Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 109, Issue , 2017, Pages 18-28

  Forster, Yannick ^a   Naujoks, Frederik ^b   Neukum, Alexandra ^b   Huestegge, Lynn ^b  

^a Wuerzburg Institute for Traffic Sciences GmbH (WIVW)   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conditional automation; Highly automated driving; Human machine interface; Human machine interaction

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; NETWORK SECURITY; SEMANTICS; SPEECH;

ALLOCATION OF ATTENTIONS; AUTOMATED DRIVING; FASTER REACTIONS; HUMAN MACHINE INTERACTION; HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS; SUBJECTIVE RATING; VISUAL WORKLOADS;

HUMAN REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTOMATION; CAR DRIVING; COGNITION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85030702809     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.019     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allport, D.A., Styles, E.A., Hsieh, S., Exploring the Dynamic Control of Tasks Shifting Intentional Set. 1994.
2. Alvarez, I., Martin, A., Dunbar, J., Taiber, J., Wilson, D.-M., Gilbert, J.E., Designing driver-centric natural voice user interfaces. Adj. Proc. AutomotiveUI 11 (2011), 42–49.
3. Barón, A., Green, P., Safety and Usability of Speech Interfaces for In-vehicle Tasks While Driving: A Brief Literature Review. 2006, University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.
4. Bazilinskyy, P., de Winter, J., Auditory interfaces in automated driving: an international survey. PeerJ Comput. Sci., 1, 2015.
5. Bliss, J.P., Acton, S.A., Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. Appl. Ergon. 34:6 (2003), 499–509.
6. Brooke, J., SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189:194 (1996), 4–7.
7. Cotté, N., Meyer, J., Coughlin, J.F., Older and younger drivers' reliance on collision warning systems. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2001.
8. Endsley, M., Garland, D.J., Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, 2000, 3–32.
9. Eriksson, A., Stanton, N.A., Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: non-critical transitions to and from manual control. Hum. Factors 59:4 (2016), 689–705.
10. Flemisch, F., Heesen, M., Hesse, T., Kelsch, J., Schieben, A., Beller, J., Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations. Cognit. Technol. Work 14:1 (2012), 3–18.
11. Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., Neukum, A., Your turn or my turn? Design of a Human-Machine Interface for Conditional Automation. Paper Presented at the 8th Conference of User Interfaces and Vehicular Applications, Ann Arbor, MI, 2016.
12. Gasser, T.M., Westhoff, D., BASt-study: definitions of automation and legal issues in Germany. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2012 Road Vehicle Automation Workshop, 2012.
13. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K., Take over! How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2013.
14. Hakuli, S., Bruder, R., Flemisch, F., Löper, C., Rausch, H., Schreiber, M., Winner, H., Kooperative automation Handbuch Fahrerassistenzsysteme. 2012, Springer, 641–650.
15. Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Krems, J.F., Prior familiarization with takeover requests affects drivers’ takeover performance and automation trust. Hum. Factors, 2016 0018720816678714.
16. Hoffmann, S., Kruger, H.P., Buld, S., Avoidance of simulator sickness by training the adaptation to the driving simulation. VDI BERICHTE 1745 (2003), 385–406.
17. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A.M., Koch, I., Control and interference in task switching—a review. Psychol. Bull., 136(5), 2010, 849.
18. Lenné, M.G., Triggs, T.J., Warning drivers of approaching hazards: the importance of location cues and multi-sensory cues. Hum. Factors Secur. Safe., 2009, 203–211.
19. Lorenz, L., Kerschbaum, P., Hergeth, S., Gold, C., Radlmayr, J., Der fahrer im hochautomatisierten fahrzeug. vom dual task zum sequential task paradigma. Paper Presented at the 7. Tagung Fahrerassistenz, 2014.
20. Lorenz, L., Kerschbaum, P., Hergeth, S., Gold, C., Radlmayr, J., 2015. Vom Dual-Task zum Sequential-Task Paradigma: Ein R{ü}ckblick {ü}ber Fahrsimulatorstudien. Paper presented at the 7. Tagung Fahrerassistenz.
21. Merat, N., Jamson, H., Lai, F., Daly, M., Carsten, O., Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psych. Behav. 27 (2014), 274–282 citeulike-article-id:14113872.
22. Meyer, J., Conceptual issues in the study of dynamic hazard warnings. Hum. Factors 46:2 (2004), 196–204.
23. Naujoks, F., Grattenthaler, H., Neukum, A., Zeitliche Gestaltung Effektiver Fahrerinformationen Zur Kollisionsvermeidung Auf Der Basis Kooperativer Perzeption. Paper presented at the 8. Workshop FAS, 2012.
24. Naujoks, F., Mai, C., Neukum, A., The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. Adv. Hum. Aspects Transp. (Part I), 2014, 431.
25. Naujoks, F., Grattenthaler, H., Neukum, A., Weidl, G., Petrich, D., Effectiveness of advisory warnings based on cooperative perception. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 9:6 (2015), 606–617.
26. Naujoks, F., Purucker, C., Neukum, A., Wolter, S., Steiger, R., Controllability of partially automated driving functions–does it matter whether drivers are allowed to take their hands off the steering wheel?. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 35 (2015), 185–198.
27. Naujoks, F., Forster, Y., Wiedemann, K., Neukum, A., A human-Machine interface for cooperative highly automated driving. Paper Presented at the 7th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Orlando, FL, 2016.
28. Naujoks, F., Forster, Y., Wiedemann, K., Neukum, A., Speech improves human-automation cooperation in automated driving. Mensch Und Computer 2016–Workshopband, 2016.
29. Naujoks, F., Kiesel, A., Neukum, A., Cooperative warning systems: the impact of false and unnecessary alarms on drivers’ compliance. Accident Anal. Prev. 97 (2016), 162–175.
30. Naujoks, F., Forster, Y., Wiedemann, K., Neukum, A., Improving usefulness of automated driving by lowering primary task interference through HMI design. J. Adv. Transp., 2017.
31. Payre, W., Cestac, J., Delhomme, P., Fully automated driving impact of trust and practice on manual control recovery human factors. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 58:2 (2016), 229–241.
32. Politis, I., Brewster, S., Pollick, F., Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2015.
33. Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., Bengler, K., How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2014.
34. Rauch, A., Klanner, F., Rasshofer, R., Dietmayer, K., Car2x-based perception in a high-level fusion architecture for cooperative perception systems. Paper Presented at the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2012 IEEE, 2012.
35. Rogers, R.D., Monsell, S., Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 124(2), 1995, 207.
36. SAE, Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles J3016R. 2016, SAE International.
37. Seeliger, F., Weidl, G., Petrich, D., Naujoks, F., Breuel, G., Neukum, A., Dietmayer, K., Advisory warnings based on cooperative perception. Paper Presented at the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings, 2014 IEEE, 2014.
38. Stanton, N.A., Edworthy, J., Human Factors in Auditory Warnings. 1999, Ashgate.
39. Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H., Salmon, P.M., Human Factors in Automotive Engineering and Technology. 2015, Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
40. Vilimek, R., Hempel, T., Effects of Speech and Non-Speech Sounds on Short-Term Memory and Possible Implications for In-Vehicle Use. 2005.
41. Wiedemann, K., Schömig, N., Mai, C., Naujoks, F., Neukum, A., Drivers' monitoring behaviour and interaction with non-driving related tasks during driving with different automation levels. Paper Presented at the 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE), Las Vegas, USA, 2015.