Optimising feedback for early career professionals: a scoping review and new framework

Medical Education

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2019, Pages 355-368

  Mattick, Karen ^a   Brennan, Nicola ^b   Briscoe, Simon ^c   Papoutsi, Chrysanthi ^d   Pearson, Mark ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b PLYMOUTH UNIVERSITY PENINSULA SCHOOLS OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAREER; CINAHL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; EDUCATION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICISM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION CENTER; LEARNING; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; PSYCINFO; REVIEW; SOCIOLOGY; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORKPLACE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; PSYCHOLOGY;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEEDBACK; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; LEARNING;

EID: 85062345164     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/medu.13794     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007;77 (1):81–112.
2. Education Endowment Foundation.Teaching and Learning Toolkit. EEF 2018. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evidence-summaries/teaching-learning-toolkit. [Accessed 20 December 2018].
3. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O'Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6.
4. Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, O'Brien MA, French SD, Young J, Odgaard-Jensen J. Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29 (11):1534–41.
5. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996;119 (2):254–84.
6. Fraser SW, Greenhalgh T. Coping with complexity: educating for capability. BMJ 2001;323 (7316):799–803.
7. Colquhoun HL, Brehaut JC, Sales A, Ivers N, Grimshaw J, Michie S, Carroll K, Chalifoux M, Eva KW. A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback. Implement Sci 2013;8:66.
8. Colquhoun HL, Carroll K, Eva KW, Grimshaw JM, Ivers N, Michie S, Sales A, Brehaut JC. Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses. Implement Sci 2017;12 (1):117.
9. Ramani S, Krackov SK. Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Med Teach 2012;34 (10):787–91.
10. Papoutsi C, Mattick K, Pearson M, Brennan N, Briscoe S, Wong G. Social and professional influences on antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: a realist review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2017;72 (9):2418–30.
11. Eraut M. Feedback. Learn Health Soc Care 2006;5 (3):111–8.
12. Eraut M. Informal learning in the workplace. Stud Contin Educ 2004;26 (2):247–73.
13. Van de Ridder JMM, McGaghie WC, Stokking KM, ten Cate OTJ. Variables that affect the process and outcome of feedback, relevant for medical training: a meta-review. Med Educ 2015;49 (7):658–73.
14. Grant MJBA. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J 2009;26 (2):91–108.
15. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8 (1):19–32.
16. Wong SSL, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in MEDLINE. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004;107 (1):311–6.
17. Gough D, Thomas J. Systematic reviews of research in education: aims, myths and multiple methods. Rev Educ 2016;4 (1):84–102.
18. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:g1687.
19. Hysong SJ. Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality. Med Care 2009;47 (3):356–63.
20. Rogers RLG, Narvaez Y, Venkatesh AK, Fleischman W, Hall MK, Taylor RA, Hersey D, Sette L, Melnick ER. Improving emergency physician performance using audit and feedback: a systematic review. Am J Emerg Med 2015;33 (10):1505–14.
21. Larson EL, Patel SJ, Evans D, Saiman L. Feedback as a strategy to change behaviour: the devil is in the details. J Eval Clin Pract 2013;19 (2):230–4.
22. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, van der Vleuten CPM, Metsemakers JF. Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ 2009;14 (3):399–410.
23. Gude WT, Roos-Blom M-J, van der Veer SN, Dongelmans DA, de Jonge E, Francis JJ, Peek N, de Keizer NF. Health professionals’ perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of audit and feedback on their intentions to improve practice: a theory-based study in Dutch intensive care units. Implement Sci 2018;13 (1):33.
24. Brennan NBM, Pearson M, Wong G, Cooper C, Archer J. Towards an understanding of how appraisal of doctors produces its effects: a realist review. Med Educ 2017;51 (10):1002–13.
25. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD. Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15 (6):433–6.
26. Gardner B, Whittington C, McAteer J, Eccles MP, Michie S. Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: the example of audit and feedback. Soc Sci Med 2010;70 (10):1618–25.
27. Redwood S, Ngwenya NB, Hodson J, Ferner RE, Coleman JJ. Effects of a computerized feedback intervention on safety performance by junior doctors: results from a randomized mixed method study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13 (1):63.
28. McLellan L, Dornan T, Newton P, Williams SD, Lewis P, Steinke D, Tully MP. Pharmacist-led feedback workshops increase appropriate prescribing of antimicrobials. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016;71 (5):1415–25.
29. Milanowski AT. Split roles in performance evaluation–a field study involving new teachers. J Person Eval Educ 2005;18 (3):153–69.
30. Baysari MT, Oliver K, Egan B, Li L, Richardson K, Sandaradura I, Westbrook JI, Day RO. Audit and feedback of antibiotic use: utilising electronic prescription data. Appl Clin Inform 2013;4 (4):583–95.
31. Boekeloo BO, Becker DM, Levine DM, Belitsos PC, Pearson TA. Strategies for increasing house staff management of cholesterol with inpatients. Am J Prev Med 1990;6 (2 suppl):51–9.
32. Brinkman WB, Geraghty SR, Lanphear BP, Khoury JC, Gonzalez del Rey JA, DeWitt TG, Britto MT. Effect of multisource feedback on resident communication skills and professionalism: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161 (1):44–9.
33. Clay AS, Que L, Petrusa ER, Sebastian M, Govert J. Debriefing in the intensive care unit: a feedback tool to facilitate bedside teaching. Crit Care Med 2007;35 (3):738–54.
34. Oxford University Press. Oxford Dictionary. 2019. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/audit [Accessed 23 January 2019].