Skill acquisition theory

Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 94-112

  DeKeyser, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85062838839     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203628942-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (88)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111 (4), 1036-1060.
5. Anderson, J. R., Fincham, J. M., & Douglass, S. (1997). The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 932-945.
6. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Arevart, S., & Nation, P. (1991). Fluency improvement in a second language. RELC Journal, 22, 84-94.
8. Bahrick, H. P., Hall, L. K., & Baker, M. K. (2013). Life-span maintenance of knowledge. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
9. Bahrick, H., Hall, L., Goggin, J., Bahrick, L., & Berger, S. (1994). Fifty years or language maintenance in bilingual Hispanic immigrants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 264-283.
10. Bird, S. (2010). Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 635-650.
11. Byrne, D. (Ed.). (1986). Teaching oral English (2nd ed.). Harlow, England: Longman.
12. Carpenter, S. K., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S. H. K., & Pashler, H. (2012). Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 369-378.
13. Cepeda, N., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J., Mozer, M., & Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing distributed practice. Experimental Psychology, 56, 236-246.
14. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380.
15. Chein, J., & Schneider, W. (2005). Neuroimaging studies of practice-related change: fMRI and meta-analytic evidence of a domain-general control network for learning. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 607-623.
16. Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., & Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 17-30.
17. Collins, L., Halter, R. H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). Time and the distribution of time in L2 instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 655-680.
18. de Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46, 529-555.
19. De Jong, N. (2005). Can second language grammar be learned through listening? An experimental study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 205-234.
20. De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 62, 533-568.
21. DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379-410.
22. DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195-221.
23. DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125-151). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24. DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
25. DeKeyser, R. M. (2007a). Situating the concept of practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 1-18). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26. DeKeyser, R. M. (2007b). Study abroad as foreign language practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 208-226). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27. DeKeyser, R. M. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second language teaching (pp. 119-138). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
28. DeKeyser, R. M., & Criado-Sánchez, R. (2012). Automatization, skill acquisition, and practice in second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 323-331). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
29. DeKeyser, R. M., & Sokalski, K. (2001). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Form-focused instruction and second language learning (pp. 81-112). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
30. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197-261). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32. Dulay, H., M. Burt, & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33. Ellis, N. (2002). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2), 297-339.
34. Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305-352.
35. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36. Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
37. Ferman, S., Olshtain, E., Schechtman, E., & Karni, A. (2009). The acquisition of a linguistic skill by adults: Procedural and declarative memory interact in the learning of an artificial morphological rule. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 384-412.
38. Fitts, P., & Posner, M. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
39. Goldschneider, J., & DeKeyser, R. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1-50.
40. Healy, A. F., Barshi, I., Crutcher, R. J., Tao, L., Rickard, T. C., Marmie, W. R.,… Bourne, Lyle E., Jr. (1998). Toward the improvement of training in foreign languages. In A. F. Healy & L. E. J. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning. Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 3-53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Hill, N. M., & Schneider, W. (2006). Brain changes in the development of expertise: Neuroanatomical and neurophysiological evidence about skill-based adaptations. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 653-682). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42. Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
43. Kim, J. W., Ritter, F. E., & Koubek, R. J. (2013). An integrated theory for improved skill acquisition and retention in the three stages of learning. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 14, 22-37.
44. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1994). An innovative program for primary ESL students in Quebec. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 563-579.
45. Logan, G. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
46. Logan, G. (1992). Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: A test of the instance theory of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 883-914.
47. Logan, G. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376-400.
48. Long, M., & Norris, J. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In M. Byram (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597-603). London, England: Routledge.
49. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
50. Luk, Z. P., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural - s, articles, and possessive’s. Language Learning, 59, 721-754.
51. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
52. Lyster, R., & Sato, M. (2013). Skill acquisition theory and the role of practice in L2 development. In M. García Mayo, J. Gutierrez-Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 71-91). Amsterdam, Netherlands:John Benjamins.
53. Macaro, E. (2003). Teaching and learning a second language: A guide to recent research and its applications. London, England: Continuum.
54. Mathews, R., Buss, R., Stanley, W., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J. R., & Druhan, B. (1989). Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1083-1100.
55. Meyer, D., & Kieras, D. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65.
56. Nakata, T. (2012, September). Effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language vocabulary learning: Do the amount of spacing and retention interval make a difference? Paper presented at EUROSLA conference, Poznan, Poland.
57. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
60. O’Malley, J., & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
61. Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
62. Qin, Y., Anderson, J. R., Silk, E., Stenger, V., & Carter, C. (2004). The change of the brain activation patterns along with the children’s practice in algebra equation solving. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 5686-5691.
63. Raichle, M., Fiez, J., Videen, T., MacLeod, A.-M., Pardo, J. V., Fox, P.,… Peterson, S. (1994). Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. Cerebral Cortex, 4, 8-26.
64. Ranta, L., & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students’ oral production abilities: The awareness, practice, and feedback sequence. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141-160). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
65. Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-247.
66. Robinson, P. (2011). Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61 (S1), 1-36.
67. Rodgers, D. M. (2011). The automatization of verbal morphology in instructed second language acquisition. IRAL, 49, 295-319.
68. Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2007). Increasing retention without increasing study time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16 (4), 1209-1224.
69. Sallas, B., Mathews, R. C., Lane, S. M., & Sun, R. (2007). Developing rich and quickly accessed knowledge of an artificial grammar. Memory and Cognition, 35, 2118-2133.
70. Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 591-626.
71. Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. London, England: Routledge.
72. Serrano, R. (2011). The time factor in EFL classroom practice. Language Learning, 61, 117-145.
73. Serrano, R., & Muñoz, C. (2007). Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL? System, 35, 305-321.
74. Shintani, N., Li, S., & Ellis, R. (2013). Comprehension-based versus production-based grammar instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Language Learning, 63, 296-329.
75. Singley, M., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
76. Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263-308.
77. Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (in press). Aptitude-treatment interactions in distributed and massed practice. Unpublished manuscript, College Park, MD.
78. Taatgen, N. A., & Anderson, J. R. (2010). The past, present, and future of cognitive architectures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2 (3), 693-704.
79. Taatgen, N. A., Huss, D., Dickison, D., & Anderson, J. R. (2008). The acquisition of robust and flexible cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 548-565.
80. Taatgen, N. A., & Lee, F. J. (2003). Production compilation: A simple mechanism to model complex skill acquisition. Human Factors, 45, 61-76.
81. Tanaka, T. (2001). Comprehension and production practice in grammar instruction: Does their combined use facilitate second language acquisition? JALT Journal, 23, 6-30.
82. Towell, R., & Hawkins, R. (1994). Approaches to second language acquisition. Clevedon, England:Multilingual Matters.
83. Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17, 84-119.
84. Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231-270.
85. Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
86. VanPatten, B. (Ed.). (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
87. White, J., & Turner, C. E. (2005). Comparing children’s oral ability in two ESL programs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 491-517.
88. Williams, J. (2009). Implicit learning in second language acquisition. In T. Bhatia & W. Ritchie (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 319-353). Bingley, England: Emerald.