The delayed jol effect with very long delays: Evidence from flashbulb memories

Handbook of Metamemory and Memory

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 155-172

  Weaver, Charles A ^a   Terrell, J Trent ^a   Krug, Kevin S ^b   Kelemen, William L ^c  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064099669     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203805503     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Arbuckle, T. Y., & Cuddy, L. L. (1969). Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 81, 126-131.
2. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology- General, 127, 55-68.
3. Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2006). Flashbulb memories and posttraumatic stress reactions across the life span: Age-related effects of the German occupation of Denmark during World War II. Psychology and Aging, 21, 127-139.
4. Bohannon, J. N. (1988). Flashbulb memories for the space shuttle disaster: A tale of two theories. Cognition, 29, 179-196.
5. Brown, R., & Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories. Cognition, 5, 73-99.
6. Candel, I., Jelicic, M., Merckelbach, H., & Wester, A. (2003). Korsakoff patients’ memories of September 11, 2001. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191, 262-265.
7. Christianson, S. A. (1989). Flashbulb memories: Special, but not so special. Memory and Cognition, 17, 435-443.
8. Christianson, S. A., & Engelberg, E. (1999). Memory and emotional consistency: The MS Estonia ferry disaster. Memory, 7, 471-482.
9. Coluccia, E., Bianco, C., & Brandimonte, M. A. (2006). Dissociating veridicality, consistency, and confidence in autobiographical and event memories for the Columbia shuttle disaster. Memory, 14, 452-470.
10. Craik, F. I. M., & Watkins, M. J. (1973). The role of rehearsal in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12.
11. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory and Cognition, 20, 374-380.
12. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545-565.
13. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1997). Similarity between the cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the cue for test is not the primary determinant of JOL accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 34-49.
14. Finkenauer, C., Luminet, O., Gisle, L., El Ahmadi, A., van der Linden, M., & Philippot, P. (1998). Flashbulb memories and the underlying mechanisms of their formation: Toward an emotional-integrative model. Memory and Cognition, 26, 516-531.
15. Greenberg, D. L. (2004). President Bush’s false “flashbulb” memory of 9/11/01. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 363-370.
16. Guilmette, T. J., Carroll, B., Ferreira, J., Magner, E., Mihuta, M., & Kennedy, M. L. (2004). Recall of 9/11/01 as an indicator of cognitive functioning in the elderly. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 11, 450-458.
17. Hall, L. K., & Bahrick, H. P. (1998). The validity of metacognitive predictions of widespread learning and long-term retention. In G. Mazzoni & T. O. Nelson (Eds.), Metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology: Monitoring and control processes (pp. 23-36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Hertzog, C., Kidder, D. P., Powell-Moman, A. & Dunlosky, J. (2002). Aging and monitoring associative learning: Is monitoring accuracy spared or impaired? Psychology and Aging, 17, 209-225.
19. Hyman, I. E. (1999). Creating false autobiographical memories: Why people believe their memory errors. In E. Winograd (Ed.), Ecological approaches to cognition: Essays in honor of Ulric Neisser (pp. 229-252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Jameson, A., Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., & Narens, L. (1993). The feeling of another person’s knowing. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 320-335.
21. Kelemen, W. L., & Weaver, C. A., III. (1997). Enhanced memory at delays: Why do judgments of learning improve over time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1394-1409.
22. Kimball, D. R., & Metcalfe, J. (2002). Explaining the delayed-JOL effect: Evidence of a Heisenberg effect. Paper presented at the 43rd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November 2002, Kansas City, MO.
23. Kimball, D. R., & Metcalfe, J. (2003). Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 918-929.
24. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
25. Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L., & Bar, S. K. (2004). Predicting one’s own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 133, 643-656.
26. Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481-537.
27. Koriat, A., & Ma’ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 478.
28. Koriat, A., Sheffer, L., & Ma’ayan, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 147-162.
29. Koss, M. P., Tromp, S., & Tharan, M. (1995). Traumatic memories: Empirical foundations, forensic and clinical implications. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 111-132.
30. Linton, M. (1982). Transformations of memory in everyday life. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed (pp. 77-91). New York: Freeman.
31. Livingston, R. B. (1967). Brain circuitry relating to complex behavior. In C. G. Quarton, T. Melnechuck, & F. O. Schmidt (Eds.), The neurosciences: A study program (568-577). New York: Rockefeller University Press.
32. Lockhart, R. S. (2002). Levels of processing, transfer-appropriate processing, and the concept of robust encoding. Memory, 10, 397-403.
33. Loftus, E. F., & Kaufman, L. (1993). Why do traumatic experiences sometimes produce good memory (flashbulbs) and sometimes no memory (repression)? In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb” memories (pp. 212-223). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Maki, R. H. (1998). Predicting performance on text: Delayed versus immediate predictions and tests. Memory & Cognition, 26, 959-964.
35. Matvey, G., Dunlosky, J., & Guttentag, R. (2001). Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): An analytic or nonanalytical basis for JOLs? Memory & Cognition, 29, 222-233.
36. McCloskey, M., Wible, C. G., & Cohen, N. J. (1988). Is there a special flashbulb-memory mechanism? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 171-181.
37. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
