Levels of processing, transfer-appropriate processing, and the concept of robust encoding

Memory

Volumn 10, Issue 5-6, 2002, Pages 397-403

  Lockhart, Robert S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CODING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL FUNCTION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; SEMANTICS; THEORY;

COGNITION; HUMANS; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0036756758     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658210244000225     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Challis, B.H., Velichkovsky, B.M., & Craik, F.I.M. (1996). Levels-of-processing effects on a variety of memory tasks: New findings and theoretical implications. Consciousness & Cognition: An International Journal, 5, 142-164.
2. Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
3. Fisher, R.P., & Craik, F.I.M. (1977). Interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 701-711.
4. Gardiner, J.M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309-313.
5. Glenberg, A.M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 95-112.
6. Gould, S.J. (1977). Darwin's untimely burial. In Ever Since Darwin (pp. 39-45). New York: Norton.
7. Greene, R.L. (1987). Effects of maintenance rehearsal on human memory. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 403-413.
8. Hannon, B., & Craik, F.I.M (2001). Encoding specificity revisited: The role of semantics. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 231-243.
9. Lockhart, R.S., & Craik, F.I.M. (1978). Levels of processing: A reply to Eysenck. British Journal of Psychology, 69, 171-175.
10. Lockhart, R.S., & Craik, F.I.M. (1990). Levels of processing: A retrospective analysis of a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 87-112.
11. Madigan, S.A. (1969). Intraserial repetition and coding processes in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 828-835.
12. Marmurek, H.H. (1995). Encoding, retrieval, main effects and interactions: were Lockhart and Craik (1990) on the level? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 174-192.
13. Martin, E. (1968). Stimulus meaningfulness and paired-associate transfer: An encoding variability hypothesis Psychological Review, 75, 421-441.
14. McDaniel, M.A., & Masson, M.E.J. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 11, 371-385.
15. Melton, A.W. (1970) The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 596-606.
16. Morris, C.D., Bransford, J.D., & Franks, J.J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer-appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
17. Moscovitch, M., & Craik, F.I.M. (1976). Depth of processing, retrieval cues, and uniqueness of encoding as factors in recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 447-458.
18. Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Jonides, J. (1984). Maintenance rehearsal: A two-component analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 10, 369-385.
19. Nelson, T.O. (1977). Repetition and levels of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 151-171.
20. Postman, L., & Knecht, K. (1983). Encoding variability and retention. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 133-152.
21. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89-102.
22. Roediger, H.L.III, & Gallo, D.A. (2001). Levels of processing: Some unanswered questions. In M. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, & H.L. Roediger III (Eds.), Perspectives on human memory and cognitive aging: Essays in honour of Fergus Craik (pp. 28-47). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
23. Roediger, H.L.III, Weldon, M.S., Stadler, M.L., & Riegler, G.L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: Word fragment and word stem completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1251-1269.
24. Schacter, D.L. (1996). Searching for memory. New York: Basic Books.
25. Soraci, S.A., Carlin, M.T., Chechile, R.A., Franks, J.J., Wills, T., & Watanabe, T. (1999). Encoding variability and cuing in generative processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 541-559.
26. Stamos, J. (1996). Popper, falsifiability, and evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy, 11, 161-191.
27. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D.M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80,