Judgments of learning at delays: Shifts in Response Patterns or Increased Metamemory Accuracy?

Psychological Science

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 318-321

  Weaver, Charles A ^a   Kelemen, William L ^b  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041021385     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00445.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Carroll, M., & Nelson, T.O. (1993). Effect of overlearning on the feeling of knowing is more detectable in within-subject than in between-subject designs. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 227-235.
2. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T.O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments for learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 20, 374-380.
3. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T.O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545-565.
4. Kelemen, W. (1995). Delayed judgments of learning (JOLs): Evaluating the monitoring-dual-memories (MDM) hypothesis. Unpublished master's thesis, Baylor University, Waco, TX.
5. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
6. Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 311-333.
7. Leonesio, R.J., & Nelson, T.O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 464-470.
8. Lovelace, E.A. (1984a). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 756-766.
9. Lovelace, E.A. (1984b). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability in free and cued recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 497-500.
10. Nelson, T.O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
11. Nelson, T.O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect." Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
12. Paivio, A., Yuille, J.C., & Madigan, S.A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 76(1, Pt. 2).
13. Schwartz, B.L. (1994). Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 357-375.
14. Spellman, B.A., & Bjork, R.A. (1992). When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess. Psychological Science, 3, 315-316.
15. Weaver, C.A., III. (1990). Constraining factors in calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 214-222.