38. Neisser, U. (1982). Snapshots or benchmarks? In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. San Francisco: Freeman.
39. Neisser, U., & Harsh, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulbs: False recollections of hearing the news about the Challenger. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb memory” (pp. 9-31). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
41. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Gamma is a measure of the accuracy of predicting performance on one item relative to another item, not of the absolute performance on an individual item. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 257-260.
42. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The “delayed-JOL effect.” Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
43. Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., & Dunlosky, J. (2004). A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment recall and monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods, 9, 53.
44. Niedzwienska, A. (2003). Misleading postevent information and flashbulb memories. Memory, 11, 549-558.
45. Nourkova, V., Bernstein, D., & Loftus, E. F. (2004). Altering traumatic memory. Cognition & Emotion, 18, 575-585.
46. Peterson, L. R., & Peterson, M. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193-198.
47. Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Flashbulb memories of the assassination attempt on President Reagan. Cognition, 16, 63-80.
48. Pillemer, D. B., Koff, E., Rhinehart, E. D., & Rierdan, J. (1987). Flashbulb memories of menarche and adult menstrual distress. Journal of Adolescence, 10, 187-199.
49. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
50. Reynolds, R. I., & Takooshian, H. (1988). Where were you August 8, 1985? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 23-25.
51. Roediger, H. L. III (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
52. Roediger, H. L. III, Gallo, D. A., & Geraci, L. (2002). Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework. Memory, 10, 319-332.
53. Rubin, D. C. (1998). Knowledge and judgments about events that occurred prior to birth: The measurement of the persistence of information. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 397-400.
54. Schwartz, B. L. (1994). Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 357-375.
55. Serra, M. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2005). Does retrieval fluency contribute to the underconfidencewith- practice effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1258-1266.
56. Son, L. K. (2004). Spacing one’s study: Evidence for a metacognitive control strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 601-604.
57. Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2005). Judgments of learning: Evidence for a two-stage process. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1116-1129.
58. Spellman, B. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess. Psychological Science, 3, 315-316.
59. Spellman, B. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1997). When prophecy succeeds (too well): Inaccurate judgments of learning can produce better-than-perfect predictions. Paper presented at the 38th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November, 1997, Philadelphia.
60. Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2003). Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 14, 455-461.
61. Tekcan, A. I., & Demir, C. (2002). Is there a reminiscence bump for flashbulb memories? Paper presented at the 43rd annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November 2002, Kansas City, MO.
62. Tekcan, A. I., & Peynircioglu, Z. F. (2002). Effects of age on flashbulb memories. Psychology and Aging, 17, 416-422.
63. Thiede, K. W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T. D., & Wiley, J. (2005). Understanding the delayedkeyword effect on metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1267-1280.
64. Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.
65. Thompson, R. G., Moulin, C. J. A., Ridel, G. L., Hayre, S., Conway, M. A., & Jones, R. W. (2004). Recall of 9.11 in Alzheimer’s disease: Further evidence for intact flashbulb memory. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19, 495-496.
66. Tromp, S., Koss, M. P., Figueredo, A. J., & Tharan, M. (1995). Are rape memories different? A comparison of rape, other unpleasant, and pleasant memories among employed women. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8, 607-627.
67. Vesonder, G. T., & Voss, J. F. (1985). On the ability to predict one’s own responses while learning. Journal of Memory and Language. 24, 363-376.
68. Wagenaar, W. A. (1986). My memory: A study of autobiographical memory over six years. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 225-252.
69. Weaver, C. A., III. (1993). Do you need a “flash” to form a flashbulb memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 39-46.
70. Weaver, C. A., III. (1995). The search for “special mechanisms” in memory: Flashbulbs, flashbacks, and other not-so-bright ideas. False Memory Syndrome Newsletter, 4, 16-22.
71. Weaver, C. A., III, & Kelemen, W. L. (1997). Judgments of learning at delays: Shifts in response patterns or increased metamemory accuracy? Psychological Science, 8, 318-321.
72. Weaver, C. A., III, & Kelemen, W. L. (2003). Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: Evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1058-1065.
73. Weaver, C. A., III, & Krug, K. (2004). Consolidation-like effects in flashbulb memories: Evidence from September 11, 2001. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 517-530.
74. Winningham, R. G., Hyman, I. E., & Dinnel, D. L. (2000). Flashbulb memories? The effects of when the initial memory report was obtained. Memory, 8, 209-216.
75. Wolters, G., & Goudsmit, J. J. (2005). Flashbulb and event memory of September 11, 2001: Consistency, confidence and age effects. Psychological Reports, 96, 605-619.
76. Wright, D. B. (1993). Recall of the Hillsborough disaster over time: Systematic biases of “flashbulb” memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 129-138.
77. Wright, D. B., Gaskell, G. D., & Omuircheartaigh, C. A. (1997). The reliability of the subjective reports of memories. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 313-323.