies (pp. 147-158). Daytona Beach, FL: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Press.
37. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced complacency. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(1), 1-23.
38. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., & Molloy, R. (1994). Monitoring automation failures in human-machine systems. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 45-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Riley, V. (1994). A theory of operator reliance on automation. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 8-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Rudisill, M. (1994). Flight crew experience with automation technologies on commercial transport flight decks. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 203-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1992). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation: Operational experiences with the flight management system. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2(4), 303-321.
42. Selcon, S. J., & Taylor, R. M. (1989). Evaluation of the situational awareness rating technique (SART) as a tool for aircrew systems design. In Situational awareness in aerospace operations (AGARD-CP-478) (pp. 5/1-5/8). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: NATO-AGARD.
43. Singh, I. L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1993). Automation-induced complacency: Development of the complacency-potential rating scale. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(2), 111-122.
44. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 592-604.
45. Stein, K. J. (1983, October 3). Human factors analyzed in 007 navigation error. Aviation Week & Space Technology, pp. 165-167.
46. Taylor, R. M. (1989). Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In Situational awareness in aerospace operations (AGARD-CP-478) (pp. 3/1-3/17). Neuilly Sur Seine, France: NATO-AGARD.
47. Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
48. Wickens, C. D., & Kessel, C. (1979). The effect of participatory mode and task workload on the detection of dynamic system failures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-9(1), 24-34.
49. Wiener, E. L. (1985). Cockpit automation: In need of a philosophy. In Proceedings of the 1985 Behavioral Engineering Conference (pp. 369-375). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
50. Wiener, E. L. (1989). Human factors of advanced technology (“glass cockpit“) transport aircraft (NASA Contractor Report No. 177528). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
51. Wiener, E. L. (1992, June). The impact of automation on aviation human factors. Paper presented at the NASA/FAA Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Human Factors in Air Traffic Control and Aviation Maintenance, Daytona Beach, FL.
52. Wiener, E. L. (1993). Life in the second decade of the glass cockpit. In R. S. Jensen & D. Neumeister (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1-11). Columbus, OH: Department of Aviation, The Ohio State University.
53. Wiener, E. L., & Curry, R. E. (1980). Flight deck automation: Promises and problems. Ergonomics, 23(10), 995-1011.
54. Young, L. R. A. (1969). On adaptive manual control. Ergonomics, 12(4), 635-657.